Efficiency assessment of urban planning transformations: economic and legal aspects

Introduction. A discrepancy between legislative requirements for the compulsory recognition of economic factors in the process of drafting urban planning documents, on the one hand, and the unavailability of an approved implementation procedure, on the other hand, makes a substantial impact on decis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Svetlana А. Ershova, Svetlana А. Shishelova, Тamara N. Orlovskaya
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU) 2020-09-01
Series:Vestnik MGSU
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2020.9.1308-1320
id doaj-9837e5f0907e47dfafe554ff49e3bdc8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9837e5f0907e47dfafe554ff49e3bdc82021-03-17T08:45:24ZengMoscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU)Vestnik MGSU 1997-09352020-09-011591308132010.22227/1997-0935.2020.9.1308-1320Efficiency assessment of urban planning transformations: economic and legal aspectsSvetlana А. Ershova0Svetlana А. Shishelova1Тamara N. Orlovskaya2State Research and Design Center of Saint Petersburg Master PlanState Research and Design Center of Saint Petersburg Master PlanSaint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (SPbGASU)Introduction. A discrepancy between legislative requirements for the compulsory recognition of economic factors in the process of drafting urban planning documents, on the one hand, and the unavailability of an approved implementation procedure, on the other hand, makes a substantial impact on decision making processes that deal with urban planning transformations. The unavailability of (a) unified approaches to the assessment of the economic efficiency of urban planning solutions, (b) an approved efficiency assessment procedure or (c) a database decelerates the process of making well-grounded urban development decisions. Therefore, development of a conceptual framework for the efficiency assessment in terms of integrated urban development actions and their implementation procedures is particularly relevant. The subject of this research consists in the study of the regulatory/methodological framework of urban development, and its mission is to analyze the main regulatory problems that accompany the efficiency assessment of urban development. Materials and methods. The co-authors employed a socio-spatial approach that takes account of objective and subjective factors of a high-quality urban environment at various stages of the urban planning documentation drafting process. Within the framework of this approach, methods of comparative/logical analysis were applied, expert evaluations were made, materials, developed by foreign and Russian scientists, Russian legislative acts, methodological documents were studied with regard to the evaluation of the urban development efficiency. Results. The co-authors identified gravest theoretical and methodological problems of urban transformation efficiency assessment. An assessment procedure was developed. The co-authors suggested organizing the urban transformation efficiency assessment in the course of drafting urban planning documentation. Principal efficiency assessment stages were identified, and the main objectives of each stage were formulated. Conclusions. The novelty and practical relevance of this research reside in the fact that the co-authors have identified problems of the legal framework of assessment procedures and suggested a sequential estimation of the economic efficiency of urban transformations so that each subject of urban planning activities followed a unified research-driven decision making procedure.https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2020.9.1308-1320efficiency assessmenturban planning developmenturban planning documentationsocio-spatial approachurban environment qualityliving standardsnormative modelstandards of urban designintegrated sustainable development of areasmonitoring
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Svetlana А. Ershova
Svetlana А. Shishelova
Тamara N. Orlovskaya
spellingShingle Svetlana А. Ershova
Svetlana А. Shishelova
Тamara N. Orlovskaya
Efficiency assessment of urban planning transformations: economic and legal aspects
Vestnik MGSU
efficiency assessment
urban planning development
urban planning documentation
socio-spatial approach
urban environment quality
living standards
normative model
standards of urban design
integrated sustainable development of areas
monitoring
author_facet Svetlana А. Ershova
Svetlana А. Shishelova
Тamara N. Orlovskaya
author_sort Svetlana А. Ershova
title Efficiency assessment of urban planning transformations: economic and legal aspects
title_short Efficiency assessment of urban planning transformations: economic and legal aspects
title_full Efficiency assessment of urban planning transformations: economic and legal aspects
title_fullStr Efficiency assessment of urban planning transformations: economic and legal aspects
title_full_unstemmed Efficiency assessment of urban planning transformations: economic and legal aspects
title_sort efficiency assessment of urban planning transformations: economic and legal aspects
publisher Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU)
series Vestnik MGSU
issn 1997-0935
publishDate 2020-09-01
description Introduction. A discrepancy between legislative requirements for the compulsory recognition of economic factors in the process of drafting urban planning documents, on the one hand, and the unavailability of an approved implementation procedure, on the other hand, makes a substantial impact on decision making processes that deal with urban planning transformations. The unavailability of (a) unified approaches to the assessment of the economic efficiency of urban planning solutions, (b) an approved efficiency assessment procedure or (c) a database decelerates the process of making well-grounded urban development decisions. Therefore, development of a conceptual framework for the efficiency assessment in terms of integrated urban development actions and their implementation procedures is particularly relevant. The subject of this research consists in the study of the regulatory/methodological framework of urban development, and its mission is to analyze the main regulatory problems that accompany the efficiency assessment of urban development. Materials and methods. The co-authors employed a socio-spatial approach that takes account of objective and subjective factors of a high-quality urban environment at various stages of the urban planning documentation drafting process. Within the framework of this approach, methods of comparative/logical analysis were applied, expert evaluations were made, materials, developed by foreign and Russian scientists, Russian legislative acts, methodological documents were studied with regard to the evaluation of the urban development efficiency. Results. The co-authors identified gravest theoretical and methodological problems of urban transformation efficiency assessment. An assessment procedure was developed. The co-authors suggested organizing the urban transformation efficiency assessment in the course of drafting urban planning documentation. Principal efficiency assessment stages were identified, and the main objectives of each stage were formulated. Conclusions. The novelty and practical relevance of this research reside in the fact that the co-authors have identified problems of the legal framework of assessment procedures and suggested a sequential estimation of the economic efficiency of urban transformations so that each subject of urban planning activities followed a unified research-driven decision making procedure.
topic efficiency assessment
urban planning development
urban planning documentation
socio-spatial approach
urban environment quality
living standards
normative model
standards of urban design
integrated sustainable development of areas
monitoring
url https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2020.9.1308-1320
work_keys_str_mv AT svetlanaaershova efficiencyassessmentofurbanplanningtransformationseconomicandlegalaspects
AT svetlanaashishelova efficiencyassessmentofurbanplanningtransformationseconomicandlegalaspects
AT tamaranorlovskaya efficiencyassessmentofurbanplanningtransformationseconomicandlegalaspects
_version_ 1724218558246813696