Sustainable Distance Education: Comparison of Digital Pedagogical Models
The literature shows strong evidence of how different learning models influence learning. The kind of model used is a basic variable that can either help or hinder sustainable education. The objective of this research is to analyse how digital pedagogical models of three kinds (collaborative, social...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-10-01
|
Series: | Sustainability |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9067 |
id |
doaj-9837dd5e2aba4b7493fbb6d87b688830 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9837dd5e2aba4b7493fbb6d87b6888302020-11-25T01:40:33ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502020-10-01129067906710.3390/su12219067Sustainable Distance Education: Comparison of Digital Pedagogical ModelsSonia Santoveña-Casal0Mª Dolores Fernández Pérez1Department of Education, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, 28040 Madrid, SpainDepartment of Education, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, 28040 Madrid, SpainThe literature shows strong evidence of how different learning models influence learning. The kind of model used is a basic variable that can either help or hinder sustainable education. The objective of this research is to analyse how digital pedagogical models of three kinds (collaborative, social, and independent) influence the learning experience. The study is based on a design that combines triangulation, a theoretical model, quantitative methods (descriptive analysis and contrast of means), and qualitative methods (discourse analysis, following the principles of grounded theory). The importance of social and collaborative models in sustainable education is proved; both types of models promote a positive learning experience. They strengthen inter-student relationships, a feeling of belonging to a community with shared interests, and feelings of membership and cohesion. An independent model may hamper students’ perception of current knowledge and development of collaborative competences, in contrast to the more-interactive model. These results can be assessed in greater depth through future research exploring independent models’ possible potential for analysing environmental problems and their tie-in to personal decisions.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9067collaborative learningdigital pedagogysocial learningindependent or autonomous learning |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sonia Santoveña-Casal Mª Dolores Fernández Pérez |
spellingShingle |
Sonia Santoveña-Casal Mª Dolores Fernández Pérez Sustainable Distance Education: Comparison of Digital Pedagogical Models Sustainability collaborative learning digital pedagogy social learning independent or autonomous learning |
author_facet |
Sonia Santoveña-Casal Mª Dolores Fernández Pérez |
author_sort |
Sonia Santoveña-Casal |
title |
Sustainable Distance Education: Comparison of Digital Pedagogical Models |
title_short |
Sustainable Distance Education: Comparison of Digital Pedagogical Models |
title_full |
Sustainable Distance Education: Comparison of Digital Pedagogical Models |
title_fullStr |
Sustainable Distance Education: Comparison of Digital Pedagogical Models |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sustainable Distance Education: Comparison of Digital Pedagogical Models |
title_sort |
sustainable distance education: comparison of digital pedagogical models |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sustainability |
issn |
2071-1050 |
publishDate |
2020-10-01 |
description |
The literature shows strong evidence of how different learning models influence learning. The kind of model used is a basic variable that can either help or hinder sustainable education. The objective of this research is to analyse how digital pedagogical models of three kinds (collaborative, social, and independent) influence the learning experience. The study is based on a design that combines triangulation, a theoretical model, quantitative methods (descriptive analysis and contrast of means), and qualitative methods (discourse analysis, following the principles of grounded theory). The importance of social and collaborative models in sustainable education is proved; both types of models promote a positive learning experience. They strengthen inter-student relationships, a feeling of belonging to a community with shared interests, and feelings of membership and cohesion. An independent model may hamper students’ perception of current knowledge and development of collaborative competences, in contrast to the more-interactive model. These results can be assessed in greater depth through future research exploring independent models’ possible potential for analysing environmental problems and their tie-in to personal decisions. |
topic |
collaborative learning digital pedagogy social learning independent or autonomous learning |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9067 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT soniasantovenacasal sustainabledistanceeducationcomparisonofdigitalpedagogicalmodels AT madoloresfernandezperez sustainabledistanceeducationcomparisonofdigitalpedagogicalmodels |
_version_ |
1725045037284196352 |