Sustainable Distance Education: Comparison of Digital Pedagogical Models

The literature shows strong evidence of how different learning models influence learning. The kind of model used is a basic variable that can either help or hinder sustainable education. The objective of this research is to analyse how digital pedagogical models of three kinds (collaborative, social...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sonia Santoveña-Casal, Mª Dolores Fernández Pérez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-10-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9067
id doaj-9837dd5e2aba4b7493fbb6d87b688830
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9837dd5e2aba4b7493fbb6d87b6888302020-11-25T01:40:33ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502020-10-01129067906710.3390/su12219067Sustainable Distance Education: Comparison of Digital Pedagogical ModelsSonia Santoveña-Casal0Mª Dolores Fernández Pérez1Department of Education, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, 28040 Madrid, SpainDepartment of Education, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, 28040 Madrid, SpainThe literature shows strong evidence of how different learning models influence learning. The kind of model used is a basic variable that can either help or hinder sustainable education. The objective of this research is to analyse how digital pedagogical models of three kinds (collaborative, social, and independent) influence the learning experience. The study is based on a design that combines triangulation, a theoretical model, quantitative methods (descriptive analysis and contrast of means), and qualitative methods (discourse analysis, following the principles of grounded theory). The importance of social and collaborative models in sustainable education is proved; both types of models promote a positive learning experience. They strengthen inter-student relationships, a feeling of belonging to a community with shared interests, and feelings of membership and cohesion. An independent model may hamper students’ perception of current knowledge and development of collaborative competences, in contrast to the more-interactive model. These results can be assessed in greater depth through future research exploring independent models’ possible potential for analysing environmental problems and their tie-in to personal decisions.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9067collaborative learningdigital pedagogysocial learningindependent or autonomous learning
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sonia Santoveña-Casal
Mª Dolores Fernández Pérez
spellingShingle Sonia Santoveña-Casal
Mª Dolores Fernández Pérez
Sustainable Distance Education: Comparison of Digital Pedagogical Models
Sustainability
collaborative learning
digital pedagogy
social learning
independent or autonomous learning
author_facet Sonia Santoveña-Casal
Mª Dolores Fernández Pérez
author_sort Sonia Santoveña-Casal
title Sustainable Distance Education: Comparison of Digital Pedagogical Models
title_short Sustainable Distance Education: Comparison of Digital Pedagogical Models
title_full Sustainable Distance Education: Comparison of Digital Pedagogical Models
title_fullStr Sustainable Distance Education: Comparison of Digital Pedagogical Models
title_full_unstemmed Sustainable Distance Education: Comparison of Digital Pedagogical Models
title_sort sustainable distance education: comparison of digital pedagogical models
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2020-10-01
description The literature shows strong evidence of how different learning models influence learning. The kind of model used is a basic variable that can either help or hinder sustainable education. The objective of this research is to analyse how digital pedagogical models of three kinds (collaborative, social, and independent) influence the learning experience. The study is based on a design that combines triangulation, a theoretical model, quantitative methods (descriptive analysis and contrast of means), and qualitative methods (discourse analysis, following the principles of grounded theory). The importance of social and collaborative models in sustainable education is proved; both types of models promote a positive learning experience. They strengthen inter-student relationships, a feeling of belonging to a community with shared interests, and feelings of membership and cohesion. An independent model may hamper students’ perception of current knowledge and development of collaborative competences, in contrast to the more-interactive model. These results can be assessed in greater depth through future research exploring independent models’ possible potential for analysing environmental problems and their tie-in to personal decisions.
topic collaborative learning
digital pedagogy
social learning
independent or autonomous learning
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9067
work_keys_str_mv AT soniasantovenacasal sustainabledistanceeducationcomparisonofdigitalpedagogicalmodels
AT madoloresfernandezperez sustainabledistanceeducationcomparisonofdigitalpedagogicalmodels
_version_ 1725045037284196352