Bias-Correction in Vector Autoregressive Models: A Simulation Study

We analyze the properties of various methods for bias-correcting parameter estimates in both stationary and non-stationary vector autoregressive models. First, we show that two analytical bias formulas from the existing literature are in fact identical. Next, based on a detailed simulation study, we...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tom Engsted, Thomas Q. Pedersen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2014-03-01
Series:Econometrics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2225-1146/2/1/45
id doaj-9833543d3e314d5cadd9340b031ac04e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9833543d3e314d5cadd9340b031ac04e2020-11-24T23:13:39ZengMDPI AGEconometrics2225-11462014-03-0121457110.3390/econometrics2010045econometrics2010045Bias-Correction in Vector Autoregressive Models: A Simulation StudyTom Engsted0Thomas Q. Pedersen1CREATES, Department of Economics and Business, Aarhus University, Fuglesangs Alle 4, DK-8210 Aarhus V, DenmarkCREATES, Department of Economics and Business, Aarhus University, Fuglesangs Alle 4, DK-8210 Aarhus V, DenmarkWe analyze the properties of various methods for bias-correcting parameter estimates in both stationary and non-stationary vector autoregressive models. First, we show that two analytical bias formulas from the existing literature are in fact identical. Next, based on a detailed simulation study, we show that when the model is stationary this simple bias formula compares very favorably to bootstrap bias-correction, both in terms of bias and mean squared error. In non-stationary models, the analytical bias formula performs noticeably worse than bootstrapping. Both methods yield a notable improvement over ordinary least squares. We pay special attention to the risk of pushing an otherwise stationary model into the non-stationary region of the parameter space when correcting for bias. Finally, we consider a recently proposed reduced-bias weighted least squares estimator, and we find that it compares very favorably in non-stationary models.http://www.mdpi.com/2225-1146/2/1/45bias reductionVAR modelanalytical bias formulabootstrapiterationYule-Walkernon-stationary systemskewed and fat-tailed data
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tom Engsted
Thomas Q. Pedersen
spellingShingle Tom Engsted
Thomas Q. Pedersen
Bias-Correction in Vector Autoregressive Models: A Simulation Study
Econometrics
bias reduction
VAR model
analytical bias formula
bootstrap
iteration
Yule-Walker
non-stationary system
skewed and fat-tailed data
author_facet Tom Engsted
Thomas Q. Pedersen
author_sort Tom Engsted
title Bias-Correction in Vector Autoregressive Models: A Simulation Study
title_short Bias-Correction in Vector Autoregressive Models: A Simulation Study
title_full Bias-Correction in Vector Autoregressive Models: A Simulation Study
title_fullStr Bias-Correction in Vector Autoregressive Models: A Simulation Study
title_full_unstemmed Bias-Correction in Vector Autoregressive Models: A Simulation Study
title_sort bias-correction in vector autoregressive models: a simulation study
publisher MDPI AG
series Econometrics
issn 2225-1146
publishDate 2014-03-01
description We analyze the properties of various methods for bias-correcting parameter estimates in both stationary and non-stationary vector autoregressive models. First, we show that two analytical bias formulas from the existing literature are in fact identical. Next, based on a detailed simulation study, we show that when the model is stationary this simple bias formula compares very favorably to bootstrap bias-correction, both in terms of bias and mean squared error. In non-stationary models, the analytical bias formula performs noticeably worse than bootstrapping. Both methods yield a notable improvement over ordinary least squares. We pay special attention to the risk of pushing an otherwise stationary model into the non-stationary region of the parameter space when correcting for bias. Finally, we consider a recently proposed reduced-bias weighted least squares estimator, and we find that it compares very favorably in non-stationary models.
topic bias reduction
VAR model
analytical bias formula
bootstrap
iteration
Yule-Walker
non-stationary system
skewed and fat-tailed data
url http://www.mdpi.com/2225-1146/2/1/45
work_keys_str_mv AT tomengsted biascorrectioninvectorautoregressivemodelsasimulationstudy
AT thomasqpedersen biascorrectioninvectorautoregressivemodelsasimulationstudy
_version_ 1725597331722600448