Bias-Correction in Vector Autoregressive Models: A Simulation Study
We analyze the properties of various methods for bias-correcting parameter estimates in both stationary and non-stationary vector autoregressive models. First, we show that two analytical bias formulas from the existing literature are in fact identical. Next, based on a detailed simulation study, we...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2014-03-01
|
Series: | Econometrics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2225-1146/2/1/45 |
id |
doaj-9833543d3e314d5cadd9340b031ac04e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9833543d3e314d5cadd9340b031ac04e2020-11-24T23:13:39ZengMDPI AGEconometrics2225-11462014-03-0121457110.3390/econometrics2010045econometrics2010045Bias-Correction in Vector Autoregressive Models: A Simulation StudyTom Engsted0Thomas Q. Pedersen1CREATES, Department of Economics and Business, Aarhus University, Fuglesangs Alle 4, DK-8210 Aarhus V, DenmarkCREATES, Department of Economics and Business, Aarhus University, Fuglesangs Alle 4, DK-8210 Aarhus V, DenmarkWe analyze the properties of various methods for bias-correcting parameter estimates in both stationary and non-stationary vector autoregressive models. First, we show that two analytical bias formulas from the existing literature are in fact identical. Next, based on a detailed simulation study, we show that when the model is stationary this simple bias formula compares very favorably to bootstrap bias-correction, both in terms of bias and mean squared error. In non-stationary models, the analytical bias formula performs noticeably worse than bootstrapping. Both methods yield a notable improvement over ordinary least squares. We pay special attention to the risk of pushing an otherwise stationary model into the non-stationary region of the parameter space when correcting for bias. Finally, we consider a recently proposed reduced-bias weighted least squares estimator, and we find that it compares very favorably in non-stationary models.http://www.mdpi.com/2225-1146/2/1/45bias reductionVAR modelanalytical bias formulabootstrapiterationYule-Walkernon-stationary systemskewed and fat-tailed data |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Tom Engsted Thomas Q. Pedersen |
spellingShingle |
Tom Engsted Thomas Q. Pedersen Bias-Correction in Vector Autoregressive Models: A Simulation Study Econometrics bias reduction VAR model analytical bias formula bootstrap iteration Yule-Walker non-stationary system skewed and fat-tailed data |
author_facet |
Tom Engsted Thomas Q. Pedersen |
author_sort |
Tom Engsted |
title |
Bias-Correction in Vector Autoregressive Models: A Simulation Study |
title_short |
Bias-Correction in Vector Autoregressive Models: A Simulation Study |
title_full |
Bias-Correction in Vector Autoregressive Models: A Simulation Study |
title_fullStr |
Bias-Correction in Vector Autoregressive Models: A Simulation Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bias-Correction in Vector Autoregressive Models: A Simulation Study |
title_sort |
bias-correction in vector autoregressive models: a simulation study |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Econometrics |
issn |
2225-1146 |
publishDate |
2014-03-01 |
description |
We analyze the properties of various methods for bias-correcting parameter estimates in both stationary and non-stationary vector autoregressive models. First, we show that two analytical bias formulas from the existing literature are in fact identical. Next, based on a detailed simulation study, we show that when the model is stationary this simple bias formula compares very favorably to bootstrap bias-correction, both in terms of bias and mean squared error. In non-stationary models, the analytical bias formula performs noticeably worse than bootstrapping. Both methods yield a notable improvement over ordinary least squares. We pay special attention to the risk of pushing an otherwise stationary model into the non-stationary region of the parameter space when correcting for bias. Finally, we consider a recently proposed reduced-bias weighted least squares estimator, and we find that it compares very favorably in non-stationary models. |
topic |
bias reduction VAR model analytical bias formula bootstrap iteration Yule-Walker non-stationary system skewed and fat-tailed data |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2225-1146/2/1/45 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT tomengsted biascorrectioninvectorautoregressivemodelsasimulationstudy AT thomasqpedersen biascorrectioninvectorautoregressivemodelsasimulationstudy |
_version_ |
1725597331722600448 |