„... das Unendliche im Endlichen gebären ...“

The following contribution investigates the specific means of signification that Creuzer articulates for the categories ‘symbol’ and ‘myth’ in his Symbolik und Mythologie der alten Völker (Symbolism and Mythology of the Ancient Peoples). Three processes of signification can be distinguished: 1. the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Susanne Gödde
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Institut des Textes & Manuscrits Modernes (ITEM) 2010-12-01
Series:Flaubert: Revue Critique et Génétique
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/flaubert/1214
id doaj-9831720c247f44b8ae5ae504cd548fe0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9831720c247f44b8ae5ae504cd548fe02020-11-25T03:35:30ZfraInstitut des Textes & Manuscrits Modernes (ITEM)Flaubert: Revue Critique et Génétique1969-61912010-12-01„... das Unendliche im Endlichen gebären ...“Susanne GöddeThe following contribution investigates the specific means of signification that Creuzer articulates for the categories ‘symbol’ and ‘myth’ in his Symbolik und Mythologie der alten Völker (Symbolism and Mythology of the Ancient Peoples). Three processes of signification can be distinguished: 1. the meaning of a myth or mythical figure is constituted by  postulating inter-religious relations, often with recourse to etymological or similar linguistic relations; and a previous truth or dogmatic system is inferred to lie ‘behind’ the narrative and its linguistic interrelations. In these cases, Creuzer locates the authentic religious meaning within those relations. 2. Meaning is constituted through the indexicality of a (primarily aniconic) image of a god, whereby the cult-image of a phallus (which, according to Creuzer, represents the letter of a natural language) emerges as a privileged signifier. 3. Meaning is constituted by an incongruence of form and content. In this case, the symbol, threatening to explode its form, contains an ecstatic component. In contrast to the classicist ideal of a self-contained and well-proportioned whole, this incongruence gestures towards an aesthetic of ugliness. All three processes can be understood as anti-classical, bound up in a romantic hermeneutic.http://journals.openedition.org/flaubert/1214Creuzer Georg F.mythpoeticreligionsymbolicSymbolik und Mythologie der alten Völker
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Susanne Gödde
spellingShingle Susanne Gödde
„... das Unendliche im Endlichen gebären ...“
Flaubert: Revue Critique et Génétique
Creuzer Georg F.
myth
poetic
religion
symbolic
Symbolik und Mythologie der alten Völker
author_facet Susanne Gödde
author_sort Susanne Gödde
title „... das Unendliche im Endlichen gebären ...“
title_short „... das Unendliche im Endlichen gebären ...“
title_full „... das Unendliche im Endlichen gebären ...“
title_fullStr „... das Unendliche im Endlichen gebären ...“
title_full_unstemmed „... das Unendliche im Endlichen gebären ...“
title_sort „... das unendliche im endlichen gebären ...“
publisher Institut des Textes & Manuscrits Modernes (ITEM)
series Flaubert: Revue Critique et Génétique
issn 1969-6191
publishDate 2010-12-01
description The following contribution investigates the specific means of signification that Creuzer articulates for the categories ‘symbol’ and ‘myth’ in his Symbolik und Mythologie der alten Völker (Symbolism and Mythology of the Ancient Peoples). Three processes of signification can be distinguished: 1. the meaning of a myth or mythical figure is constituted by  postulating inter-religious relations, often with recourse to etymological or similar linguistic relations; and a previous truth or dogmatic system is inferred to lie ‘behind’ the narrative and its linguistic interrelations. In these cases, Creuzer locates the authentic religious meaning within those relations. 2. Meaning is constituted through the indexicality of a (primarily aniconic) image of a god, whereby the cult-image of a phallus (which, according to Creuzer, represents the letter of a natural language) emerges as a privileged signifier. 3. Meaning is constituted by an incongruence of form and content. In this case, the symbol, threatening to explode its form, contains an ecstatic component. In contrast to the classicist ideal of a self-contained and well-proportioned whole, this incongruence gestures towards an aesthetic of ugliness. All three processes can be understood as anti-classical, bound up in a romantic hermeneutic.
topic Creuzer Georg F.
myth
poetic
religion
symbolic
Symbolik und Mythologie der alten Völker
url http://journals.openedition.org/flaubert/1214
work_keys_str_mv AT susannegodde dasunendlicheimendlichengebaren
_version_ 1724554071932665856