Patient and provider differences in the treatment of opioid-induced constipation: a qualitative study

Abstract Background Patients using opioids to treat chronic non-cancer pain often experience side effects that may affect health-related quality of life (HRQOL). These side effects include opioid-induced constipation (OIC), sedation, dizziness, and nausea. OIC can significantly affect HRQOL for pati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michelle S. Keller, Alma Jusufagic, Brennan M. R. Spiegel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-11-01
Series:BMC Gastroenterology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12876-019-1097-7
id doaj-981474f5d63d406ca547dd2c6e44b024
record_format Article
spelling doaj-981474f5d63d406ca547dd2c6e44b0242020-11-25T04:07:18ZengBMCBMC Gastroenterology1471-230X2019-11-0119111110.1186/s12876-019-1097-7Patient and provider differences in the treatment of opioid-induced constipation: a qualitative studyMichelle S. Keller0Alma Jusufagic1Brennan M. R. Spiegel2Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterPenn State University College of MedicineDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterAbstract Background Patients using opioids to treat chronic non-cancer pain often experience side effects that may affect health-related quality of life (HRQOL). These side effects include opioid-induced constipation (OIC), sedation, dizziness, and nausea. OIC can significantly affect HRQOL for patients on a daily basis. However, it is not well understood whether patients and clinicians view OIC management similarly. Aims In this study, we sought to elucidate the decision-making process around managing OIC by assessing patient and provider treatment preferences, experiences, and communication regarding this condition. Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews with 33 clinicians, and held three focus groups with patients who were currently using or had used opioids for chronic non-cancer pain. We then analyzed transcribed interviews using descriptive qualitative methods based on grounded theory methodology. Results Clinicians recognized OIC as a concern but prioritized pain management over constipation. They focused on medication-based treatments for OIC, but also recommended lifestyle changes (e.g., diet) and reducing opioids to relieve symptoms. Patients reported using over-the-counter treatments, but the majority focused on diet-related constipation management. Patients reported not receiving adequate information from clinicians about OIC and relevant treatments. Cost of treatment was a major concern for both patients and clinicians. Conclusions Assessing experiences with and preferences for OIC treatment, including cost, ease of access, and side effects, could improve patient-provider communication and HRQOL. Quality improvement efforts can target uncovered misalignments between patients and clinicians to improve communication about opioid medication adverse effects and relevant treatment options, which may help improve quality of life for patients with chronic pain.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12876-019-1097-7Opioid-induced constipationChronic non-cancer painOpioidsConstipationPatient-clinician communication
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michelle S. Keller
Alma Jusufagic
Brennan M. R. Spiegel
spellingShingle Michelle S. Keller
Alma Jusufagic
Brennan M. R. Spiegel
Patient and provider differences in the treatment of opioid-induced constipation: a qualitative study
BMC Gastroenterology
Opioid-induced constipation
Chronic non-cancer pain
Opioids
Constipation
Patient-clinician communication
author_facet Michelle S. Keller
Alma Jusufagic
Brennan M. R. Spiegel
author_sort Michelle S. Keller
title Patient and provider differences in the treatment of opioid-induced constipation: a qualitative study
title_short Patient and provider differences in the treatment of opioid-induced constipation: a qualitative study
title_full Patient and provider differences in the treatment of opioid-induced constipation: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Patient and provider differences in the treatment of opioid-induced constipation: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Patient and provider differences in the treatment of opioid-induced constipation: a qualitative study
title_sort patient and provider differences in the treatment of opioid-induced constipation: a qualitative study
publisher BMC
series BMC Gastroenterology
issn 1471-230X
publishDate 2019-11-01
description Abstract Background Patients using opioids to treat chronic non-cancer pain often experience side effects that may affect health-related quality of life (HRQOL). These side effects include opioid-induced constipation (OIC), sedation, dizziness, and nausea. OIC can significantly affect HRQOL for patients on a daily basis. However, it is not well understood whether patients and clinicians view OIC management similarly. Aims In this study, we sought to elucidate the decision-making process around managing OIC by assessing patient and provider treatment preferences, experiences, and communication regarding this condition. Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews with 33 clinicians, and held three focus groups with patients who were currently using or had used opioids for chronic non-cancer pain. We then analyzed transcribed interviews using descriptive qualitative methods based on grounded theory methodology. Results Clinicians recognized OIC as a concern but prioritized pain management over constipation. They focused on medication-based treatments for OIC, but also recommended lifestyle changes (e.g., diet) and reducing opioids to relieve symptoms. Patients reported using over-the-counter treatments, but the majority focused on diet-related constipation management. Patients reported not receiving adequate information from clinicians about OIC and relevant treatments. Cost of treatment was a major concern for both patients and clinicians. Conclusions Assessing experiences with and preferences for OIC treatment, including cost, ease of access, and side effects, could improve patient-provider communication and HRQOL. Quality improvement efforts can target uncovered misalignments between patients and clinicians to improve communication about opioid medication adverse effects and relevant treatment options, which may help improve quality of life for patients with chronic pain.
topic Opioid-induced constipation
Chronic non-cancer pain
Opioids
Constipation
Patient-clinician communication
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12876-019-1097-7
work_keys_str_mv AT michelleskeller patientandproviderdifferencesinthetreatmentofopioidinducedconstipationaqualitativestudy
AT almajusufagic patientandproviderdifferencesinthetreatmentofopioidinducedconstipationaqualitativestudy
AT brennanmrspiegel patientandproviderdifferencesinthetreatmentofopioidinducedconstipationaqualitativestudy
_version_ 1724429336106237952