Patient and provider differences in the treatment of opioid-induced constipation: a qualitative study
Abstract Background Patients using opioids to treat chronic non-cancer pain often experience side effects that may affect health-related quality of life (HRQOL). These side effects include opioid-induced constipation (OIC), sedation, dizziness, and nausea. OIC can significantly affect HRQOL for pati...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2019-11-01
|
Series: | BMC Gastroenterology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12876-019-1097-7 |
id |
doaj-981474f5d63d406ca547dd2c6e44b024 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-981474f5d63d406ca547dd2c6e44b0242020-11-25T04:07:18ZengBMCBMC Gastroenterology1471-230X2019-11-0119111110.1186/s12876-019-1097-7Patient and provider differences in the treatment of opioid-induced constipation: a qualitative studyMichelle S. Keller0Alma Jusufagic1Brennan M. R. Spiegel2Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterPenn State University College of MedicineDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterAbstract Background Patients using opioids to treat chronic non-cancer pain often experience side effects that may affect health-related quality of life (HRQOL). These side effects include opioid-induced constipation (OIC), sedation, dizziness, and nausea. OIC can significantly affect HRQOL for patients on a daily basis. However, it is not well understood whether patients and clinicians view OIC management similarly. Aims In this study, we sought to elucidate the decision-making process around managing OIC by assessing patient and provider treatment preferences, experiences, and communication regarding this condition. Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews with 33 clinicians, and held three focus groups with patients who were currently using or had used opioids for chronic non-cancer pain. We then analyzed transcribed interviews using descriptive qualitative methods based on grounded theory methodology. Results Clinicians recognized OIC as a concern but prioritized pain management over constipation. They focused on medication-based treatments for OIC, but also recommended lifestyle changes (e.g., diet) and reducing opioids to relieve symptoms. Patients reported using over-the-counter treatments, but the majority focused on diet-related constipation management. Patients reported not receiving adequate information from clinicians about OIC and relevant treatments. Cost of treatment was a major concern for both patients and clinicians. Conclusions Assessing experiences with and preferences for OIC treatment, including cost, ease of access, and side effects, could improve patient-provider communication and HRQOL. Quality improvement efforts can target uncovered misalignments between patients and clinicians to improve communication about opioid medication adverse effects and relevant treatment options, which may help improve quality of life for patients with chronic pain.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12876-019-1097-7Opioid-induced constipationChronic non-cancer painOpioidsConstipationPatient-clinician communication |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Michelle S. Keller Alma Jusufagic Brennan M. R. Spiegel |
spellingShingle |
Michelle S. Keller Alma Jusufagic Brennan M. R. Spiegel Patient and provider differences in the treatment of opioid-induced constipation: a qualitative study BMC Gastroenterology Opioid-induced constipation Chronic non-cancer pain Opioids Constipation Patient-clinician communication |
author_facet |
Michelle S. Keller Alma Jusufagic Brennan M. R. Spiegel |
author_sort |
Michelle S. Keller |
title |
Patient and provider differences in the treatment of opioid-induced constipation: a qualitative study |
title_short |
Patient and provider differences in the treatment of opioid-induced constipation: a qualitative study |
title_full |
Patient and provider differences in the treatment of opioid-induced constipation: a qualitative study |
title_fullStr |
Patient and provider differences in the treatment of opioid-induced constipation: a qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Patient and provider differences in the treatment of opioid-induced constipation: a qualitative study |
title_sort |
patient and provider differences in the treatment of opioid-induced constipation: a qualitative study |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Gastroenterology |
issn |
1471-230X |
publishDate |
2019-11-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Patients using opioids to treat chronic non-cancer pain often experience side effects that may affect health-related quality of life (HRQOL). These side effects include opioid-induced constipation (OIC), sedation, dizziness, and nausea. OIC can significantly affect HRQOL for patients on a daily basis. However, it is not well understood whether patients and clinicians view OIC management similarly. Aims In this study, we sought to elucidate the decision-making process around managing OIC by assessing patient and provider treatment preferences, experiences, and communication regarding this condition. Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews with 33 clinicians, and held three focus groups with patients who were currently using or had used opioids for chronic non-cancer pain. We then analyzed transcribed interviews using descriptive qualitative methods based on grounded theory methodology. Results Clinicians recognized OIC as a concern but prioritized pain management over constipation. They focused on medication-based treatments for OIC, but also recommended lifestyle changes (e.g., diet) and reducing opioids to relieve symptoms. Patients reported using over-the-counter treatments, but the majority focused on diet-related constipation management. Patients reported not receiving adequate information from clinicians about OIC and relevant treatments. Cost of treatment was a major concern for both patients and clinicians. Conclusions Assessing experiences with and preferences for OIC treatment, including cost, ease of access, and side effects, could improve patient-provider communication and HRQOL. Quality improvement efforts can target uncovered misalignments between patients and clinicians to improve communication about opioid medication adverse effects and relevant treatment options, which may help improve quality of life for patients with chronic pain. |
topic |
Opioid-induced constipation Chronic non-cancer pain Opioids Constipation Patient-clinician communication |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12876-019-1097-7 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT michelleskeller patientandproviderdifferencesinthetreatmentofopioidinducedconstipationaqualitativestudy AT almajusufagic patientandproviderdifferencesinthetreatmentofopioidinducedconstipationaqualitativestudy AT brennanmrspiegel patientandproviderdifferencesinthetreatmentofopioidinducedconstipationaqualitativestudy |
_version_ |
1724429336106237952 |