Reliability and validity of the ESRD Symptom Checklist – Transplantation Module in Norwegian kidney transplant recipients
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The aim of the study was to validate the Norwegian version of a self-administered 43-item questionnaire designed to assess quality of life in kidney transplant recipients, the End-Stage Renal Disease Symptom Checklist – Transplantati...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2006-11-01
|
Series: | BMC Nephrology |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/7/17 |
id |
doaj-97f7648559354843a2fe03e7fce3a4ec |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-97f7648559354843a2fe03e7fce3a4ec2020-11-25T00:04:47ZengBMCBMC Nephrology1471-23692006-11-01711710.1186/1471-2369-7-17Reliability and validity of the ESRD Symptom Checklist – Transplantation Module in Norwegian kidney transplant recipientsStavem KnutGanss Rüdiger<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The aim of the study was to validate the Norwegian version of a self-administered 43-item questionnaire designed to assess quality of life in kidney transplant recipients, the End-Stage Renal Disease Symptom Checklist – Transplantation Module (ESRD-SCL).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In total, 53 kidney transplant recipients from one university-affiliated hospital responded to a questionnaire including the ESRD-SCL and the Short Form 36 (SF-36). We assessed internal consistency reliability and test-retest reliability with 2 weeks between assessments. Construct validity was assessed by correlations of the ESRD-SCL subscales with related and unrelated SF-36 scales, demographic, and clinical characteristics.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Subscales of the ESRD-SCL showed good internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's = 0.72–0.81) and for the aggregate total scale α was 0.94. Test-retest reliability median 14 days apart was excellent with intraclass coefficients ranging from 0.87 to 0.95. The pattern of correlations of the ESRD-SCL scales with related and unrelated scales SF-36 scales and demographic and clinical characteristics gave support to the construct validity of the ESRD-SCL.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The Norwegian translation of the ESRD-SCL showed satisfactory internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability and construct validity, at the level of the original German version.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/7/17 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Stavem Knut Ganss Rüdiger |
spellingShingle |
Stavem Knut Ganss Rüdiger Reliability and validity of the ESRD Symptom Checklist – Transplantation Module in Norwegian kidney transplant recipients BMC Nephrology |
author_facet |
Stavem Knut Ganss Rüdiger |
author_sort |
Stavem Knut |
title |
Reliability and validity of the ESRD Symptom Checklist – Transplantation Module in Norwegian kidney transplant recipients |
title_short |
Reliability and validity of the ESRD Symptom Checklist – Transplantation Module in Norwegian kidney transplant recipients |
title_full |
Reliability and validity of the ESRD Symptom Checklist – Transplantation Module in Norwegian kidney transplant recipients |
title_fullStr |
Reliability and validity of the ESRD Symptom Checklist – Transplantation Module in Norwegian kidney transplant recipients |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reliability and validity of the ESRD Symptom Checklist – Transplantation Module in Norwegian kidney transplant recipients |
title_sort |
reliability and validity of the esrd symptom checklist – transplantation module in norwegian kidney transplant recipients |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Nephrology |
issn |
1471-2369 |
publishDate |
2006-11-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The aim of the study was to validate the Norwegian version of a self-administered 43-item questionnaire designed to assess quality of life in kidney transplant recipients, the End-Stage Renal Disease Symptom Checklist – Transplantation Module (ESRD-SCL).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In total, 53 kidney transplant recipients from one university-affiliated hospital responded to a questionnaire including the ESRD-SCL and the Short Form 36 (SF-36). We assessed internal consistency reliability and test-retest reliability with 2 weeks between assessments. Construct validity was assessed by correlations of the ESRD-SCL subscales with related and unrelated SF-36 scales, demographic, and clinical characteristics.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Subscales of the ESRD-SCL showed good internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's = 0.72–0.81) and for the aggregate total scale α was 0.94. Test-retest reliability median 14 days apart was excellent with intraclass coefficients ranging from 0.87 to 0.95. The pattern of correlations of the ESRD-SCL scales with related and unrelated scales SF-36 scales and demographic and clinical characteristics gave support to the construct validity of the ESRD-SCL.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The Norwegian translation of the ESRD-SCL showed satisfactory internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability and construct validity, at the level of the original German version.</p> |
url |
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/7/17 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT stavemknut reliabilityandvalidityoftheesrdsymptomchecklisttransplantationmoduleinnorwegiankidneytransplantrecipients AT ganssrudiger reliabilityandvalidityoftheesrdsymptomchecklisttransplantationmoduleinnorwegiankidneytransplantrecipients |
_version_ |
1725427897022283776 |