Reliability and validity of the ESRD Symptom Checklist – Transplantation Module in Norwegian kidney transplant recipients

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The aim of the study was to validate the Norwegian version of a self-administered 43-item questionnaire designed to assess quality of life in kidney transplant recipients, the End-Stage Renal Disease Symptom Checklist – Transplantati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stavem Knut, Ganss Rüdiger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2006-11-01
Series:BMC Nephrology
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/7/17
id doaj-97f7648559354843a2fe03e7fce3a4ec
record_format Article
spelling doaj-97f7648559354843a2fe03e7fce3a4ec2020-11-25T00:04:47ZengBMCBMC Nephrology1471-23692006-11-01711710.1186/1471-2369-7-17Reliability and validity of the ESRD Symptom Checklist – Transplantation Module in Norwegian kidney transplant recipientsStavem KnutGanss Rüdiger<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The aim of the study was to validate the Norwegian version of a self-administered 43-item questionnaire designed to assess quality of life in kidney transplant recipients, the End-Stage Renal Disease Symptom Checklist – Transplantation Module (ESRD-SCL).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In total, 53 kidney transplant recipients from one university-affiliated hospital responded to a questionnaire including the ESRD-SCL and the Short Form 36 (SF-36). We assessed internal consistency reliability and test-retest reliability with 2 weeks between assessments. Construct validity was assessed by correlations of the ESRD-SCL subscales with related and unrelated SF-36 scales, demographic, and clinical characteristics.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Subscales of the ESRD-SCL showed good internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's = 0.72–0.81) and for the aggregate total scale α was 0.94. Test-retest reliability median 14 days apart was excellent with intraclass coefficients ranging from 0.87 to 0.95. The pattern of correlations of the ESRD-SCL scales with related and unrelated scales SF-36 scales and demographic and clinical characteristics gave support to the construct validity of the ESRD-SCL.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The Norwegian translation of the ESRD-SCL showed satisfactory internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability and construct validity, at the level of the original German version.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/7/17
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stavem Knut
Ganss Rüdiger
spellingShingle Stavem Knut
Ganss Rüdiger
Reliability and validity of the ESRD Symptom Checklist – Transplantation Module in Norwegian kidney transplant recipients
BMC Nephrology
author_facet Stavem Knut
Ganss Rüdiger
author_sort Stavem Knut
title Reliability and validity of the ESRD Symptom Checklist – Transplantation Module in Norwegian kidney transplant recipients
title_short Reliability and validity of the ESRD Symptom Checklist – Transplantation Module in Norwegian kidney transplant recipients
title_full Reliability and validity of the ESRD Symptom Checklist – Transplantation Module in Norwegian kidney transplant recipients
title_fullStr Reliability and validity of the ESRD Symptom Checklist – Transplantation Module in Norwegian kidney transplant recipients
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and validity of the ESRD Symptom Checklist – Transplantation Module in Norwegian kidney transplant recipients
title_sort reliability and validity of the esrd symptom checklist – transplantation module in norwegian kidney transplant recipients
publisher BMC
series BMC Nephrology
issn 1471-2369
publishDate 2006-11-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The aim of the study was to validate the Norwegian version of a self-administered 43-item questionnaire designed to assess quality of life in kidney transplant recipients, the End-Stage Renal Disease Symptom Checklist – Transplantation Module (ESRD-SCL).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In total, 53 kidney transplant recipients from one university-affiliated hospital responded to a questionnaire including the ESRD-SCL and the Short Form 36 (SF-36). We assessed internal consistency reliability and test-retest reliability with 2 weeks between assessments. Construct validity was assessed by correlations of the ESRD-SCL subscales with related and unrelated SF-36 scales, demographic, and clinical characteristics.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Subscales of the ESRD-SCL showed good internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's = 0.72–0.81) and for the aggregate total scale α was 0.94. Test-retest reliability median 14 days apart was excellent with intraclass coefficients ranging from 0.87 to 0.95. The pattern of correlations of the ESRD-SCL scales with related and unrelated scales SF-36 scales and demographic and clinical characteristics gave support to the construct validity of the ESRD-SCL.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The Norwegian translation of the ESRD-SCL showed satisfactory internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability and construct validity, at the level of the original German version.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2369/7/17
work_keys_str_mv AT stavemknut reliabilityandvalidityoftheesrdsymptomchecklisttransplantationmoduleinnorwegiankidneytransplantrecipients
AT ganssrudiger reliabilityandvalidityoftheesrdsymptomchecklisttransplantationmoduleinnorwegiankidneytransplantrecipients
_version_ 1725427897022283776