Numerical simulation of micron and submicron droplets in jet impinging

Micron droplet deposition onto a wall in an impinging jet is important for various applications like spray cooling, coating, fuel injection, and erosion. The impinging process is featured by abrupt velocity changes and thus complicated behaviors of the droplets. Either modeling or experiment for the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jiandong Wu, Jiyun Xu, Hao Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2018-10-01
Series:Advances in Mechanical Engineering
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814018805319
id doaj-97efe633d7994c50872e6fa0edcef686
record_format Article
spelling doaj-97efe633d7994c50872e6fa0edcef6862020-11-25T02:59:56ZengSAGE PublishingAdvances in Mechanical Engineering1687-81402018-10-011010.1177/1687814018805319Numerical simulation of micron and submicron droplets in jet impingingJiandong WuJiyun XuHao WangMicron droplet deposition onto a wall in an impinging jet is important for various applications like spray cooling, coating, fuel injection, and erosion. The impinging process is featured by abrupt velocity changes and thus complicated behaviors of the droplets. Either modeling or experiment for the droplet behaviors is still challenging. This study conducted numerical modeling and compared with an existing experiment in which concentric dual-ring deposition patterns of micron droplets were observed on the impinging plate. The modeling fully took into account of the droplet motion in the turbulent flow, the collision between the droplets and the plate, as well as the collision, that is, agglomeration among droplets. Different turbulence models, that is, the v 2 − f model, standard k–ε model, and Reynolds stress model, were compared. The results show that the k–ε model failed to capture the turbulent flow structures and overpredicted the turbulent fluctuations near the wall. Reynolds stress model had a good performance in flow field simulation but still failed to reproduce the dual-ring deposition pattern. Only the v 2 − f model reproduced the dual-ring pattern when coupled with droplet collision models. The results echoed the excellent performance of the v 2 − f model in the heat transfer calculation for the impinging problems. The agglomeration among droplets has insignificant influence on the deposition.https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814018805319
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jiandong Wu
Jiyun Xu
Hao Wang
spellingShingle Jiandong Wu
Jiyun Xu
Hao Wang
Numerical simulation of micron and submicron droplets in jet impinging
Advances in Mechanical Engineering
author_facet Jiandong Wu
Jiyun Xu
Hao Wang
author_sort Jiandong Wu
title Numerical simulation of micron and submicron droplets in jet impinging
title_short Numerical simulation of micron and submicron droplets in jet impinging
title_full Numerical simulation of micron and submicron droplets in jet impinging
title_fullStr Numerical simulation of micron and submicron droplets in jet impinging
title_full_unstemmed Numerical simulation of micron and submicron droplets in jet impinging
title_sort numerical simulation of micron and submicron droplets in jet impinging
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Advances in Mechanical Engineering
issn 1687-8140
publishDate 2018-10-01
description Micron droplet deposition onto a wall in an impinging jet is important for various applications like spray cooling, coating, fuel injection, and erosion. The impinging process is featured by abrupt velocity changes and thus complicated behaviors of the droplets. Either modeling or experiment for the droplet behaviors is still challenging. This study conducted numerical modeling and compared with an existing experiment in which concentric dual-ring deposition patterns of micron droplets were observed on the impinging plate. The modeling fully took into account of the droplet motion in the turbulent flow, the collision between the droplets and the plate, as well as the collision, that is, agglomeration among droplets. Different turbulence models, that is, the v 2 − f model, standard k–ε model, and Reynolds stress model, were compared. The results show that the k–ε model failed to capture the turbulent flow structures and overpredicted the turbulent fluctuations near the wall. Reynolds stress model had a good performance in flow field simulation but still failed to reproduce the dual-ring deposition pattern. Only the v 2 − f model reproduced the dual-ring pattern when coupled with droplet collision models. The results echoed the excellent performance of the v 2 − f model in the heat transfer calculation for the impinging problems. The agglomeration among droplets has insignificant influence on the deposition.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814018805319
work_keys_str_mv AT jiandongwu numericalsimulationofmicronandsubmicrondropletsinjetimpinging
AT jiyunxu numericalsimulationofmicronandsubmicrondropletsinjetimpinging
AT haowang numericalsimulationofmicronandsubmicrondropletsinjetimpinging
_version_ 1724700202228514816