Qualitative species vulnerability: Model sensitivity to climate and spatial parameters
Natural resource managers model plant and animal climate vulnerability to efficiently plan and prioritize conservation actions. We assessed a commonly used online decision support tool, NatureServe’s Climate Change Vulnerability Index (CCVI) and its sensitivity to different generations of climate mo...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2021-04-01
|
Series: | Climate Services |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405880721000054 |
id |
doaj-97e5ae12ddb1451d82b8f088ebdd4fd5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-97e5ae12ddb1451d82b8f088ebdd4fd52021-06-25T04:49:29ZengElsevierClimate Services2405-88072021-04-0122100217Qualitative species vulnerability: Model sensitivity to climate and spatial parametersKerry L. Griffis-Kyle0Krista Mougey1Sharmistha Swain2Joseph Drake3Matt Vanlandeghem4Department of Natural Resources Management, Texas Tech University, Box 2125, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA; Corresponding author.Department of Natural Resources Management, Texas Tech University, Box 2125, Lubbock, TX 79409, USAClimate Science Center, Texas Tech University, 2500 Broadway, Lubbock, TX 79409, USADepartment of Natural Resources Management, Texas Tech University, Box 2125, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA; Department of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts, 160 Holdsworth Way, Amherst, MA 01003, USADepartment of Natural Resources Management, Texas Tech University, Box 2125, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA; The Nielsen Company, 200 W. Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, IL 60606, USANatural resource managers model plant and animal climate vulnerability to efficiently plan and prioritize conservation actions. We assessed a commonly used online decision support tool, NatureServe’s Climate Change Vulnerability Index (CCVI) and its sensitivity to different generations of climate models, socioeconomic climate scenarios, and different types and scales of spatial data. Our goal was to help mangers better interpret CCVI species vulnerability rankings and provide a workflow for generating the required climate metrics when those data are not already calculated. We found vulnerability scores were much larger when using an older generation as compared to a newer generation of climate projections, especially for water associated species. Socioeconomic climate scenarios were very important and resulted in differences of 130% between optimistic and pessimistic scenarios. Hence, we caution when comparing across studies to consider the generation of climate models and scenarios because the scores may not be directly comparable. The online tool was robust to the type and scale of spatial data. However, this data is only applied in calculating exposure and is not included in species specific sensitivity via adaptive capacity. Consequently, we suggest that managers use range size as an index of adaptive capacity when interpreting similar scores. Overall, we find the species climate vulnerability model supported by NatureServe a valuable and robust assessment that is easy to use and provides an objective method for prioritizing conservation action and justifying these actions to policy makers and the general public.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405880721000054Climate vulnerabilityClimate modelsSpatial scaleClimate changeCCVIHerpetofauna |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kerry L. Griffis-Kyle Krista Mougey Sharmistha Swain Joseph Drake Matt Vanlandeghem |
spellingShingle |
Kerry L. Griffis-Kyle Krista Mougey Sharmistha Swain Joseph Drake Matt Vanlandeghem Qualitative species vulnerability: Model sensitivity to climate and spatial parameters Climate Services Climate vulnerability Climate models Spatial scale Climate change CCVI Herpetofauna |
author_facet |
Kerry L. Griffis-Kyle Krista Mougey Sharmistha Swain Joseph Drake Matt Vanlandeghem |
author_sort |
Kerry L. Griffis-Kyle |
title |
Qualitative species vulnerability: Model sensitivity to climate and spatial parameters |
title_short |
Qualitative species vulnerability: Model sensitivity to climate and spatial parameters |
title_full |
Qualitative species vulnerability: Model sensitivity to climate and spatial parameters |
title_fullStr |
Qualitative species vulnerability: Model sensitivity to climate and spatial parameters |
title_full_unstemmed |
Qualitative species vulnerability: Model sensitivity to climate and spatial parameters |
title_sort |
qualitative species vulnerability: model sensitivity to climate and spatial parameters |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Climate Services |
issn |
2405-8807 |
publishDate |
2021-04-01 |
description |
Natural resource managers model plant and animal climate vulnerability to efficiently plan and prioritize conservation actions. We assessed a commonly used online decision support tool, NatureServe’s Climate Change Vulnerability Index (CCVI) and its sensitivity to different generations of climate models, socioeconomic climate scenarios, and different types and scales of spatial data. Our goal was to help mangers better interpret CCVI species vulnerability rankings and provide a workflow for generating the required climate metrics when those data are not already calculated. We found vulnerability scores were much larger when using an older generation as compared to a newer generation of climate projections, especially for water associated species. Socioeconomic climate scenarios were very important and resulted in differences of 130% between optimistic and pessimistic scenarios. Hence, we caution when comparing across studies to consider the generation of climate models and scenarios because the scores may not be directly comparable. The online tool was robust to the type and scale of spatial data. However, this data is only applied in calculating exposure and is not included in species specific sensitivity via adaptive capacity. Consequently, we suggest that managers use range size as an index of adaptive capacity when interpreting similar scores. Overall, we find the species climate vulnerability model supported by NatureServe a valuable and robust assessment that is easy to use and provides an objective method for prioritizing conservation action and justifying these actions to policy makers and the general public. |
topic |
Climate vulnerability Climate models Spatial scale Climate change CCVI Herpetofauna |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405880721000054 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kerrylgriffiskyle qualitativespeciesvulnerabilitymodelsensitivitytoclimateandspatialparameters AT kristamougey qualitativespeciesvulnerabilitymodelsensitivitytoclimateandspatialparameters AT sharmisthaswain qualitativespeciesvulnerabilitymodelsensitivitytoclimateandspatialparameters AT josephdrake qualitativespeciesvulnerabilitymodelsensitivitytoclimateandspatialparameters AT mattvanlandeghem qualitativespeciesvulnerabilitymodelsensitivitytoclimateandspatialparameters |
_version_ |
1721360656962158592 |