The Locomotor Capabilities Index; validity and reliability of the Swedish version in adults with lower limb amputation

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The Locomotor Capabilities Index (LCI) is a validated measure of lower-limb amputees' ability to perform activities with prosthesis. We have developed the LCI Swedish version and evaluated its validity and reliability.</p>...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andersson Ingemar H, Johannesson Anton, Larsson Brita, Atroshi Isam
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-05-01
Series:Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Online Access:http://www.hqlo.com/content/7/1/44
id doaj-97de9db5f4794860b73091c20dbd7668
record_format Article
spelling doaj-97de9db5f4794860b73091c20dbd76682020-11-25T01:32:31ZengBMCHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes1477-75252009-05-01714410.1186/1477-7525-7-44The Locomotor Capabilities Index; validity and reliability of the Swedish version in adults with lower limb amputationAndersson Ingemar HJohannesson AntonLarsson BritaAtroshi Isam<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The Locomotor Capabilities Index (LCI) is a validated measure of lower-limb amputees' ability to perform activities with prosthesis. We have developed the LCI Swedish version and evaluated its validity and reliability.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Cross-cultural adaptation to Swedish included forward/backward translations and field testing. The Swedish LCI was then administered to 144 amputees (55 women), mean age 74 (40–93) years, attending post-rehabilitation prosthetic training. Construct validity was assessed by examining the relationship between the LCI and Timed "Up-and-Go" (TUG) test and between the LCI and EQ-5D health utility index in 2 subgroups of 40 and 20 amputees, respectively. Discriminative validity was assessed by comparing scores in different age groups and in unilateral and bilateral amputees. Test-retest reliability (1–2 weeks) was evaluated in 20 amputees (14 unilateral).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The Swedish LCI showed good construct convergent validity, with high correlation with the TUG (r = -0.75) and the EQ-5D (r = 0.84), and discriminative validity, with significantly worse mean scores for older than younger and for bilateral than unilateral amputees (p < 0.01), and high internal consistency (Cronbach alpha 0.95). In test-retest reliability the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.91 (95% CI 0.79–0.96) but for the unilateral amputees was 0.83 (95% CI 0.56–0.94). Ceiling effect occurred in 23%.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The Swedish version of the LCI demonstrated good validity and internal consistency in adult amputees. Test-retest reliability in a small subsample appears to be acceptable. The high ceiling effect of the LCI may imply that it would be most useful in assessing amputees with low to moderate functional abilities.</p> http://www.hqlo.com/content/7/1/44
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andersson Ingemar H
Johannesson Anton
Larsson Brita
Atroshi Isam
spellingShingle Andersson Ingemar H
Johannesson Anton
Larsson Brita
Atroshi Isam
The Locomotor Capabilities Index; validity and reliability of the Swedish version in adults with lower limb amputation
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
author_facet Andersson Ingemar H
Johannesson Anton
Larsson Brita
Atroshi Isam
author_sort Andersson Ingemar H
title The Locomotor Capabilities Index; validity and reliability of the Swedish version in adults with lower limb amputation
title_short The Locomotor Capabilities Index; validity and reliability of the Swedish version in adults with lower limb amputation
title_full The Locomotor Capabilities Index; validity and reliability of the Swedish version in adults with lower limb amputation
title_fullStr The Locomotor Capabilities Index; validity and reliability of the Swedish version in adults with lower limb amputation
title_full_unstemmed The Locomotor Capabilities Index; validity and reliability of the Swedish version in adults with lower limb amputation
title_sort locomotor capabilities index; validity and reliability of the swedish version in adults with lower limb amputation
publisher BMC
series Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
issn 1477-7525
publishDate 2009-05-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The Locomotor Capabilities Index (LCI) is a validated measure of lower-limb amputees' ability to perform activities with prosthesis. We have developed the LCI Swedish version and evaluated its validity and reliability.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Cross-cultural adaptation to Swedish included forward/backward translations and field testing. The Swedish LCI was then administered to 144 amputees (55 women), mean age 74 (40–93) years, attending post-rehabilitation prosthetic training. Construct validity was assessed by examining the relationship between the LCI and Timed "Up-and-Go" (TUG) test and between the LCI and EQ-5D health utility index in 2 subgroups of 40 and 20 amputees, respectively. Discriminative validity was assessed by comparing scores in different age groups and in unilateral and bilateral amputees. Test-retest reliability (1–2 weeks) was evaluated in 20 amputees (14 unilateral).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The Swedish LCI showed good construct convergent validity, with high correlation with the TUG (r = -0.75) and the EQ-5D (r = 0.84), and discriminative validity, with significantly worse mean scores for older than younger and for bilateral than unilateral amputees (p < 0.01), and high internal consistency (Cronbach alpha 0.95). In test-retest reliability the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.91 (95% CI 0.79–0.96) but for the unilateral amputees was 0.83 (95% CI 0.56–0.94). Ceiling effect occurred in 23%.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The Swedish version of the LCI demonstrated good validity and internal consistency in adult amputees. Test-retest reliability in a small subsample appears to be acceptable. The high ceiling effect of the LCI may imply that it would be most useful in assessing amputees with low to moderate functional abilities.</p>
url http://www.hqlo.com/content/7/1/44
work_keys_str_mv AT anderssoningemarh thelocomotorcapabilitiesindexvalidityandreliabilityoftheswedishversioninadultswithlowerlimbamputation
AT johannessonanton thelocomotorcapabilitiesindexvalidityandreliabilityoftheswedishversioninadultswithlowerlimbamputation
AT larssonbrita thelocomotorcapabilitiesindexvalidityandreliabilityoftheswedishversioninadultswithlowerlimbamputation
AT atroshiisam thelocomotorcapabilitiesindexvalidityandreliabilityoftheswedishversioninadultswithlowerlimbamputation
AT anderssoningemarh locomotorcapabilitiesindexvalidityandreliabilityoftheswedishversioninadultswithlowerlimbamputation
AT johannessonanton locomotorcapabilitiesindexvalidityandreliabilityoftheswedishversioninadultswithlowerlimbamputation
AT larssonbrita locomotorcapabilitiesindexvalidityandreliabilityoftheswedishversioninadultswithlowerlimbamputation
AT atroshiisam locomotorcapabilitiesindexvalidityandreliabilityoftheswedishversioninadultswithlowerlimbamputation
_version_ 1725081514459267072