Stratospheric geoengineering impacts on El Niño/Southern Oscillation

To examine the impact of proposed stratospheric geoengineering schemes on the amplitude and frequency of El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) variations we examine climate model simulations from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) G1–G4 experiments. Here we compare tropical Paci...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C. J. Gabriel, A. Robock
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2015-10-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/11949/2015/acp-15-11949-2015.pdf
id doaj-97cff903216e4241888c007162fa06b5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-97cff903216e4241888c007162fa06b52020-11-24T22:38:52ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242015-10-011520119491196610.5194/acp-15-11949-2015Stratospheric geoengineering impacts on El Niño/Southern OscillationC. J. Gabriel0A. Robock1Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USADepartment of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USATo examine the impact of proposed stratospheric geoengineering schemes on the amplitude and frequency of El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) variations we examine climate model simulations from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) G1–G4 experiments. Here we compare tropical Pacific behavior under anthropogenic global warming (AGW) using several scenarios: an instantaneous quadrupling of the atmosphere's CO<sub>2</sub> concentration, a 1 % annual increase in CO<sub>2</sub> concentration, and the representative concentration pathway resulting in 4.5 W m<sup>−2</sup> radiative forcing at the end of the 21st century, the Representative Concentration Pathway 4.5 scenario, with that under G1–G4 and under historical model simulations. Climate models under AGW project relatively uniform warming across the tropical Pacific over the next several decades. We find no statistically significant change in ENSO frequency or amplitude under stratospheric geoengineering as compared with those that would occur under ongoing AGW, although the relative brevity of the G1–G4 simulations may have limited detectability of such changes. We also find that the amplitude and frequency of ENSO events do not vary significantly under either AGW scenarios or G1–G4 from the variability found within historical simulations or observations going back to the mid-19th century. Finally, while warming of the Niño3.4 region in the tropical Pacific is fully offset in G1 and G2 during the 40-year simulations, the region continues to warm significantly in G3 and G4, which both start from a present-day climate.http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/11949/2015/acp-15-11949-2015.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author C. J. Gabriel
A. Robock
spellingShingle C. J. Gabriel
A. Robock
Stratospheric geoengineering impacts on El Niño/Southern Oscillation
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
author_facet C. J. Gabriel
A. Robock
author_sort C. J. Gabriel
title Stratospheric geoengineering impacts on El Niño/Southern Oscillation
title_short Stratospheric geoengineering impacts on El Niño/Southern Oscillation
title_full Stratospheric geoengineering impacts on El Niño/Southern Oscillation
title_fullStr Stratospheric geoengineering impacts on El Niño/Southern Oscillation
title_full_unstemmed Stratospheric geoengineering impacts on El Niño/Southern Oscillation
title_sort stratospheric geoengineering impacts on el niño/southern oscillation
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
publishDate 2015-10-01
description To examine the impact of proposed stratospheric geoengineering schemes on the amplitude and frequency of El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) variations we examine climate model simulations from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) G1–G4 experiments. Here we compare tropical Pacific behavior under anthropogenic global warming (AGW) using several scenarios: an instantaneous quadrupling of the atmosphere's CO<sub>2</sub> concentration, a 1 % annual increase in CO<sub>2</sub> concentration, and the representative concentration pathway resulting in 4.5 W m<sup>−2</sup> radiative forcing at the end of the 21st century, the Representative Concentration Pathway 4.5 scenario, with that under G1–G4 and under historical model simulations. Climate models under AGW project relatively uniform warming across the tropical Pacific over the next several decades. We find no statistically significant change in ENSO frequency or amplitude under stratospheric geoengineering as compared with those that would occur under ongoing AGW, although the relative brevity of the G1–G4 simulations may have limited detectability of such changes. We also find that the amplitude and frequency of ENSO events do not vary significantly under either AGW scenarios or G1–G4 from the variability found within historical simulations or observations going back to the mid-19th century. Finally, while warming of the Niño3.4 region in the tropical Pacific is fully offset in G1 and G2 during the 40-year simulations, the region continues to warm significantly in G3 and G4, which both start from a present-day climate.
url http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/11949/2015/acp-15-11949-2015.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT cjgabriel stratosphericgeoengineeringimpactsonelninosouthernoscillation
AT arobock stratosphericgeoengineeringimpactsonelninosouthernoscillation
_version_ 1725711398472777728