No Grist for Mill on Natural Kinds

According to the standard narrative, natural kind is a technical notion that was introduced by John Stuart Mill in the 1840s and the recent craze for natural kinds, launched by Putnam and Kripke, is a continuation of that tradition. I argue that the standard narrative is mistaken. The Millian tradit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: P.D. Magnus
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MULPress 2014-01-01
Series:Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy
Online Access:https://jhaponline.org/jhap/article/view/35
id doaj-97ad28de4c2b4ea38afc8316c16ef3db
record_format Article
spelling doaj-97ad28de4c2b4ea38afc8316c16ef3db2020-11-25T04:00:19ZengMULPressJournal for the History of Analytical Philosophy2159-03032014-01-012410.15173/jhap.v2i4.35No Grist for Mill on Natural KindsP.D. MagnusAccording to the standard narrative, natural kind is a technical notion that was introduced by John Stuart Mill in the 1840s and the recent craze for natural kinds, launched by Putnam and Kripke, is a continuation of that tradition. I argue that the standard narrative is mistaken. The Millian tradition of kinds was not particularly influential in the 20th century, and the Putnam-Kripke revolution did not clearly engage with even the remnants that were left of it. The presently active tradition of natural kinds is less than half a century old. Recognizing this might help us better appreciate both Mill and natural kinds.https://jhaponline.org/jhap/article/view/35
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author P.D. Magnus
spellingShingle P.D. Magnus
No Grist for Mill on Natural Kinds
Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy
author_facet P.D. Magnus
author_sort P.D. Magnus
title No Grist for Mill on Natural Kinds
title_short No Grist for Mill on Natural Kinds
title_full No Grist for Mill on Natural Kinds
title_fullStr No Grist for Mill on Natural Kinds
title_full_unstemmed No Grist for Mill on Natural Kinds
title_sort no grist for mill on natural kinds
publisher MULPress
series Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy
issn 2159-0303
publishDate 2014-01-01
description According to the standard narrative, natural kind is a technical notion that was introduced by John Stuart Mill in the 1840s and the recent craze for natural kinds, launched by Putnam and Kripke, is a continuation of that tradition. I argue that the standard narrative is mistaken. The Millian tradition of kinds was not particularly influential in the 20th century, and the Putnam-Kripke revolution did not clearly engage with even the remnants that were left of it. The presently active tradition of natural kinds is less than half a century old. Recognizing this might help us better appreciate both Mill and natural kinds.
url https://jhaponline.org/jhap/article/view/35
work_keys_str_mv AT pdmagnus nogristformillonnaturalkinds
_version_ 1724451391607406592