No Grist for Mill on Natural Kinds
According to the standard narrative, natural kind is a technical notion that was introduced by John Stuart Mill in the 1840s and the recent craze for natural kinds, launched by Putnam and Kripke, is a continuation of that tradition. I argue that the standard narrative is mistaken. The Millian tradit...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MULPress
2014-01-01
|
Series: | Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy |
Online Access: | https://jhaponline.org/jhap/article/view/35 |
id |
doaj-97ad28de4c2b4ea38afc8316c16ef3db |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-97ad28de4c2b4ea38afc8316c16ef3db2020-11-25T04:00:19ZengMULPressJournal for the History of Analytical Philosophy2159-03032014-01-012410.15173/jhap.v2i4.35No Grist for Mill on Natural KindsP.D. MagnusAccording to the standard narrative, natural kind is a technical notion that was introduced by John Stuart Mill in the 1840s and the recent craze for natural kinds, launched by Putnam and Kripke, is a continuation of that tradition. I argue that the standard narrative is mistaken. The Millian tradition of kinds was not particularly influential in the 20th century, and the Putnam-Kripke revolution did not clearly engage with even the remnants that were left of it. The presently active tradition of natural kinds is less than half a century old. Recognizing this might help us better appreciate both Mill and natural kinds.https://jhaponline.org/jhap/article/view/35 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
P.D. Magnus |
spellingShingle |
P.D. Magnus No Grist for Mill on Natural Kinds Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy |
author_facet |
P.D. Magnus |
author_sort |
P.D. Magnus |
title |
No Grist for Mill on Natural Kinds |
title_short |
No Grist for Mill on Natural Kinds |
title_full |
No Grist for Mill on Natural Kinds |
title_fullStr |
No Grist for Mill on Natural Kinds |
title_full_unstemmed |
No Grist for Mill on Natural Kinds |
title_sort |
no grist for mill on natural kinds |
publisher |
MULPress |
series |
Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy |
issn |
2159-0303 |
publishDate |
2014-01-01 |
description |
According to the standard narrative, natural kind is a technical notion that was introduced by John Stuart Mill in the 1840s and the recent craze for natural kinds, launched by Putnam and Kripke, is a continuation of that tradition. I argue that the standard narrative is mistaken. The Millian tradition of kinds was not particularly influential in the 20th century, and the Putnam-Kripke revolution did not clearly engage with even the remnants that were left of it. The presently active tradition of natural kinds is less than half a century old. Recognizing this might help us better appreciate both Mill and natural kinds. |
url |
https://jhaponline.org/jhap/article/view/35 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT pdmagnus nogristformillonnaturalkinds |
_version_ |
1724451391607406592 |