Effectiveness and safety of physician–pharmacist collaborative care for rheumatoid arthritis patients: The Changi General Hospital’s experience
Background: Increasing demand for follow-up of rheumatoid arthritis has encouraged pharmacists to collaborate with physicians to assist with patient care. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of the collaborative care model in a rheumatoid arthritis clinic. Met...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2019-09-01
|
Series: | Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2010105819839078 |
Summary: | Background: Increasing demand for follow-up of rheumatoid arthritis has encouraged pharmacists to collaborate with physicians to assist with patient care. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of the collaborative care model in a rheumatoid arthritis clinic. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patient case notes and medication records from March 2013 to February 2016. The effectiveness and safety of collaborative care was examined in pre-implementation (standard care) versus post-implementation (collaborative care) cohorts. All patients were assessed for 12 months. Effectiveness of clinic was measured using the percentage of patients that achieved optimal doses of non-biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nb-DMARDs). Clinic safety performance was evaluated based on the percentage of patients in each cohort that achieved compliance to in-house hospital guidelines on nb-DMARD monitoring. Other clinic safety factors monitored included the incidence and characteristics of nb-DMARD-associated adverse drug events. Results: Thirty-eight patients who had received standard care and collaborative care were reviewed. More patients receiving collaborative care achieved nb-DMARD dose optimization within a year of initiation of therapy (68.4% vs 39.5%; p -value < 0.05). Compliance to safety recommendations from hospital guidelines on nb-DMARD monitoring was significantly higher in the collaborative care group (70.6% vs 44.1%; p -value < 0.05). Collaborative care resulted in a higher incidence of nb-DMARD-associated adverse drug events being detected (26.3% vs 18.4%; p -value < 0.05). The most common adverse drug events were gastrointestinal (29.4%), dermatological (17.6%), and hematologic (17.6%), the majority being mild in severity. Conclusion: Collaborative rheumatoid arthritis care contributed to improvements in nb-DMARD dose optimization, compliance to hospital guidelines on monitoring, and the detection of nb-DMARD-related adverse drug events. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2010-1058 2059-2329 |