Factors influencing recruitment and retention of participants in clinical studies conducted at a tertiary referral center: A five-year audit

Introduction: A key determinant of the success of any study is the recruitment and subsequent retention of participants. Screen failure and dropouts impact both the scientific validity and financial viability of any study. We carried out this audit with the objective of evaluating the recruitment an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Debdipta Bose, Shruti Saha, Unnati Saxena, Harshad Kesari, Urmila M Thatte, Nithya J Gogtay
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2020-01-01
Series:Perspectives in Clinical Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.picronline.org/article.asp?issn=2229-3485;year=2020;volume=11;issue=2;spage=81;epage=85;aulast=Bose
id doaj-977d69a6c329479bb722ee222f9d26c0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-977d69a6c329479bb722ee222f9d26c02020-11-25T03:23:26ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsPerspectives in Clinical Research2229-34852020-01-01112818510.4103/picr.PICR_198_18Factors influencing recruitment and retention of participants in clinical studies conducted at a tertiary referral center: A five-year auditDebdipta BoseShruti SahaUnnati SaxenaHarshad KesariUrmila M ThatteNithya J GogtayIntroduction: A key determinant of the success of any study is the recruitment and subsequent retention of participants. Screen failure and dropouts impact both the scientific validity and financial viability of any study. We carried out this audit with the objective of evaluating the recruitment and retention of participants in clinical studies conducted over the last five years at our center. Methods: Studies completed between 2014 and 2018 at our center were included. Screening ledgers and study trackers were hand searched for screen failures and dropouts. Four pre-identified predictors were evaluated – risk as per the classification of Indian Council of Medical Research 2017 Ethical Guideline, nature of funding, study design, and nature of participants. Association of the predictors with screen failures and dropouts was determined using crude odds ratios along with 95% confidence intervals. All analyses were done at 5% significance using Microsoft Excel 2016. Results: A total of n = 19 completed studies had n = 2567 screened and n = 2442 enrolled participants with a screen failure and dropout rate of 5% and 4%, respectively. We found 59% screen failures due to abnormal laboratory values. The main reasons for dropouts were lost to follow-up 86 (88%). High-risk and interventional studies were the predictors for both screen failures and dropouts, but pharmaceutical industry-funded studies and healthy participants were predictors for only screen failures. Conclusion: Risk, funding, study design, and nature of participants are important to be considered while planning studies to minimize screen failures and dropouts.http://www.picronline.org/article.asp?issn=2229-3485;year=2020;volume=11;issue=2;spage=81;epage=85;aulast=Bosedropoutshealthy participantshigh-risk studiespharmaceutical industry-funded studiesscreen failures
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Debdipta Bose
Shruti Saha
Unnati Saxena
Harshad Kesari
Urmila M Thatte
Nithya J Gogtay
spellingShingle Debdipta Bose
Shruti Saha
Unnati Saxena
Harshad Kesari
Urmila M Thatte
Nithya J Gogtay
Factors influencing recruitment and retention of participants in clinical studies conducted at a tertiary referral center: A five-year audit
Perspectives in Clinical Research
dropouts
healthy participants
high-risk studies
pharmaceutical industry-funded studies
screen failures
author_facet Debdipta Bose
Shruti Saha
Unnati Saxena
Harshad Kesari
Urmila M Thatte
Nithya J Gogtay
author_sort Debdipta Bose
title Factors influencing recruitment and retention of participants in clinical studies conducted at a tertiary referral center: A five-year audit
title_short Factors influencing recruitment and retention of participants in clinical studies conducted at a tertiary referral center: A five-year audit
title_full Factors influencing recruitment and retention of participants in clinical studies conducted at a tertiary referral center: A five-year audit
title_fullStr Factors influencing recruitment and retention of participants in clinical studies conducted at a tertiary referral center: A five-year audit
title_full_unstemmed Factors influencing recruitment and retention of participants in clinical studies conducted at a tertiary referral center: A five-year audit
title_sort factors influencing recruitment and retention of participants in clinical studies conducted at a tertiary referral center: a five-year audit
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Perspectives in Clinical Research
issn 2229-3485
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Introduction: A key determinant of the success of any study is the recruitment and subsequent retention of participants. Screen failure and dropouts impact both the scientific validity and financial viability of any study. We carried out this audit with the objective of evaluating the recruitment and retention of participants in clinical studies conducted over the last five years at our center. Methods: Studies completed between 2014 and 2018 at our center were included. Screening ledgers and study trackers were hand searched for screen failures and dropouts. Four pre-identified predictors were evaluated – risk as per the classification of Indian Council of Medical Research 2017 Ethical Guideline, nature of funding, study design, and nature of participants. Association of the predictors with screen failures and dropouts was determined using crude odds ratios along with 95% confidence intervals. All analyses were done at 5% significance using Microsoft Excel 2016. Results: A total of n = 19 completed studies had n = 2567 screened and n = 2442 enrolled participants with a screen failure and dropout rate of 5% and 4%, respectively. We found 59% screen failures due to abnormal laboratory values. The main reasons for dropouts were lost to follow-up 86 (88%). High-risk and interventional studies were the predictors for both screen failures and dropouts, but pharmaceutical industry-funded studies and healthy participants were predictors for only screen failures. Conclusion: Risk, funding, study design, and nature of participants are important to be considered while planning studies to minimize screen failures and dropouts.
topic dropouts
healthy participants
high-risk studies
pharmaceutical industry-funded studies
screen failures
url http://www.picronline.org/article.asp?issn=2229-3485;year=2020;volume=11;issue=2;spage=81;epage=85;aulast=Bose
work_keys_str_mv AT debdiptabose factorsinfluencingrecruitmentandretentionofparticipantsinclinicalstudiesconductedatatertiaryreferralcenterafiveyearaudit
AT shrutisaha factorsinfluencingrecruitmentandretentionofparticipantsinclinicalstudiesconductedatatertiaryreferralcenterafiveyearaudit
AT unnatisaxena factorsinfluencingrecruitmentandretentionofparticipantsinclinicalstudiesconductedatatertiaryreferralcenterafiveyearaudit
AT harshadkesari factorsinfluencingrecruitmentandretentionofparticipantsinclinicalstudiesconductedatatertiaryreferralcenterafiveyearaudit
AT urmilamthatte factorsinfluencingrecruitmentandretentionofparticipantsinclinicalstudiesconductedatatertiaryreferralcenterafiveyearaudit
AT nithyajgogtay factorsinfluencingrecruitmentandretentionofparticipantsinclinicalstudiesconductedatatertiaryreferralcenterafiveyearaudit
_version_ 1724606294827991040