Use of the 14C Breath Test in the Treatment of Helicobacter pylori

Fifty-two patients with gastric disorders referred to the same physician over the course of one year were endoscoped, biopsied and given a 14C breath test to identify Helicobacter pylori. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the 14C breath test were found to be 83%, 89% and 87%, respectively, wh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: AJ Rae, A Belzberg, IGM Cleator, M Caglar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 1995-01-01
Series:Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1995/289703
id doaj-9776c9bbb86f4ef3a051b2082677f038
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9776c9bbb86f4ef3a051b2082677f0382020-11-24T23:30:06ZengHindawi LimitedCanadian Journal of Gastroenterology0835-79001995-01-019419119410.1155/1995/289703Use of the 14C Breath Test in the Treatment of Helicobacter pyloriAJ Rae0A Belzberg1IGM Cleator2M Caglar3Gastrointestinal Clinic, St Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, CanadaGastrointestinal Clinic, St Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, CanadaGastrointestinal Clinic, St Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, CanadaGastrointestinal Clinic, St Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, CanadaFifty-two patients with gastric disorders referred to the same physician over the course of one year were endoscoped, biopsied and given a 14C breath test to identify Helicobacter pylori. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the 14C breath test were found to be 83%, 89% and 87%, respectively, when taking biopsy results as the `gold standard'. These figures rose to 85%, 93% and 89%, respectively, when the first five cases were not included, representing a ‘learning curve’ associated with the development of cut-off levels for the breath test. In five cases, persons were biopsied and given a breath test at least one month later, making 10 comparisons possible. Biopsy and breath test corresponded in nine of 10 comparisons (90%). In two of four false negatives (14C breath test negative but biopsy positive) only scant numbers of helicobacter organisms were found. In one of three false positives (14C breath test positive but biopsy negative) acute inflammation of the duodenal biopsied material was detected. Also, double eradication therapy (omeprazole 20 mg bid and amoxicillin trihydrate 1000 mg bid), administered in all three false positive cases, was followed by 14C breath testing six weeks later, which indicated normal scores or absence of the organism.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1995/289703
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author AJ Rae
A Belzberg
IGM Cleator
M Caglar
spellingShingle AJ Rae
A Belzberg
IGM Cleator
M Caglar
Use of the 14C Breath Test in the Treatment of Helicobacter pylori
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology
author_facet AJ Rae
A Belzberg
IGM Cleator
M Caglar
author_sort AJ Rae
title Use of the 14C Breath Test in the Treatment of Helicobacter pylori
title_short Use of the 14C Breath Test in the Treatment of Helicobacter pylori
title_full Use of the 14C Breath Test in the Treatment of Helicobacter pylori
title_fullStr Use of the 14C Breath Test in the Treatment of Helicobacter pylori
title_full_unstemmed Use of the 14C Breath Test in the Treatment of Helicobacter pylori
title_sort use of the 14c breath test in the treatment of helicobacter pylori
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology
issn 0835-7900
publishDate 1995-01-01
description Fifty-two patients with gastric disorders referred to the same physician over the course of one year were endoscoped, biopsied and given a 14C breath test to identify Helicobacter pylori. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the 14C breath test were found to be 83%, 89% and 87%, respectively, when taking biopsy results as the `gold standard'. These figures rose to 85%, 93% and 89%, respectively, when the first five cases were not included, representing a ‘learning curve’ associated with the development of cut-off levels for the breath test. In five cases, persons were biopsied and given a breath test at least one month later, making 10 comparisons possible. Biopsy and breath test corresponded in nine of 10 comparisons (90%). In two of four false negatives (14C breath test negative but biopsy positive) only scant numbers of helicobacter organisms were found. In one of three false positives (14C breath test positive but biopsy negative) acute inflammation of the duodenal biopsied material was detected. Also, double eradication therapy (omeprazole 20 mg bid and amoxicillin trihydrate 1000 mg bid), administered in all three false positive cases, was followed by 14C breath testing six weeks later, which indicated normal scores or absence of the organism.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1995/289703
work_keys_str_mv AT ajrae useofthe14cbreathtestinthetreatmentofhelicobacterpylori
AT abelzberg useofthe14cbreathtestinthetreatmentofhelicobacterpylori
AT igmcleator useofthe14cbreathtestinthetreatmentofhelicobacterpylori
AT mcaglar useofthe14cbreathtestinthetreatmentofhelicobacterpylori
_version_ 1725542998015475712