EVALUATION OF CLINICAL USE HABİTS OF TUMOR MARKER TESTS

Tumor markers(TMs) result from the re-expression of substances by embryologically related tissues. Many are found in different tumors of the same tissue. Therefore, they have low specificity and aren’t sufficiently sensitive as a screening test. The aim of this study is to evaluate the TM requesting...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Soycan MIZRAK
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Rojan GÜMÜŞ 2020-08-01
Series:International Journal of Health Services Research and Policy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ijhsrp/issue/56530/692759
id doaj-9752768e87a148a7b18d5c46d05c60e7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9752768e87a148a7b18d5c46d05c60e72021-10-02T18:58:22ZengRojan GÜMÜŞInternational Journal of Health Services Research and Policy2602-34822020-08-0152137143https://doi.org/10.33457/ijhsrp.692759EVALUATION OF CLINICAL USE HABİTS OF TUMOR MARKER TESTSSoycan MIZRAK0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0287-9402Usak University Faculty of Medicine, Clinical Biochemistry, TURKEYTumor markers(TMs) result from the re-expression of substances by embryologically related tissues. Many are found in different tumors of the same tissue. Therefore, they have low specificity and aren’t sufficiently sensitive as a screening test. The aim of this study is to evaluate the TM requesting habits of clinicians in Usak Training and Research Hospital, and the appropriateness of the test requests with the diagnosis. Material-Method: Data of 6998 serum TMs requested from 3316 patients between May 1 and July 31, 2019 were obtained from Laboratory Information System and grouped as sex, age, disease diagnoses and multiple requests (more than 3 tests simultaneously). Compliance with diagnosis was evaluated as appropriate or inappropriate based on published guidelines for indications for TM requests. Results: 796 of the 6998 TMs requested from inpatients (2.75 markers/patient) and 6202 from outpatients (2.04 markers/patient). Most TMs were made in the 50-70 age range (48.3%). Multiple TMs were mostly demanded from the Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic with the diagnosis of menstrual irregularity. Also, 1078 of 1408 total PSA and 28 of 191 free PSA tests were requested with appropriate pre-diagnosis. Conclusion: This study is an example of the use of data mining for conformity assessment purposes of the TM requests. Accordingly, it was found that the TMs were often incompatible with the diagnosis and were used for general screening purposes. In order to minimize misuse, evidence based indicators should be developed and clinician awareness should be increased by creating test request algorithms that support the diagnosis.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ijhsrp/issue/56530/692759tumor markerapproptiatenesstest request
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Soycan MIZRAK
spellingShingle Soycan MIZRAK
EVALUATION OF CLINICAL USE HABİTS OF TUMOR MARKER TESTS
International Journal of Health Services Research and Policy
tumor marker
approptiateness
test request
author_facet Soycan MIZRAK
author_sort Soycan MIZRAK
title EVALUATION OF CLINICAL USE HABİTS OF TUMOR MARKER TESTS
title_short EVALUATION OF CLINICAL USE HABİTS OF TUMOR MARKER TESTS
title_full EVALUATION OF CLINICAL USE HABİTS OF TUMOR MARKER TESTS
title_fullStr EVALUATION OF CLINICAL USE HABİTS OF TUMOR MARKER TESTS
title_full_unstemmed EVALUATION OF CLINICAL USE HABİTS OF TUMOR MARKER TESTS
title_sort evaluation of clinical use habi̇ts of tumor marker tests
publisher Rojan GÜMÜŞ
series International Journal of Health Services Research and Policy
issn 2602-3482
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Tumor markers(TMs) result from the re-expression of substances by embryologically related tissues. Many are found in different tumors of the same tissue. Therefore, they have low specificity and aren’t sufficiently sensitive as a screening test. The aim of this study is to evaluate the TM requesting habits of clinicians in Usak Training and Research Hospital, and the appropriateness of the test requests with the diagnosis. Material-Method: Data of 6998 serum TMs requested from 3316 patients between May 1 and July 31, 2019 were obtained from Laboratory Information System and grouped as sex, age, disease diagnoses and multiple requests (more than 3 tests simultaneously). Compliance with diagnosis was evaluated as appropriate or inappropriate based on published guidelines for indications for TM requests. Results: 796 of the 6998 TMs requested from inpatients (2.75 markers/patient) and 6202 from outpatients (2.04 markers/patient). Most TMs were made in the 50-70 age range (48.3%). Multiple TMs were mostly demanded from the Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic with the diagnosis of menstrual irregularity. Also, 1078 of 1408 total PSA and 28 of 191 free PSA tests were requested with appropriate pre-diagnosis. Conclusion: This study is an example of the use of data mining for conformity assessment purposes of the TM requests. Accordingly, it was found that the TMs were often incompatible with the diagnosis and were used for general screening purposes. In order to minimize misuse, evidence based indicators should be developed and clinician awareness should be increased by creating test request algorithms that support the diagnosis.
topic tumor marker
approptiateness
test request
url https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ijhsrp/issue/56530/692759
work_keys_str_mv AT soycanmizrak evaluationofclinicalusehabitsoftumormarkertests
_version_ 1716848406254583808