360 virtual reality pediatric mass casualty incident: A cross sectional observational study of triage and out‐of‐hospital intervention accuracy at a national conference
Abstract Objective With adolescent mass casualty incidents (MCI) on the rise, out‐of‐hospital readiness is critical to optimize disaster response. We sought to test the feasibility and acceptability of a 360 Virtual Reality (360 VR) platform for disaster event decisionmaking. Methods This was a cros...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2020-10-01
|
Series: | Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12214 |
id |
doaj-9749032a5f1d49ba8269430771d70134 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9749032a5f1d49ba8269430771d701342020-11-25T04:06:07ZengWileyJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open2688-11522020-10-011597498010.1002/emp2.12214360 virtual reality pediatric mass casualty incident: A cross sectional observational study of triage and out‐of‐hospital intervention accuracy at a national conferenceJason Lowe0Cynthia Peng1Christopher Winstead‐Derlega2Henry Curtis3Stanford University Department of Emergency Medicine Palo Alto California USAStanford University Department of Emergency Medicine Palo Alto California USAStanford University Department of Emergency Medicine Palo Alto California USAStanford University Department of Emergency Medicine Palo Alto California USAAbstract Objective With adolescent mass casualty incidents (MCI) on the rise, out‐of‐hospital readiness is critical to optimize disaster response. We sought to test the feasibility and acceptability of a 360 Virtual Reality (360 VR) platform for disaster event decisionmaking. Methods This was a cross‐sectional observational assessment of a subject's ability to triage and perform out‐of‐hospital interventions using a 360 VR MCI module. A convenience sample of attendees was recruited over 1.5 days from the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) national conference in San Diego, CA. Results Two hundred and seven (207) subjects were enrolled. Ninety‐six (46%) subjects identified as attendings, 66 (32%) as residents, 13 (6%) as medical students, 4 (2%) as emergency medical technicians and 28 (14%) as other. When comparing mean scores between groups, physicians who were <40 years old had mean scores higher than physicians who were >40 years old (8.7 vs 6.5, P < 0.001). Residents achieved higher scores than attendings (8.6 vs 7.5, P = 0.005). Based on a 5‐point Likert scale, participants felt the 360 VR experience was engaging (median = 5) and enjoyable (median = 5). Most felt that 360 VR was more immersive than mannequin‐based simulation training (median = 5). Conclusion We conclude that 360 VR is a feasible platform for assessing triage and intervention decisionmaking for adolescent MCIs. It is well received by subjects and may have a role as a training and education tool for disaster readiness. In this era of distanced learning, 360 VR is an attractive option for future immersive educational experiences.https://doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12214360 virtual reality (VR)disaster preparednessmass casualty incident (MCI)pediatricout‐of‐hospitaltriage |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jason Lowe Cynthia Peng Christopher Winstead‐Derlega Henry Curtis |
spellingShingle |
Jason Lowe Cynthia Peng Christopher Winstead‐Derlega Henry Curtis 360 virtual reality pediatric mass casualty incident: A cross sectional observational study of triage and out‐of‐hospital intervention accuracy at a national conference Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open 360 virtual reality (VR) disaster preparedness mass casualty incident (MCI) pediatric out‐of‐hospital triage |
author_facet |
Jason Lowe Cynthia Peng Christopher Winstead‐Derlega Henry Curtis |
author_sort |
Jason Lowe |
title |
360 virtual reality pediatric mass casualty incident: A cross sectional observational study of triage and out‐of‐hospital intervention accuracy at a national conference |
title_short |
360 virtual reality pediatric mass casualty incident: A cross sectional observational study of triage and out‐of‐hospital intervention accuracy at a national conference |
title_full |
360 virtual reality pediatric mass casualty incident: A cross sectional observational study of triage and out‐of‐hospital intervention accuracy at a national conference |
title_fullStr |
360 virtual reality pediatric mass casualty incident: A cross sectional observational study of triage and out‐of‐hospital intervention accuracy at a national conference |
title_full_unstemmed |
360 virtual reality pediatric mass casualty incident: A cross sectional observational study of triage and out‐of‐hospital intervention accuracy at a national conference |
title_sort |
360 virtual reality pediatric mass casualty incident: a cross sectional observational study of triage and out‐of‐hospital intervention accuracy at a national conference |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open |
issn |
2688-1152 |
publishDate |
2020-10-01 |
description |
Abstract Objective With adolescent mass casualty incidents (MCI) on the rise, out‐of‐hospital readiness is critical to optimize disaster response. We sought to test the feasibility and acceptability of a 360 Virtual Reality (360 VR) platform for disaster event decisionmaking. Methods This was a cross‐sectional observational assessment of a subject's ability to triage and perform out‐of‐hospital interventions using a 360 VR MCI module. A convenience sample of attendees was recruited over 1.5 days from the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) national conference in San Diego, CA. Results Two hundred and seven (207) subjects were enrolled. Ninety‐six (46%) subjects identified as attendings, 66 (32%) as residents, 13 (6%) as medical students, 4 (2%) as emergency medical technicians and 28 (14%) as other. When comparing mean scores between groups, physicians who were <40 years old had mean scores higher than physicians who were >40 years old (8.7 vs 6.5, P < 0.001). Residents achieved higher scores than attendings (8.6 vs 7.5, P = 0.005). Based on a 5‐point Likert scale, participants felt the 360 VR experience was engaging (median = 5) and enjoyable (median = 5). Most felt that 360 VR was more immersive than mannequin‐based simulation training (median = 5). Conclusion We conclude that 360 VR is a feasible platform for assessing triage and intervention decisionmaking for adolescent MCIs. It is well received by subjects and may have a role as a training and education tool for disaster readiness. In this era of distanced learning, 360 VR is an attractive option for future immersive educational experiences. |
topic |
360 virtual reality (VR) disaster preparedness mass casualty incident (MCI) pediatric out‐of‐hospital triage |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12214 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jasonlowe 360virtualrealitypediatricmasscasualtyincidentacrosssectionalobservationalstudyoftriageandoutofhospitalinterventionaccuracyatanationalconference AT cynthiapeng 360virtualrealitypediatricmasscasualtyincidentacrosssectionalobservationalstudyoftriageandoutofhospitalinterventionaccuracyatanationalconference AT christopherwinsteadderlega 360virtualrealitypediatricmasscasualtyincidentacrosssectionalobservationalstudyoftriageandoutofhospitalinterventionaccuracyatanationalconference AT henrycurtis 360virtualrealitypediatricmasscasualtyincidentacrosssectionalobservationalstudyoftriageandoutofhospitalinterventionaccuracyatanationalconference |
_version_ |
1724432349170499584 |