360 virtual reality pediatric mass casualty incident: A cross sectional observational study of triage and out‐of‐hospital intervention accuracy at a national conference

Abstract Objective With adolescent mass casualty incidents (MCI) on the rise, out‐of‐hospital readiness is critical to optimize disaster response. We sought to test the feasibility and acceptability of a 360 Virtual Reality (360 VR) platform for disaster event decisionmaking. Methods This was a cros...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jason Lowe, Cynthia Peng, Christopher Winstead‐Derlega, Henry Curtis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-10-01
Series:Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12214
id doaj-9749032a5f1d49ba8269430771d70134
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9749032a5f1d49ba8269430771d701342020-11-25T04:06:07ZengWileyJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open2688-11522020-10-011597498010.1002/emp2.12214360 virtual reality pediatric mass casualty incident: A cross sectional observational study of triage and out‐of‐hospital intervention accuracy at a national conferenceJason Lowe0Cynthia Peng1Christopher Winstead‐Derlega2Henry Curtis3Stanford University Department of Emergency Medicine Palo Alto California USAStanford University Department of Emergency Medicine Palo Alto California USAStanford University Department of Emergency Medicine Palo Alto California USAStanford University Department of Emergency Medicine Palo Alto California USAAbstract Objective With adolescent mass casualty incidents (MCI) on the rise, out‐of‐hospital readiness is critical to optimize disaster response. We sought to test the feasibility and acceptability of a 360 Virtual Reality (360 VR) platform for disaster event decisionmaking. Methods This was a cross‐sectional observational assessment of a subject's ability to triage and perform out‐of‐hospital interventions using a 360 VR MCI module. A convenience sample of attendees was recruited over 1.5 days from the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) national conference in San Diego, CA. Results Two hundred and seven (207) subjects were enrolled. Ninety‐six (46%) subjects identified as attendings, 66 (32%) as residents, 13 (6%) as medical students, 4 (2%) as emergency medical technicians and 28 (14%) as other. When comparing mean scores between groups, physicians who were <40 years old had mean scores higher than physicians who were >40 years old (8.7 vs 6.5, P < 0.001). Residents achieved higher scores than attendings (8.6 vs 7.5, P = 0.005). Based on a 5‐point Likert scale, participants felt the 360 VR experience was engaging (median = 5) and enjoyable (median = 5). Most felt that 360 VR was more immersive than mannequin‐based simulation training (median = 5). Conclusion We conclude that 360 VR is a feasible platform for assessing triage and intervention decisionmaking for adolescent MCIs. It is well received by subjects and may have a role as a training and education tool for disaster readiness. In this era of distanced learning, 360 VR is an attractive option for future immersive educational experiences.https://doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12214360 virtual reality (VR)disaster preparednessmass casualty incident (MCI)pediatricout‐of‐hospitaltriage
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jason Lowe
Cynthia Peng
Christopher Winstead‐Derlega
Henry Curtis
spellingShingle Jason Lowe
Cynthia Peng
Christopher Winstead‐Derlega
Henry Curtis
360 virtual reality pediatric mass casualty incident: A cross sectional observational study of triage and out‐of‐hospital intervention accuracy at a national conference
Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open
360 virtual reality (VR)
disaster preparedness
mass casualty incident (MCI)
pediatric
out‐of‐hospital
triage
author_facet Jason Lowe
Cynthia Peng
Christopher Winstead‐Derlega
Henry Curtis
author_sort Jason Lowe
title 360 virtual reality pediatric mass casualty incident: A cross sectional observational study of triage and out‐of‐hospital intervention accuracy at a national conference
title_short 360 virtual reality pediatric mass casualty incident: A cross sectional observational study of triage and out‐of‐hospital intervention accuracy at a national conference
title_full 360 virtual reality pediatric mass casualty incident: A cross sectional observational study of triage and out‐of‐hospital intervention accuracy at a national conference
title_fullStr 360 virtual reality pediatric mass casualty incident: A cross sectional observational study of triage and out‐of‐hospital intervention accuracy at a national conference
title_full_unstemmed 360 virtual reality pediatric mass casualty incident: A cross sectional observational study of triage and out‐of‐hospital intervention accuracy at a national conference
title_sort 360 virtual reality pediatric mass casualty incident: a cross sectional observational study of triage and out‐of‐hospital intervention accuracy at a national conference
publisher Wiley
series Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open
issn 2688-1152
publishDate 2020-10-01
description Abstract Objective With adolescent mass casualty incidents (MCI) on the rise, out‐of‐hospital readiness is critical to optimize disaster response. We sought to test the feasibility and acceptability of a 360 Virtual Reality (360 VR) platform for disaster event decisionmaking. Methods This was a cross‐sectional observational assessment of a subject's ability to triage and perform out‐of‐hospital interventions using a 360 VR MCI module. A convenience sample of attendees was recruited over 1.5 days from the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) national conference in San Diego, CA. Results Two hundred and seven (207) subjects were enrolled. Ninety‐six (46%) subjects identified as attendings, 66 (32%) as residents, 13 (6%) as medical students, 4 (2%) as emergency medical technicians and 28 (14%) as other. When comparing mean scores between groups, physicians who were <40 years old had mean scores higher than physicians who were >40 years old (8.7 vs 6.5, P < 0.001). Residents achieved higher scores than attendings (8.6 vs 7.5, P = 0.005). Based on a 5‐point Likert scale, participants felt the 360 VR experience was engaging (median = 5) and enjoyable (median = 5). Most felt that 360 VR was more immersive than mannequin‐based simulation training (median = 5). Conclusion We conclude that 360 VR is a feasible platform for assessing triage and intervention decisionmaking for adolescent MCIs. It is well received by subjects and may have a role as a training and education tool for disaster readiness. In this era of distanced learning, 360 VR is an attractive option for future immersive educational experiences.
topic 360 virtual reality (VR)
disaster preparedness
mass casualty incident (MCI)
pediatric
out‐of‐hospital
triage
url https://doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12214
work_keys_str_mv AT jasonlowe 360virtualrealitypediatricmasscasualtyincidentacrosssectionalobservationalstudyoftriageandoutofhospitalinterventionaccuracyatanationalconference
AT cynthiapeng 360virtualrealitypediatricmasscasualtyincidentacrosssectionalobservationalstudyoftriageandoutofhospitalinterventionaccuracyatanationalconference
AT christopherwinsteadderlega 360virtualrealitypediatricmasscasualtyincidentacrosssectionalobservationalstudyoftriageandoutofhospitalinterventionaccuracyatanationalconference
AT henrycurtis 360virtualrealitypediatricmasscasualtyincidentacrosssectionalobservationalstudyoftriageandoutofhospitalinterventionaccuracyatanationalconference
_version_ 1724432349170499584