Comparative Analyses of with Functional Predictions

Background Cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding proteins (Cpebs) are a family of proteins that bind to defined groups of mRNAs and regulate their translation. While Cpebs were originally identified as important features of oocyte maturation, recent interest is due to their prospective roles i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiang-Ping Wang, Nigel G.F. Cooper
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2010-01-01
Series:Bioinformatics and Biology Insights
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.4137/BBI.S5087
id doaj-9736d8bb349c4cf2b9c1d4c9aa6df2f4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9736d8bb349c4cf2b9c1d4c9aa6df2f42020-11-25T03:13:23ZengSAGE PublishingBioinformatics and Biology Insights1177-93222010-01-01410.4137/BBI.S5087Comparative Analyses of with Functional PredictionsXiang-Ping Wang0Nigel G.F. Cooper1Anatomical Sciences and Neurobiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA.Anatomical Sciences and Neurobiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA.Background Cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding proteins (Cpebs) are a family of proteins that bind to defined groups of mRNAs and regulate their translation. While Cpebs were originally identified as important features of oocyte maturation, recent interest is due to their prospective roles in neural system plasticity. Results In this study we made use of bioinformatic tools and methods including NCBI Blast, UCSC Blat, and Invitrogen Vector NTI to comprehensively analyze all known isoforms of four mouse Cpeb paralogs extracted from the national UniGene, UniProt, and NCBI protein databases. We identified multiple alternative splicing variants for each Cpeb. Regions of commonality and distinctiveness were evident when comparing Cpeb2, 3 , and 4. In addition, we performed cross-ortholog comparisons among multiple species. The exon patterns were generally conserved across vertebrates. Mouse and human isoforms were compared in greater detail as they are the most represented in the current databases. The homologous and distinct regions are strictly conserved in mouse Cpeb and human CPEB proteins. Novel variants were proposed based on cross-ortholog comparisons and validated using biological methods. The functions of the alternatively spliced regions were predicted using the Eukaryotic Linear Motif resource. Conclusions Together, the large number of transcripts and proteins indicate the presence of a hitherto unappreciated complexity in the regulation and functions of Cpebs. The evolutionary retention of variable regions as described here is most likely an indication of their functional significance.https://doi.org/10.4137/BBI.S5087
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xiang-Ping Wang
Nigel G.F. Cooper
spellingShingle Xiang-Ping Wang
Nigel G.F. Cooper
Comparative Analyses of with Functional Predictions
Bioinformatics and Biology Insights
author_facet Xiang-Ping Wang
Nigel G.F. Cooper
author_sort Xiang-Ping Wang
title Comparative Analyses of with Functional Predictions
title_short Comparative Analyses of with Functional Predictions
title_full Comparative Analyses of with Functional Predictions
title_fullStr Comparative Analyses of with Functional Predictions
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analyses of with Functional Predictions
title_sort comparative analyses of with functional predictions
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Bioinformatics and Biology Insights
issn 1177-9322
publishDate 2010-01-01
description Background Cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding proteins (Cpebs) are a family of proteins that bind to defined groups of mRNAs and regulate their translation. While Cpebs were originally identified as important features of oocyte maturation, recent interest is due to their prospective roles in neural system plasticity. Results In this study we made use of bioinformatic tools and methods including NCBI Blast, UCSC Blat, and Invitrogen Vector NTI to comprehensively analyze all known isoforms of four mouse Cpeb paralogs extracted from the national UniGene, UniProt, and NCBI protein databases. We identified multiple alternative splicing variants for each Cpeb. Regions of commonality and distinctiveness were evident when comparing Cpeb2, 3 , and 4. In addition, we performed cross-ortholog comparisons among multiple species. The exon patterns were generally conserved across vertebrates. Mouse and human isoforms were compared in greater detail as they are the most represented in the current databases. The homologous and distinct regions are strictly conserved in mouse Cpeb and human CPEB proteins. Novel variants were proposed based on cross-ortholog comparisons and validated using biological methods. The functions of the alternatively spliced regions were predicted using the Eukaryotic Linear Motif resource. Conclusions Together, the large number of transcripts and proteins indicate the presence of a hitherto unappreciated complexity in the regulation and functions of Cpebs. The evolutionary retention of variable regions as described here is most likely an indication of their functional significance.
url https://doi.org/10.4137/BBI.S5087
work_keys_str_mv AT xiangpingwang comparativeanalysesofwithfunctionalpredictions
AT nigelgfcooper comparativeanalysesofwithfunctionalpredictions
_version_ 1724647169694105600