"Brushwork thick and easy" or a "beauty-parlor mask for murder"? Reckoning with the Great German Art Exhibitions in the Western Democracies

This analysis of the reception of the Great German Art Exhibitions in presses in the Western democracies identifies limits, oversights, and key assumptions in these texts. Over time these assumptions accrued the force of myths. Key myths exposed are that Nazi art was: bad art, all the same, propagan...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Holz, Keith
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: International Association of Research Institutes in the History of Art (RIHA) 2012-09-01
Series:RIHA Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.riha-journal.org/articles/2012/2012-jul-sep/holz-reckoning
id doaj-971e0402eba5466d900df6915be99248
record_format Article
spelling doaj-971e0402eba5466d900df6915be992482020-11-24T23:07:59ZdeuInternational Association of Research Institutes in the History of Art (RIHA)RIHA Journal 2190-33282190-33282012-09-010055"Brushwork thick and easy" or a "beauty-parlor mask for murder"? Reckoning with the Great German Art Exhibitions in the Western DemocraciesHolz, KeithThis analysis of the reception of the Great German Art Exhibitions in presses in the Western democracies identifies limits, oversights, and key assumptions in these texts. Over time these assumptions accrued the force of myths. Key myths exposed are that Nazi art was: bad art, all the same, propaganda, not art at all, and modernist art's opposite. Concern was also registered that Western audiences might like it. Until war's end, discourse hewed close to frameworks and terms set forth by National Socialist propaganda, whereas postwar discourse was often subsumed within the reeducation programs of Occupation forces. In both phases, frank analysis of the art in exhibition was deferred. Recognition of myths from this early phase of Nazi art's historiography aims to discourage their repetition in scholarship on Nazi art and these exhibitions. http://www.riha-journal.org/articles/2012/2012-jul-sep/holz-reckoningExhibitionshistoriographyNazi artGerman artreceptioncriticismanti-modernismmodernism
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Holz, Keith
spellingShingle Holz, Keith
"Brushwork thick and easy" or a "beauty-parlor mask for murder"? Reckoning with the Great German Art Exhibitions in the Western Democracies
RIHA Journal
Exhibitions
historiography
Nazi art
German art
reception
criticism
anti-modernism
modernism
author_facet Holz, Keith
author_sort Holz, Keith
title "Brushwork thick and easy" or a "beauty-parlor mask for murder"? Reckoning with the Great German Art Exhibitions in the Western Democracies
title_short "Brushwork thick and easy" or a "beauty-parlor mask for murder"? Reckoning with the Great German Art Exhibitions in the Western Democracies
title_full "Brushwork thick and easy" or a "beauty-parlor mask for murder"? Reckoning with the Great German Art Exhibitions in the Western Democracies
title_fullStr "Brushwork thick and easy" or a "beauty-parlor mask for murder"? Reckoning with the Great German Art Exhibitions in the Western Democracies
title_full_unstemmed "Brushwork thick and easy" or a "beauty-parlor mask for murder"? Reckoning with the Great German Art Exhibitions in the Western Democracies
title_sort "brushwork thick and easy" or a "beauty-parlor mask for murder"? reckoning with the great german art exhibitions in the western democracies
publisher International Association of Research Institutes in the History of Art (RIHA)
series RIHA Journal
issn 2190-3328
2190-3328
publishDate 2012-09-01
description This analysis of the reception of the Great German Art Exhibitions in presses in the Western democracies identifies limits, oversights, and key assumptions in these texts. Over time these assumptions accrued the force of myths. Key myths exposed are that Nazi art was: bad art, all the same, propaganda, not art at all, and modernist art's opposite. Concern was also registered that Western audiences might like it. Until war's end, discourse hewed close to frameworks and terms set forth by National Socialist propaganda, whereas postwar discourse was often subsumed within the reeducation programs of Occupation forces. In both phases, frank analysis of the art in exhibition was deferred. Recognition of myths from this early phase of Nazi art's historiography aims to discourage their repetition in scholarship on Nazi art and these exhibitions.
topic Exhibitions
historiography
Nazi art
German art
reception
criticism
anti-modernism
modernism
url http://www.riha-journal.org/articles/2012/2012-jul-sep/holz-reckoning
work_keys_str_mv AT holzkeith brushworkthickandeasyorabeautyparlormaskformurderreckoningwiththegreatgermanartexhibitionsinthewesterndemocracies
_version_ 1725616053761867776