Hydropolitical Complexes and Asymmetrical Power: Conflict, Cooperation, and Governance of International River Systems

Hydropolitical complexes are emerging to negotiate water-sharing policies that promote politicalstability, regional security, economic prosperity, and environmental sustainability. Yet interstatedisputes are occurring within most hydropolitical complexes, and weak riparians are oftencoerced to agree...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jenny R. Kehl
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University Library System, University of Pittsburgh 2015-08-01
Series:Journal of World-Systems Research
Online Access:http://jwsr.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/jwsr/article/view/429
id doaj-9718b45137b84519aef975b065346c58
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9718b45137b84519aef975b065346c582020-11-24T22:51:32ZengUniversity Library System, University of PittsburghJournal of World-Systems Research1076-156X2015-08-0117121823510.5195/jwsr.2011.429423Hydropolitical Complexes and Asymmetrical Power: Conflict, Cooperation, and Governance of International River SystemsJenny R. Kehl0Rutgers UniversityHydropolitical complexes are emerging to negotiate water-sharing policies that promote politicalstability, regional security, economic prosperity, and environmental sustainability. Yet interstatedisputes are occurring within most hydropolitical complexes, and weak riparians are oftencoerced to agree to water-sharing policies that adversely affect them. This research examines thestrategies weak riparians use to assert leverage in international river basins with asymmetricalpower, and the success of those strategies in achieving cooperation versus conflict. Grounded inthe theoretical framework of hydro hegemony, hard power, and soft power, this study uses crossnational analysis to test the effects of geographic, military, political, economic, technological,and external influence on water governance in eight international river systems. The resultsdemonstrate that weak riparians mobilize the assets and capacities of external actors, such asdonor countries and the World Bank, to increase their leverage within hydropolitical complexes.The study finds that strategies to balance hard power are largely ineffective; they fail to achievecooperative water-sharing arrangements and often exacerbate conflict. In contrast, strategies tobalance economic power and soft power, such as market access and political legitimacy, aremore successful in promoting cooperation and preventing conflict in hydropolitical complexes.http://jwsr.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/jwsr/article/view/429
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jenny R. Kehl
spellingShingle Jenny R. Kehl
Hydropolitical Complexes and Asymmetrical Power: Conflict, Cooperation, and Governance of International River Systems
Journal of World-Systems Research
author_facet Jenny R. Kehl
author_sort Jenny R. Kehl
title Hydropolitical Complexes and Asymmetrical Power: Conflict, Cooperation, and Governance of International River Systems
title_short Hydropolitical Complexes and Asymmetrical Power: Conflict, Cooperation, and Governance of International River Systems
title_full Hydropolitical Complexes and Asymmetrical Power: Conflict, Cooperation, and Governance of International River Systems
title_fullStr Hydropolitical Complexes and Asymmetrical Power: Conflict, Cooperation, and Governance of International River Systems
title_full_unstemmed Hydropolitical Complexes and Asymmetrical Power: Conflict, Cooperation, and Governance of International River Systems
title_sort hydropolitical complexes and asymmetrical power: conflict, cooperation, and governance of international river systems
publisher University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
series Journal of World-Systems Research
issn 1076-156X
publishDate 2015-08-01
description Hydropolitical complexes are emerging to negotiate water-sharing policies that promote politicalstability, regional security, economic prosperity, and environmental sustainability. Yet interstatedisputes are occurring within most hydropolitical complexes, and weak riparians are oftencoerced to agree to water-sharing policies that adversely affect them. This research examines thestrategies weak riparians use to assert leverage in international river basins with asymmetricalpower, and the success of those strategies in achieving cooperation versus conflict. Grounded inthe theoretical framework of hydro hegemony, hard power, and soft power, this study uses crossnational analysis to test the effects of geographic, military, political, economic, technological,and external influence on water governance in eight international river systems. The resultsdemonstrate that weak riparians mobilize the assets and capacities of external actors, such asdonor countries and the World Bank, to increase their leverage within hydropolitical complexes.The study finds that strategies to balance hard power are largely ineffective; they fail to achievecooperative water-sharing arrangements and often exacerbate conflict. In contrast, strategies tobalance economic power and soft power, such as market access and political legitimacy, aremore successful in promoting cooperation and preventing conflict in hydropolitical complexes.
url http://jwsr.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/jwsr/article/view/429
work_keys_str_mv AT jennyrkehl hydropoliticalcomplexesandasymmetricalpowerconflictcooperationandgovernanceofinternationalriversystems
_version_ 1725669231121399808