Mini Open Foraminotomy for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Comparison of Large Tubular and TrimLine Retractors
Study DesignRetrospective chart review.PurposeA comparison of mini open foraminotomy (MOF) for cervical radiculopathy using either large tubular (LT) or TrimLine (TL) retractors.Overview of LiteraturePosterior foraminotomy relieves compression of the cervical nerve root in radiculopathy patients. Ho...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Korean Spine Society
2015-08-01
|
Series: | Asian Spine Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-9-548.pdf |
id |
doaj-9717493e02d04360b6cc051e7ad81021 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9717493e02d04360b6cc051e7ad810212020-11-25T01:39:10ZengKorean Spine SocietyAsian Spine Journal1976-19021976-78462015-08-019454855210.4184/asj.2015.9.4.548802Mini Open Foraminotomy for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Comparison of Large Tubular and TrimLine RetractorsMasashi Uehara0Jun Takahashi1Shugo Kuraishi2Masayuki Shimizu3Shota Ikegami4Toshimasa Futatsugi5Kaoru Aoki6Keijiro Mukaiyama7Nobuhide Ogihara8Hiroyuki Hashidate9Hiroki Hirabayashi10Hiroyuki Kato11Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ina Central Hospital, Ina, Japan.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinonoi General Hospital, Nagano, Japan.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Marunouchi Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.Study DesignRetrospective chart review.PurposeA comparison of mini open foraminotomy (MOF) for cervical radiculopathy using either large tubular (LT) or TrimLine (TL) retractors.Overview of LiteraturePosterior foraminotomy relieves compression of the cervical nerve root in radiculopathy patients. However, invasion of the paravertebral muscle may cause major problems in these patients. To address these problems, we performed MOF.MethodsTwenty cervical radiculopathy patients (16 male and 4 female) who underwent MOF between May 2004 and August 2011 were assigned to LT and TL groups. Each group contained 10 subjects. Surgical and clinical outcomes were compared.ResultsThe average operating time in the TL group was significantly shorter than that in the LT group. The final follow-up mean neck disability indices significantly improved compared to the preoperative values (LT group, 12.0±7.8 vs. 28.0±9.4; TL group, 6.0±5.9 vs. 21.9±10). The final follow-up neck pain visual analog scale (VAS) scores also decreased significantly from the preoperative of 8.0±1.5 and 2.5±2.5 to the final follow-up values of 2.2±2.2 and 1.0±2.5 in the LT and TL groups, respectively. The recovery rate for the neck pain VAS score was 70.0±31.9 in the LT group and 87.0±32.0 in the TL group, thus suggesting no significant difference between the two groups.ConclusionsMOF with the TL retractor is an easy and safe procedure. Furthermore, the use of the TL retractor allows for a minimally invasive and effective surgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy patients.http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-9-548.pdfCervical radiculopathyPostoperative neck painParavertebral muscleMini open framinotomyLess invasive |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Masashi Uehara Jun Takahashi Shugo Kuraishi Masayuki Shimizu Shota Ikegami Toshimasa Futatsugi Kaoru Aoki Keijiro Mukaiyama Nobuhide Ogihara Hiroyuki Hashidate Hiroki Hirabayashi Hiroyuki Kato |
spellingShingle |
Masashi Uehara Jun Takahashi Shugo Kuraishi Masayuki Shimizu Shota Ikegami Toshimasa Futatsugi Kaoru Aoki Keijiro Mukaiyama Nobuhide Ogihara Hiroyuki Hashidate Hiroki Hirabayashi Hiroyuki Kato Mini Open Foraminotomy for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Comparison of Large Tubular and TrimLine Retractors Asian Spine Journal Cervical radiculopathy Postoperative neck pain Paravertebral muscle Mini open framinotomy Less invasive |
author_facet |
Masashi Uehara Jun Takahashi Shugo Kuraishi Masayuki Shimizu Shota Ikegami Toshimasa Futatsugi Kaoru Aoki Keijiro Mukaiyama Nobuhide Ogihara Hiroyuki Hashidate Hiroki Hirabayashi Hiroyuki Kato |
author_sort |
Masashi Uehara |
title |
Mini Open Foraminotomy for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Comparison of Large Tubular and TrimLine Retractors |
title_short |
Mini Open Foraminotomy for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Comparison of Large Tubular and TrimLine Retractors |
title_full |
Mini Open Foraminotomy for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Comparison of Large Tubular and TrimLine Retractors |
title_fullStr |
Mini Open Foraminotomy for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Comparison of Large Tubular and TrimLine Retractors |
title_full_unstemmed |
Mini Open Foraminotomy for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Comparison of Large Tubular and TrimLine Retractors |
title_sort |
mini open foraminotomy for cervical radiculopathy: a comparison of large tubular and trimline retractors |
publisher |
Korean Spine Society |
series |
Asian Spine Journal |
issn |
1976-1902 1976-7846 |
publishDate |
2015-08-01 |
description |
Study DesignRetrospective chart review.PurposeA comparison of mini open foraminotomy (MOF) for cervical radiculopathy using either large tubular (LT) or TrimLine (TL) retractors.Overview of LiteraturePosterior foraminotomy relieves compression of the cervical nerve root in radiculopathy patients. However, invasion of the paravertebral muscle may cause major problems in these patients. To address these problems, we performed MOF.MethodsTwenty cervical radiculopathy patients (16 male and 4 female) who underwent MOF between May 2004 and August 2011 were assigned to LT and TL groups. Each group contained 10 subjects. Surgical and clinical outcomes were compared.ResultsThe average operating time in the TL group was significantly shorter than that in the LT group. The final follow-up mean neck disability indices significantly improved compared to the preoperative values (LT group, 12.0±7.8 vs. 28.0±9.4; TL group, 6.0±5.9 vs. 21.9±10). The final follow-up neck pain visual analog scale (VAS) scores also decreased significantly from the preoperative of 8.0±1.5 and 2.5±2.5 to the final follow-up values of 2.2±2.2 and 1.0±2.5 in the LT and TL groups, respectively. The recovery rate for the neck pain VAS score was 70.0±31.9 in the LT group and 87.0±32.0 in the TL group, thus suggesting no significant difference between the two groups.ConclusionsMOF with the TL retractor is an easy and safe procedure. Furthermore, the use of the TL retractor allows for a minimally invasive and effective surgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy patients. |
topic |
Cervical radiculopathy Postoperative neck pain Paravertebral muscle Mini open framinotomy Less invasive |
url |
http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-9-548.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT masashiuehara miniopenforaminotomyforcervicalradiculopathyacomparisonoflargetubularandtrimlineretractors AT juntakahashi miniopenforaminotomyforcervicalradiculopathyacomparisonoflargetubularandtrimlineretractors AT shugokuraishi miniopenforaminotomyforcervicalradiculopathyacomparisonoflargetubularandtrimlineretractors AT masayukishimizu miniopenforaminotomyforcervicalradiculopathyacomparisonoflargetubularandtrimlineretractors AT shotaikegami miniopenforaminotomyforcervicalradiculopathyacomparisonoflargetubularandtrimlineretractors AT toshimasafutatsugi miniopenforaminotomyforcervicalradiculopathyacomparisonoflargetubularandtrimlineretractors AT kaoruaoki miniopenforaminotomyforcervicalradiculopathyacomparisonoflargetubularandtrimlineretractors AT keijiromukaiyama miniopenforaminotomyforcervicalradiculopathyacomparisonoflargetubularandtrimlineretractors AT nobuhideogihara miniopenforaminotomyforcervicalradiculopathyacomparisonoflargetubularandtrimlineretractors AT hiroyukihashidate miniopenforaminotomyforcervicalradiculopathyacomparisonoflargetubularandtrimlineretractors AT hirokihirabayashi miniopenforaminotomyforcervicalradiculopathyacomparisonoflargetubularandtrimlineretractors AT hiroyukikato miniopenforaminotomyforcervicalradiculopathyacomparisonoflargetubularandtrimlineretractors |
_version_ |
1725050153764651008 |