Mini Open Foraminotomy for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Comparison of Large Tubular and TrimLine Retractors

Study DesignRetrospective chart review.PurposeA comparison of mini open foraminotomy (MOF) for cervical radiculopathy using either large tubular (LT) or TrimLine (TL) retractors.Overview of LiteraturePosterior foraminotomy relieves compression of the cervical nerve root in radiculopathy patients. Ho...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Masashi Uehara, Jun Takahashi, Shugo Kuraishi, Masayuki Shimizu, Shota Ikegami, Toshimasa Futatsugi, Kaoru Aoki, Keijiro Mukaiyama, Nobuhide Ogihara, Hiroyuki Hashidate, Hiroki Hirabayashi, Hiroyuki Kato
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Spine Society 2015-08-01
Series:Asian Spine Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-9-548.pdf
id doaj-9717493e02d04360b6cc051e7ad81021
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9717493e02d04360b6cc051e7ad810212020-11-25T01:39:10ZengKorean Spine SocietyAsian Spine Journal1976-19021976-78462015-08-019454855210.4184/asj.2015.9.4.548802Mini Open Foraminotomy for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Comparison of Large Tubular and TrimLine RetractorsMasashi Uehara0Jun Takahashi1Shugo Kuraishi2Masayuki Shimizu3Shota Ikegami4Toshimasa Futatsugi5Kaoru Aoki6Keijiro Mukaiyama7Nobuhide Ogihara8Hiroyuki Hashidate9Hiroki Hirabayashi10Hiroyuki Kato11Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ina Central Hospital, Ina, Japan.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinonoi General Hospital, Nagano, Japan.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Marunouchi Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.Study DesignRetrospective chart review.PurposeA comparison of mini open foraminotomy (MOF) for cervical radiculopathy using either large tubular (LT) or TrimLine (TL) retractors.Overview of LiteraturePosterior foraminotomy relieves compression of the cervical nerve root in radiculopathy patients. However, invasion of the paravertebral muscle may cause major problems in these patients. To address these problems, we performed MOF.MethodsTwenty cervical radiculopathy patients (16 male and 4 female) who underwent MOF between May 2004 and August 2011 were assigned to LT and TL groups. Each group contained 10 subjects. Surgical and clinical outcomes were compared.ResultsThe average operating time in the TL group was significantly shorter than that in the LT group. The final follow-up mean neck disability indices significantly improved compared to the preoperative values (LT group, 12.0±7.8 vs. 28.0±9.4; TL group, 6.0±5.9 vs. 21.9±10). The final follow-up neck pain visual analog scale (VAS) scores also decreased significantly from the preoperative of 8.0±1.5 and 2.5±2.5 to the final follow-up values of 2.2±2.2 and 1.0±2.5 in the LT and TL groups, respectively. The recovery rate for the neck pain VAS score was 70.0±31.9 in the LT group and 87.0±32.0 in the TL group, thus suggesting no significant difference between the two groups.ConclusionsMOF with the TL retractor is an easy and safe procedure. Furthermore, the use of the TL retractor allows for a minimally invasive and effective surgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy patients.http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-9-548.pdfCervical radiculopathyPostoperative neck painParavertebral muscleMini open framinotomyLess invasive
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Masashi Uehara
Jun Takahashi
Shugo Kuraishi
Masayuki Shimizu
Shota Ikegami
Toshimasa Futatsugi
Kaoru Aoki
Keijiro Mukaiyama
Nobuhide Ogihara
Hiroyuki Hashidate
Hiroki Hirabayashi
Hiroyuki Kato
spellingShingle Masashi Uehara
Jun Takahashi
Shugo Kuraishi
Masayuki Shimizu
Shota Ikegami
Toshimasa Futatsugi
Kaoru Aoki
Keijiro Mukaiyama
Nobuhide Ogihara
Hiroyuki Hashidate
Hiroki Hirabayashi
Hiroyuki Kato
Mini Open Foraminotomy for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Comparison of Large Tubular and TrimLine Retractors
Asian Spine Journal
Cervical radiculopathy
Postoperative neck pain
Paravertebral muscle
Mini open framinotomy
Less invasive
author_facet Masashi Uehara
Jun Takahashi
Shugo Kuraishi
Masayuki Shimizu
Shota Ikegami
Toshimasa Futatsugi
Kaoru Aoki
Keijiro Mukaiyama
Nobuhide Ogihara
Hiroyuki Hashidate
Hiroki Hirabayashi
Hiroyuki Kato
author_sort Masashi Uehara
title Mini Open Foraminotomy for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Comparison of Large Tubular and TrimLine Retractors
title_short Mini Open Foraminotomy for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Comparison of Large Tubular and TrimLine Retractors
title_full Mini Open Foraminotomy for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Comparison of Large Tubular and TrimLine Retractors
title_fullStr Mini Open Foraminotomy for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Comparison of Large Tubular and TrimLine Retractors
title_full_unstemmed Mini Open Foraminotomy for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Comparison of Large Tubular and TrimLine Retractors
title_sort mini open foraminotomy for cervical radiculopathy: a comparison of large tubular and trimline retractors
publisher Korean Spine Society
series Asian Spine Journal
issn 1976-1902
1976-7846
publishDate 2015-08-01
description Study DesignRetrospective chart review.PurposeA comparison of mini open foraminotomy (MOF) for cervical radiculopathy using either large tubular (LT) or TrimLine (TL) retractors.Overview of LiteraturePosterior foraminotomy relieves compression of the cervical nerve root in radiculopathy patients. However, invasion of the paravertebral muscle may cause major problems in these patients. To address these problems, we performed MOF.MethodsTwenty cervical radiculopathy patients (16 male and 4 female) who underwent MOF between May 2004 and August 2011 were assigned to LT and TL groups. Each group contained 10 subjects. Surgical and clinical outcomes were compared.ResultsThe average operating time in the TL group was significantly shorter than that in the LT group. The final follow-up mean neck disability indices significantly improved compared to the preoperative values (LT group, 12.0±7.8 vs. 28.0±9.4; TL group, 6.0±5.9 vs. 21.9±10). The final follow-up neck pain visual analog scale (VAS) scores also decreased significantly from the preoperative of 8.0±1.5 and 2.5±2.5 to the final follow-up values of 2.2±2.2 and 1.0±2.5 in the LT and TL groups, respectively. The recovery rate for the neck pain VAS score was 70.0±31.9 in the LT group and 87.0±32.0 in the TL group, thus suggesting no significant difference between the two groups.ConclusionsMOF with the TL retractor is an easy and safe procedure. Furthermore, the use of the TL retractor allows for a minimally invasive and effective surgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy patients.
topic Cervical radiculopathy
Postoperative neck pain
Paravertebral muscle
Mini open framinotomy
Less invasive
url http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-9-548.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT masashiuehara miniopenforaminotomyforcervicalradiculopathyacomparisonoflargetubularandtrimlineretractors
AT juntakahashi miniopenforaminotomyforcervicalradiculopathyacomparisonoflargetubularandtrimlineretractors
AT shugokuraishi miniopenforaminotomyforcervicalradiculopathyacomparisonoflargetubularandtrimlineretractors
AT masayukishimizu miniopenforaminotomyforcervicalradiculopathyacomparisonoflargetubularandtrimlineretractors
AT shotaikegami miniopenforaminotomyforcervicalradiculopathyacomparisonoflargetubularandtrimlineretractors
AT toshimasafutatsugi miniopenforaminotomyforcervicalradiculopathyacomparisonoflargetubularandtrimlineretractors
AT kaoruaoki miniopenforaminotomyforcervicalradiculopathyacomparisonoflargetubularandtrimlineretractors
AT keijiromukaiyama miniopenforaminotomyforcervicalradiculopathyacomparisonoflargetubularandtrimlineretractors
AT nobuhideogihara miniopenforaminotomyforcervicalradiculopathyacomparisonoflargetubularandtrimlineretractors
AT hiroyukihashidate miniopenforaminotomyforcervicalradiculopathyacomparisonoflargetubularandtrimlineretractors
AT hirokihirabayashi miniopenforaminotomyforcervicalradiculopathyacomparisonoflargetubularandtrimlineretractors
AT hiroyukikato miniopenforaminotomyforcervicalradiculopathyacomparisonoflargetubularandtrimlineretractors
_version_ 1725050153764651008