Comparison of CSES ionospheric RO data with COSMIC measurements

• Main Authors: X. Wang, W. Cheng, Z. Zhou, S. Xu, D. Yang, J. Cui
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Copernicus Publications 2019-11-01
• Series: Annales Geophysicae
• Online Access: https://www.ann-geophys.net/37/1025/2019/angeo-37-1025-2019.pdf

<p>CSES (China Seismo-Electromagnetic Satellite) is a newly launched electric-magnetic satellite in China. A GNSS occultation receiver (GOR) is installed on the satellite to retrieve electron density related parameters. In order to validate the radio occultation (RO) data from the GOR on board CSES, a comparison between CSES RO and the co-located COSMIC RO data is conducted to check the consistency and reliability of the CSES RO data using measurements from 12 February 2018 to 31 March 2019. CSES RO peak values (<i>Nm</i>F2), peak heights (<i>hm</i>F2), and electron density profiles (EPDs) are compared with corresponding COSMIC measurements in this study. The results show that (1) <i>Nm</i>F2 between CSES and COSMIC is in extremely good agreement, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9898. The near-zero bias between the two sets is <span class="inline-formula">0.005363×10⁵</span>&thinsp;cm<span class="inline-formula">⁻³</span> with a RMSE of <span class="inline-formula">0.3638×10⁵</span>&thinsp;cm<span class="inline-formula">⁻³</span>, and the relative bias is 1.97&thinsp;% with a relative RMSE of 16.17&thinsp;%, which are in accordance with previous studies according to error propagation rules. (2) <i>hm</i>F2 between the two missions is also in very good agreement with a correlation coefficient of 0.9385; the mean difference between the two sets is 0.59&thinsp;km with a RMSE of 12.28&thinsp;km, which is within the error limits of previous studies. (3) Co-located EDPs between the two sets are generally in good agreement, but with a better agreement for data above 200&thinsp;km than those below this altitude. Data at the peak height ranges show the best agreement, and then data above the peak regions; data below the peak regions, especially at the altitude of about the E layer, show relatively large fluctuations. It is concluded that CSES RO data are in good agreement with COSMIC measurements, and the CSES RO data are applicable for most ionosphere-related studies considering the wide acceptance and application of COSMIC RO measurements. However, particular attention should be paid to EDP data below peak regions in application as data at the bottom side of the profiles are less reliable than that at the peak and topside regions.</p>