EVALUATION OF PROGNOSIS IN MULTIFOCAL HIGHLY DIFFERENTIATED THYROID CARCINOMAS ACCORDING TO THE TNM SYSTEM

The comparative analysis of mono- and multifocal highly differentiated thyroid carcinoma (papillary and follicular) according to the TNM system was conducted. There were analyzed 2208 cases of monofocal and 692 cases of multifocal lesions in total. The analysis demonstrated that multifocal carcinoma...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: N. Ya. Kobrynska
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ukrmedknyha Publishing House 2016-10-01
Series:Medična Informatika ta Inženerìâ
Online Access:http://ojs.tdmu.edu.ua/index.php/here/article/view/6760
id doaj-96ffb2f023b742378faac047d4dd5856
record_format Article
spelling doaj-96ffb2f023b742378faac047d4dd58562020-11-24T23:03:40ZengUkrmedknyha Publishing HouseMedična Informatika ta Inženerìâ1996-19601997-74682016-10-010310.11603/mie.1996-1960.2016.3.67606103EVALUATION OF PROGNOSIS IN MULTIFOCAL HIGHLY DIFFERENTIATED THYROID CARCINOMAS ACCORDING TO THE TNM SYSTEMN. Ya. Kobrynska0ДУ «Інститут ендокринології та обміну речовин ім. В. П. Комісаренка НАМН України»The comparative analysis of mono- and multifocal highly differentiated thyroid carcinoma (papillary and follicular) according to the TNM system was conducted. There were analyzed 2208 cases of monofocal and 692 cases of multifocal lesions in total. The analysis demonstrated that multifocal carcinomas, unlike solitary lesions, were characterized by a more aggressive course. Multicenter lesion by rubrics T, N and M with certainty at 99 % and more had higher indices than monofocal. Thus, T2 stage was recorded at 20.4 % of multifocal carcinomas versus 15.7 % for monofocal. The difference in T3 stage was also significant (22.4 % vs. 18.8 % respectively). In cases of T4 stage percent difference was 6.9 % with 5.0 % of multifocal and monofocal with thyroid carcinomas. N1a stage was recorded in 16.2 % of cases of multifocal carcinomas compared with 13.7 % for monofocal. Even more significant was the difference in N1b category - 15.7 % among multifocal that only 8.7 % of monofocal thyroid carcinomas. Distant metastases in patients with mono- and multifocal carcinoma were detected in isolated cases and this group of patients did not differ significantly from one another in such case (p > 0.05). The main conclusion is the need for more radical tactics of treatment in these cases.http://ojs.tdmu.edu.ua/index.php/here/article/view/6760
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author N. Ya. Kobrynska
spellingShingle N. Ya. Kobrynska
EVALUATION OF PROGNOSIS IN MULTIFOCAL HIGHLY DIFFERENTIATED THYROID CARCINOMAS ACCORDING TO THE TNM SYSTEM
Medična Informatika ta Inženerìâ
author_facet N. Ya. Kobrynska
author_sort N. Ya. Kobrynska
title EVALUATION OF PROGNOSIS IN MULTIFOCAL HIGHLY DIFFERENTIATED THYROID CARCINOMAS ACCORDING TO THE TNM SYSTEM
title_short EVALUATION OF PROGNOSIS IN MULTIFOCAL HIGHLY DIFFERENTIATED THYROID CARCINOMAS ACCORDING TO THE TNM SYSTEM
title_full EVALUATION OF PROGNOSIS IN MULTIFOCAL HIGHLY DIFFERENTIATED THYROID CARCINOMAS ACCORDING TO THE TNM SYSTEM
title_fullStr EVALUATION OF PROGNOSIS IN MULTIFOCAL HIGHLY DIFFERENTIATED THYROID CARCINOMAS ACCORDING TO THE TNM SYSTEM
title_full_unstemmed EVALUATION OF PROGNOSIS IN MULTIFOCAL HIGHLY DIFFERENTIATED THYROID CARCINOMAS ACCORDING TO THE TNM SYSTEM
title_sort evaluation of prognosis in multifocal highly differentiated thyroid carcinomas according to the tnm system
publisher Ukrmedknyha Publishing House
series Medična Informatika ta Inženerìâ
issn 1996-1960
1997-7468
publishDate 2016-10-01
description The comparative analysis of mono- and multifocal highly differentiated thyroid carcinoma (papillary and follicular) according to the TNM system was conducted. There were analyzed 2208 cases of monofocal and 692 cases of multifocal lesions in total. The analysis demonstrated that multifocal carcinomas, unlike solitary lesions, were characterized by a more aggressive course. Multicenter lesion by rubrics T, N and M with certainty at 99 % and more had higher indices than monofocal. Thus, T2 stage was recorded at 20.4 % of multifocal carcinomas versus 15.7 % for monofocal. The difference in T3 stage was also significant (22.4 % vs. 18.8 % respectively). In cases of T4 stage percent difference was 6.9 % with 5.0 % of multifocal and monofocal with thyroid carcinomas. N1a stage was recorded in 16.2 % of cases of multifocal carcinomas compared with 13.7 % for monofocal. Even more significant was the difference in N1b category - 15.7 % among multifocal that only 8.7 % of monofocal thyroid carcinomas. Distant metastases in patients with mono- and multifocal carcinoma were detected in isolated cases and this group of patients did not differ significantly from one another in such case (p > 0.05). The main conclusion is the need for more radical tactics of treatment in these cases.
url http://ojs.tdmu.edu.ua/index.php/here/article/view/6760
work_keys_str_mv AT nyakobrynska evaluationofprognosisinmultifocalhighlydifferentiatedthyroidcarcinomasaccordingtothetnmsystem
_version_ 1725632796352839680