Can metabolic prediction be an alternative to genomic prediction in barley?
Like other crop species, barley, the fourth most important crop worldwide, suffers from the genetic bottleneck effect, where further improvements in performance through classical breeding methods become difficult. Therefore, indirect selection methods are of great interest. Here, genomic prediction...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2020-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234052 |
id |
doaj-96fbc19910ff49ee88fad46fd1e8e727 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-96fbc19910ff49ee88fad46fd1e8e7272021-03-03T21:50:18ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01156e023405210.1371/journal.pone.0234052Can metabolic prediction be an alternative to genomic prediction in barley?Mathias Ruben GemmerChris RichterYong JiangThomas SchmutzerManish L RaoraneBjörn JunkerKlaus PillenAndreas MaurerLike other crop species, barley, the fourth most important crop worldwide, suffers from the genetic bottleneck effect, where further improvements in performance through classical breeding methods become difficult. Therefore, indirect selection methods are of great interest. Here, genomic prediction (GP) based on 33,005 SNP markers and, alternatively, metabolic prediction (MP) based on 128 metabolites with sampling at two different time points in one year, were applied to predict multi-year agronomic traits in the nested association mapping (NAM) population HEB-25. We found prediction abilities of up to 0.93 for plant height with SNP markers and of up to 0.61 for flowering time with metabolites. Interestingly, prediction abilities in GP increased after reducing the number of incorporated SNP markers. The estimated effects of GP and MP were highly concordant, indicating MP as an interesting alternative to GP, being able to reflect a stable genotype-specific metabolite profile. In MP, sampling at an early developmental stage outperformed sampling at a later stage. The results confirm the value of GP for future breeding. With MP, an interesting alternative was also applied successfully. However, based on our results, usage of MP alone cannot be recommended in barley. Nevertheless, MP can assist in unravelling physiological pathways for the expression of agronomically important traits.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234052 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mathias Ruben Gemmer Chris Richter Yong Jiang Thomas Schmutzer Manish L Raorane Björn Junker Klaus Pillen Andreas Maurer |
spellingShingle |
Mathias Ruben Gemmer Chris Richter Yong Jiang Thomas Schmutzer Manish L Raorane Björn Junker Klaus Pillen Andreas Maurer Can metabolic prediction be an alternative to genomic prediction in barley? PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Mathias Ruben Gemmer Chris Richter Yong Jiang Thomas Schmutzer Manish L Raorane Björn Junker Klaus Pillen Andreas Maurer |
author_sort |
Mathias Ruben Gemmer |
title |
Can metabolic prediction be an alternative to genomic prediction in barley? |
title_short |
Can metabolic prediction be an alternative to genomic prediction in barley? |
title_full |
Can metabolic prediction be an alternative to genomic prediction in barley? |
title_fullStr |
Can metabolic prediction be an alternative to genomic prediction in barley? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Can metabolic prediction be an alternative to genomic prediction in barley? |
title_sort |
can metabolic prediction be an alternative to genomic prediction in barley? |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
Like other crop species, barley, the fourth most important crop worldwide, suffers from the genetic bottleneck effect, where further improvements in performance through classical breeding methods become difficult. Therefore, indirect selection methods are of great interest. Here, genomic prediction (GP) based on 33,005 SNP markers and, alternatively, metabolic prediction (MP) based on 128 metabolites with sampling at two different time points in one year, were applied to predict multi-year agronomic traits in the nested association mapping (NAM) population HEB-25. We found prediction abilities of up to 0.93 for plant height with SNP markers and of up to 0.61 for flowering time with metabolites. Interestingly, prediction abilities in GP increased after reducing the number of incorporated SNP markers. The estimated effects of GP and MP were highly concordant, indicating MP as an interesting alternative to GP, being able to reflect a stable genotype-specific metabolite profile. In MP, sampling at an early developmental stage outperformed sampling at a later stage. The results confirm the value of GP for future breeding. With MP, an interesting alternative was also applied successfully. However, based on our results, usage of MP alone cannot be recommended in barley. Nevertheless, MP can assist in unravelling physiological pathways for the expression of agronomically important traits. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234052 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mathiasrubengemmer canmetabolicpredictionbeanalternativetogenomicpredictioninbarley AT chrisrichter canmetabolicpredictionbeanalternativetogenomicpredictioninbarley AT yongjiang canmetabolicpredictionbeanalternativetogenomicpredictioninbarley AT thomasschmutzer canmetabolicpredictionbeanalternativetogenomicpredictioninbarley AT manishlraorane canmetabolicpredictionbeanalternativetogenomicpredictioninbarley AT bjornjunker canmetabolicpredictionbeanalternativetogenomicpredictioninbarley AT klauspillen canmetabolicpredictionbeanalternativetogenomicpredictioninbarley AT andreasmaurer canmetabolicpredictionbeanalternativetogenomicpredictioninbarley |
_version_ |
1714814815368642560 |