Can metabolic prediction be an alternative to genomic prediction in barley?

Like other crop species, barley, the fourth most important crop worldwide, suffers from the genetic bottleneck effect, where further improvements in performance through classical breeding methods become difficult. Therefore, indirect selection methods are of great interest. Here, genomic prediction...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mathias Ruben Gemmer, Chris Richter, Yong Jiang, Thomas Schmutzer, Manish L Raorane, Björn Junker, Klaus Pillen, Andreas Maurer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234052
id doaj-96fbc19910ff49ee88fad46fd1e8e727
record_format Article
spelling doaj-96fbc19910ff49ee88fad46fd1e8e7272021-03-03T21:50:18ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01156e023405210.1371/journal.pone.0234052Can metabolic prediction be an alternative to genomic prediction in barley?Mathias Ruben GemmerChris RichterYong JiangThomas SchmutzerManish L RaoraneBjörn JunkerKlaus PillenAndreas MaurerLike other crop species, barley, the fourth most important crop worldwide, suffers from the genetic bottleneck effect, where further improvements in performance through classical breeding methods become difficult. Therefore, indirect selection methods are of great interest. Here, genomic prediction (GP) based on 33,005 SNP markers and, alternatively, metabolic prediction (MP) based on 128 metabolites with sampling at two different time points in one year, were applied to predict multi-year agronomic traits in the nested association mapping (NAM) population HEB-25. We found prediction abilities of up to 0.93 for plant height with SNP markers and of up to 0.61 for flowering time with metabolites. Interestingly, prediction abilities in GP increased after reducing the number of incorporated SNP markers. The estimated effects of GP and MP were highly concordant, indicating MP as an interesting alternative to GP, being able to reflect a stable genotype-specific metabolite profile. In MP, sampling at an early developmental stage outperformed sampling at a later stage. The results confirm the value of GP for future breeding. With MP, an interesting alternative was also applied successfully. However, based on our results, usage of MP alone cannot be recommended in barley. Nevertheless, MP can assist in unravelling physiological pathways for the expression of agronomically important traits.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234052
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mathias Ruben Gemmer
Chris Richter
Yong Jiang
Thomas Schmutzer
Manish L Raorane
Björn Junker
Klaus Pillen
Andreas Maurer
spellingShingle Mathias Ruben Gemmer
Chris Richter
Yong Jiang
Thomas Schmutzer
Manish L Raorane
Björn Junker
Klaus Pillen
Andreas Maurer
Can metabolic prediction be an alternative to genomic prediction in barley?
PLoS ONE
author_facet Mathias Ruben Gemmer
Chris Richter
Yong Jiang
Thomas Schmutzer
Manish L Raorane
Björn Junker
Klaus Pillen
Andreas Maurer
author_sort Mathias Ruben Gemmer
title Can metabolic prediction be an alternative to genomic prediction in barley?
title_short Can metabolic prediction be an alternative to genomic prediction in barley?
title_full Can metabolic prediction be an alternative to genomic prediction in barley?
title_fullStr Can metabolic prediction be an alternative to genomic prediction in barley?
title_full_unstemmed Can metabolic prediction be an alternative to genomic prediction in barley?
title_sort can metabolic prediction be an alternative to genomic prediction in barley?
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Like other crop species, barley, the fourth most important crop worldwide, suffers from the genetic bottleneck effect, where further improvements in performance through classical breeding methods become difficult. Therefore, indirect selection methods are of great interest. Here, genomic prediction (GP) based on 33,005 SNP markers and, alternatively, metabolic prediction (MP) based on 128 metabolites with sampling at two different time points in one year, were applied to predict multi-year agronomic traits in the nested association mapping (NAM) population HEB-25. We found prediction abilities of up to 0.93 for plant height with SNP markers and of up to 0.61 for flowering time with metabolites. Interestingly, prediction abilities in GP increased after reducing the number of incorporated SNP markers. The estimated effects of GP and MP were highly concordant, indicating MP as an interesting alternative to GP, being able to reflect a stable genotype-specific metabolite profile. In MP, sampling at an early developmental stage outperformed sampling at a later stage. The results confirm the value of GP for future breeding. With MP, an interesting alternative was also applied successfully. However, based on our results, usage of MP alone cannot be recommended in barley. Nevertheless, MP can assist in unravelling physiological pathways for the expression of agronomically important traits.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234052
work_keys_str_mv AT mathiasrubengemmer canmetabolicpredictionbeanalternativetogenomicpredictioninbarley
AT chrisrichter canmetabolicpredictionbeanalternativetogenomicpredictioninbarley
AT yongjiang canmetabolicpredictionbeanalternativetogenomicpredictioninbarley
AT thomasschmutzer canmetabolicpredictionbeanalternativetogenomicpredictioninbarley
AT manishlraorane canmetabolicpredictionbeanalternativetogenomicpredictioninbarley
AT bjornjunker canmetabolicpredictionbeanalternativetogenomicpredictioninbarley
AT klauspillen canmetabolicpredictionbeanalternativetogenomicpredictioninbarley
AT andreasmaurer canmetabolicpredictionbeanalternativetogenomicpredictioninbarley
_version_ 1714814815368642560