Systematic Analysis of Transrectal Prostate Biopsies Using an Ink Method and Specific Histopathologic Protocol: A Prospective Study

Background. Transrectal prostate biopsy is the standard protocol for the screening for prostate cancer. It helps to locate prostatic adenocarcinoma and plan treatment. However, the increasing number of prostate biopsies leads to considerably greater costs for the pathology laboratories. In this stud...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David Parada, Nahum Calvo, Karla Peña, Vanesa Morente, Rosana Queralt, Pilar Hernandez, Francesc Riu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2011-01-01
Series:Prostate Cancer
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/380249
id doaj-96fa833c25124d3d89bf88d3e67bd73b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-96fa833c25124d3d89bf88d3e67bd73b2020-11-24T23:32:24ZengHindawi LimitedProstate Cancer2090-31112090-312X2011-01-01201110.1155/2011/380249380249Systematic Analysis of Transrectal Prostate Biopsies Using an Ink Method and Specific Histopathologic Protocol: A Prospective StudyDavid Parada0Nahum Calvo1Karla Peña2Vanesa Morente3Rosana Queralt4Pilar Hernandez5Francesc Riu6Servei de Patologia i, Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, Tarragona 43206, Reus, SpainCRC Corporación Sanitària, Tarragona, Reus, SpainServei de Patologia i, Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, Tarragona 43206, Reus, SpainServei de Patologia i, Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, Tarragona 43206, Reus, SpainServei de Patologia i, Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, Tarragona 43206, Reus, SpainEpidemiología, Estadística y Bioinformática, Institut d'Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili (IISPV), Tarragona, Reus, SpainServei de Patologia i, Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, Tarragona 43206, Reus, SpainBackground. Transrectal prostate biopsy is the standard protocol for the screening for prostate cancer. It helps to locate prostatic adenocarcinoma and plan treatment. However, the increasing number of prostate biopsies leads to considerably greater costs for the pathology laboratories. In this study, we compare the traditional method with an ink method in combination with a systematic histopathologic protocol. Methods. Two hundred consecutive transrectal prostate biopsy specimens were received from the radiology department. They were separated into two groups: one hundred were processed as six different specimens in the usual manner. The other one hundred were submitted in six containers, the apex, base, and middle section of which were stained different colours. The samples subject to the ink method were embedded in paraffin and placed in two cassettes which were sectioned using a specific protocol. Results. The comparative study of the nonink and ink methods for histopathologic diagnosis showed no statistical differences as far as diagnostic categories were concerned (𝑃value<.005). The number of PIN diagnoses increased when the ink method was used, but no statistical differences were found. The ink method led to a cost reduction of 48.86%. Conclusions. Our ink method combined with a specific histopathologic protocol provided the same diagnostic quality, tumor location information as the traditional method, and lower pathology expenses.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/380249
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author David Parada
Nahum Calvo
Karla Peña
Vanesa Morente
Rosana Queralt
Pilar Hernandez
Francesc Riu
spellingShingle David Parada
Nahum Calvo
Karla Peña
Vanesa Morente
Rosana Queralt
Pilar Hernandez
Francesc Riu
Systematic Analysis of Transrectal Prostate Biopsies Using an Ink Method and Specific Histopathologic Protocol: A Prospective Study
Prostate Cancer
author_facet David Parada
Nahum Calvo
Karla Peña
Vanesa Morente
Rosana Queralt
Pilar Hernandez
Francesc Riu
author_sort David Parada
title Systematic Analysis of Transrectal Prostate Biopsies Using an Ink Method and Specific Histopathologic Protocol: A Prospective Study
title_short Systematic Analysis of Transrectal Prostate Biopsies Using an Ink Method and Specific Histopathologic Protocol: A Prospective Study
title_full Systematic Analysis of Transrectal Prostate Biopsies Using an Ink Method and Specific Histopathologic Protocol: A Prospective Study
title_fullStr Systematic Analysis of Transrectal Prostate Biopsies Using an Ink Method and Specific Histopathologic Protocol: A Prospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Analysis of Transrectal Prostate Biopsies Using an Ink Method and Specific Histopathologic Protocol: A Prospective Study
title_sort systematic analysis of transrectal prostate biopsies using an ink method and specific histopathologic protocol: a prospective study
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Prostate Cancer
issn 2090-3111
2090-312X
publishDate 2011-01-01
description Background. Transrectal prostate biopsy is the standard protocol for the screening for prostate cancer. It helps to locate prostatic adenocarcinoma and plan treatment. However, the increasing number of prostate biopsies leads to considerably greater costs for the pathology laboratories. In this study, we compare the traditional method with an ink method in combination with a systematic histopathologic protocol. Methods. Two hundred consecutive transrectal prostate biopsy specimens were received from the radiology department. They were separated into two groups: one hundred were processed as six different specimens in the usual manner. The other one hundred were submitted in six containers, the apex, base, and middle section of which were stained different colours. The samples subject to the ink method were embedded in paraffin and placed in two cassettes which were sectioned using a specific protocol. Results. The comparative study of the nonink and ink methods for histopathologic diagnosis showed no statistical differences as far as diagnostic categories were concerned (𝑃value<.005). The number of PIN diagnoses increased when the ink method was used, but no statistical differences were found. The ink method led to a cost reduction of 48.86%. Conclusions. Our ink method combined with a specific histopathologic protocol provided the same diagnostic quality, tumor location information as the traditional method, and lower pathology expenses.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/380249
work_keys_str_mv AT davidparada systematicanalysisoftransrectalprostatebiopsiesusinganinkmethodandspecifichistopathologicprotocolaprospectivestudy
AT nahumcalvo systematicanalysisoftransrectalprostatebiopsiesusinganinkmethodandspecifichistopathologicprotocolaprospectivestudy
AT karlapena systematicanalysisoftransrectalprostatebiopsiesusinganinkmethodandspecifichistopathologicprotocolaprospectivestudy
AT vanesamorente systematicanalysisoftransrectalprostatebiopsiesusinganinkmethodandspecifichistopathologicprotocolaprospectivestudy
AT rosanaqueralt systematicanalysisoftransrectalprostatebiopsiesusinganinkmethodandspecifichistopathologicprotocolaprospectivestudy
AT pilarhernandez systematicanalysisoftransrectalprostatebiopsiesusinganinkmethodandspecifichistopathologicprotocolaprospectivestudy
AT francescriu systematicanalysisoftransrectalprostatebiopsiesusinganinkmethodandspecifichistopathologicprotocolaprospectivestudy
_version_ 1725534253001736192