A comparison between mesospheric wind measurements made near Christchurch (44°S, 173°E) using the high resolution doppler imager (HRDI) and a medium frequency (MF) radar

We report on the comparison of winds measured by a medium frequency (MF) radar near Christchurch, New Zealand, and by the high resolution doppler imager (HRDI). Previous comparisons have demonstrated that there can be significant differences in the winds obtained by the two techniques, and our r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D. J. Frame, B. N. Lawrence, G. J. Fraser, M. D. Burrage
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2000-05-01
Series:Annales Geophysicae
Online Access:https://www.ann-geophys.net/18/555/2000/angeo-18-555-2000.pdf
id doaj-96e80f8261514a2bbf25b983e6155b4d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-96e80f8261514a2bbf25b983e6155b4d2020-11-24T23:16:24ZengCopernicus PublicationsAnnales Geophysicae0992-76891432-05762000-05-011855556510.1007/s00585-000-0555-3A comparison between mesospheric wind measurements made near Christchurch (44°S, 173°E) using the high resolution doppler imager (HRDI) and a medium frequency (MF) radarD. J. Frame0D. J. Frame1D. J. Frame2B. N. Lawrence3G. J. Fraser4M. D. Burrage5<i>Correspondence to:</i> B. N. LawrenceDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Canterbury, NZe-mail: b.lawrence@phys.canterbury.ac.nzDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Canterbury, NZDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Canterbury, NZSpace Physics Research Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USAWe report on the comparison of winds measured by a medium frequency (MF) radar near Christchurch, New Zealand, and by the high resolution doppler imager (HRDI). Previous comparisons have demonstrated that there can be significant differences in the winds obtained by the two techniques, and our results are no different. However, these data show relatively good agreement in the meridional direction, but large differences in the zonal direction, where the radar is regularly measuring the zonal wind as too easterly. To do the comparison, overpasses from the satellite must be obtained when it is close to the radar site. The radar data are averaged in time around the overpass because we know the radars sample phenomena which have spatial and temporal scales which make them invisible to HRDI. There are a limited number of overpass comparisons which limit our confidence in these results, but a detailed analysis of these data show that the proximity of the overpass is often an important factor in the differences obtained. Other factors examined include the influence of the local time of the overpass, and the amount of radar data averaged around the overpass time.<br><br><b>Key words:</b> Atmospheric composition and structure (instruments and techniques) · Meteorology and atmospheric dynamics (middle atmosphere dynamics; instruments and techniques)https://www.ann-geophys.net/18/555/2000/angeo-18-555-2000.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author D. J. Frame
D. J. Frame
D. J. Frame
B. N. Lawrence
G. J. Fraser
M. D. Burrage
spellingShingle D. J. Frame
D. J. Frame
D. J. Frame
B. N. Lawrence
G. J. Fraser
M. D. Burrage
A comparison between mesospheric wind measurements made near Christchurch (44°S, 173°E) using the high resolution doppler imager (HRDI) and a medium frequency (MF) radar
Annales Geophysicae
author_facet D. J. Frame
D. J. Frame
D. J. Frame
B. N. Lawrence
G. J. Fraser
M. D. Burrage
author_sort D. J. Frame
title A comparison between mesospheric wind measurements made near Christchurch (44°S, 173°E) using the high resolution doppler imager (HRDI) and a medium frequency (MF) radar
title_short A comparison between mesospheric wind measurements made near Christchurch (44°S, 173°E) using the high resolution doppler imager (HRDI) and a medium frequency (MF) radar
title_full A comparison between mesospheric wind measurements made near Christchurch (44°S, 173°E) using the high resolution doppler imager (HRDI) and a medium frequency (MF) radar
title_fullStr A comparison between mesospheric wind measurements made near Christchurch (44°S, 173°E) using the high resolution doppler imager (HRDI) and a medium frequency (MF) radar
title_full_unstemmed A comparison between mesospheric wind measurements made near Christchurch (44°S, 173°E) using the high resolution doppler imager (HRDI) and a medium frequency (MF) radar
title_sort comparison between mesospheric wind measurements made near christchurch (44°s, 173°e) using the high resolution doppler imager (hrdi) and a medium frequency (mf) radar
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Annales Geophysicae
issn 0992-7689
1432-0576
publishDate 2000-05-01
description We report on the comparison of winds measured by a medium frequency (MF) radar near Christchurch, New Zealand, and by the high resolution doppler imager (HRDI). Previous comparisons have demonstrated that there can be significant differences in the winds obtained by the two techniques, and our results are no different. However, these data show relatively good agreement in the meridional direction, but large differences in the zonal direction, where the radar is regularly measuring the zonal wind as too easterly. To do the comparison, overpasses from the satellite must be obtained when it is close to the radar site. The radar data are averaged in time around the overpass because we know the radars sample phenomena which have spatial and temporal scales which make them invisible to HRDI. There are a limited number of overpass comparisons which limit our confidence in these results, but a detailed analysis of these data show that the proximity of the overpass is often an important factor in the differences obtained. Other factors examined include the influence of the local time of the overpass, and the amount of radar data averaged around the overpass time.<br><br><b>Key words:</b> Atmospheric composition and structure (instruments and techniques) · Meteorology and atmospheric dynamics (middle atmosphere dynamics; instruments and techniques)
url https://www.ann-geophys.net/18/555/2000/angeo-18-555-2000.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT djframe acomparisonbetweenmesosphericwindmeasurementsmadenearchristchurch44s173eusingthehighresolutiondopplerimagerhrdiandamediumfrequencymfradar
AT djframe acomparisonbetweenmesosphericwindmeasurementsmadenearchristchurch44s173eusingthehighresolutiondopplerimagerhrdiandamediumfrequencymfradar
AT djframe acomparisonbetweenmesosphericwindmeasurementsmadenearchristchurch44s173eusingthehighresolutiondopplerimagerhrdiandamediumfrequencymfradar
AT bnlawrence acomparisonbetweenmesosphericwindmeasurementsmadenearchristchurch44s173eusingthehighresolutiondopplerimagerhrdiandamediumfrequencymfradar
AT gjfraser acomparisonbetweenmesosphericwindmeasurementsmadenearchristchurch44s173eusingthehighresolutiondopplerimagerhrdiandamediumfrequencymfradar
AT mdburrage acomparisonbetweenmesosphericwindmeasurementsmadenearchristchurch44s173eusingthehighresolutiondopplerimagerhrdiandamediumfrequencymfradar
AT djframe comparisonbetweenmesosphericwindmeasurementsmadenearchristchurch44s173eusingthehighresolutiondopplerimagerhrdiandamediumfrequencymfradar
AT djframe comparisonbetweenmesosphericwindmeasurementsmadenearchristchurch44s173eusingthehighresolutiondopplerimagerhrdiandamediumfrequencymfradar
AT djframe comparisonbetweenmesosphericwindmeasurementsmadenearchristchurch44s173eusingthehighresolutiondopplerimagerhrdiandamediumfrequencymfradar
AT bnlawrence comparisonbetweenmesosphericwindmeasurementsmadenearchristchurch44s173eusingthehighresolutiondopplerimagerhrdiandamediumfrequencymfradar
AT gjfraser comparisonbetweenmesosphericwindmeasurementsmadenearchristchurch44s173eusingthehighresolutiondopplerimagerhrdiandamediumfrequencymfradar
AT mdburrage comparisonbetweenmesosphericwindmeasurementsmadenearchristchurch44s173eusingthehighresolutiondopplerimagerhrdiandamediumfrequencymfradar
_version_ 1725587476804796416