A comparison between mesospheric wind measurements made near Christchurch (44°S, 173°E) using the high resolution doppler imager (HRDI) and a medium frequency (MF) radar
We report on the comparison of winds measured by a medium frequency (MF) radar near Christchurch, New Zealand, and by the high resolution doppler imager (HRDI). Previous comparisons have demonstrated that there can be significant differences in the winds obtained by the two techniques, and our r...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2000-05-01
|
Series: | Annales Geophysicae |
Online Access: | https://www.ann-geophys.net/18/555/2000/angeo-18-555-2000.pdf |
id |
doaj-96e80f8261514a2bbf25b983e6155b4d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-96e80f8261514a2bbf25b983e6155b4d2020-11-24T23:16:24ZengCopernicus PublicationsAnnales Geophysicae0992-76891432-05762000-05-011855556510.1007/s00585-000-0555-3A comparison between mesospheric wind measurements made near Christchurch (44°S, 173°E) using the high resolution doppler imager (HRDI) and a medium frequency (MF) radarD. J. Frame0D. J. Frame1D. J. Frame2B. N. Lawrence3G. J. Fraser4M. D. Burrage5<i>Correspondence to:</i> B. N. LawrenceDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Canterbury, NZe-mail: b.lawrence@phys.canterbury.ac.nzDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Canterbury, NZDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Canterbury, NZSpace Physics Research Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USAWe report on the comparison of winds measured by a medium frequency (MF) radar near Christchurch, New Zealand, and by the high resolution doppler imager (HRDI). Previous comparisons have demonstrated that there can be significant differences in the winds obtained by the two techniques, and our results are no different. However, these data show relatively good agreement in the meridional direction, but large differences in the zonal direction, where the radar is regularly measuring the zonal wind as too easterly. To do the comparison, overpasses from the satellite must be obtained when it is close to the radar site. The radar data are averaged in time around the overpass because we know the radars sample phenomena which have spatial and temporal scales which make them invisible to HRDI. There are a limited number of overpass comparisons which limit our confidence in these results, but a detailed analysis of these data show that the proximity of the overpass is often an important factor in the differences obtained. Other factors examined include the influence of the local time of the overpass, and the amount of radar data averaged around the overpass time.<br><br><b>Key words:</b> Atmospheric composition and structure (instruments and techniques) · Meteorology and atmospheric dynamics (middle atmosphere dynamics; instruments and techniques)https://www.ann-geophys.net/18/555/2000/angeo-18-555-2000.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
D. J. Frame D. J. Frame D. J. Frame B. N. Lawrence G. J. Fraser M. D. Burrage |
spellingShingle |
D. J. Frame D. J. Frame D. J. Frame B. N. Lawrence G. J. Fraser M. D. Burrage A comparison between mesospheric wind measurements made near Christchurch (44°S, 173°E) using the high resolution doppler imager (HRDI) and a medium frequency (MF) radar Annales Geophysicae |
author_facet |
D. J. Frame D. J. Frame D. J. Frame B. N. Lawrence G. J. Fraser M. D. Burrage |
author_sort |
D. J. Frame |
title |
A comparison between mesospheric wind measurements made near Christchurch (44°S, 173°E) using the high resolution doppler imager (HRDI) and a medium frequency (MF) radar |
title_short |
A comparison between mesospheric wind measurements made near Christchurch (44°S, 173°E) using the high resolution doppler imager (HRDI) and a medium frequency (MF) radar |
title_full |
A comparison between mesospheric wind measurements made near Christchurch (44°S, 173°E) using the high resolution doppler imager (HRDI) and a medium frequency (MF) radar |
title_fullStr |
A comparison between mesospheric wind measurements made near Christchurch (44°S, 173°E) using the high resolution doppler imager (HRDI) and a medium frequency (MF) radar |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparison between mesospheric wind measurements made near Christchurch (44°S, 173°E) using the high resolution doppler imager (HRDI) and a medium frequency (MF) radar |
title_sort |
comparison between mesospheric wind measurements made near christchurch (44°s, 173°e) using the high resolution doppler imager (hrdi) and a medium frequency (mf) radar |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Annales Geophysicae |
issn |
0992-7689 1432-0576 |
publishDate |
2000-05-01 |
description |
We report on the comparison of winds measured
by a medium frequency (MF) radar near Christchurch, New Zealand, and by the high
resolution doppler imager (HRDI). Previous comparisons have demonstrated that
there can be significant differences in the winds obtained by the two
techniques, and our results are no different. However, these data show
relatively good agreement in the meridional direction, but large differences in
the zonal direction, where the radar is regularly measuring the zonal wind as
too easterly. To do the comparison, overpasses from the satellite must be
obtained when it is close to the radar site. The radar data are averaged in time
around the overpass because we know the radars sample phenomena which have
spatial and temporal scales which make them invisible to HRDI. There are a
limited number of overpass comparisons which limit our confidence in these
results, but a detailed analysis of these data show that the proximity of the
overpass is often an important factor in the differences obtained. Other factors
examined include the influence of the local time of the overpass, and the amount
of radar data averaged around the overpass time.<br><br><b>Key words:</b> Atmospheric composition and structure
(instruments and techniques) · Meteorology and atmospheric dynamics (middle
atmosphere dynamics; instruments and techniques) |
url |
https://www.ann-geophys.net/18/555/2000/angeo-18-555-2000.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT djframe acomparisonbetweenmesosphericwindmeasurementsmadenearchristchurch44s173eusingthehighresolutiondopplerimagerhrdiandamediumfrequencymfradar AT djframe acomparisonbetweenmesosphericwindmeasurementsmadenearchristchurch44s173eusingthehighresolutiondopplerimagerhrdiandamediumfrequencymfradar AT djframe acomparisonbetweenmesosphericwindmeasurementsmadenearchristchurch44s173eusingthehighresolutiondopplerimagerhrdiandamediumfrequencymfradar AT bnlawrence acomparisonbetweenmesosphericwindmeasurementsmadenearchristchurch44s173eusingthehighresolutiondopplerimagerhrdiandamediumfrequencymfradar AT gjfraser acomparisonbetweenmesosphericwindmeasurementsmadenearchristchurch44s173eusingthehighresolutiondopplerimagerhrdiandamediumfrequencymfradar AT mdburrage acomparisonbetweenmesosphericwindmeasurementsmadenearchristchurch44s173eusingthehighresolutiondopplerimagerhrdiandamediumfrequencymfradar AT djframe comparisonbetweenmesosphericwindmeasurementsmadenearchristchurch44s173eusingthehighresolutiondopplerimagerhrdiandamediumfrequencymfradar AT djframe comparisonbetweenmesosphericwindmeasurementsmadenearchristchurch44s173eusingthehighresolutiondopplerimagerhrdiandamediumfrequencymfradar AT djframe comparisonbetweenmesosphericwindmeasurementsmadenearchristchurch44s173eusingthehighresolutiondopplerimagerhrdiandamediumfrequencymfradar AT bnlawrence comparisonbetweenmesosphericwindmeasurementsmadenearchristchurch44s173eusingthehighresolutiondopplerimagerhrdiandamediumfrequencymfradar AT gjfraser comparisonbetweenmesosphericwindmeasurementsmadenearchristchurch44s173eusingthehighresolutiondopplerimagerhrdiandamediumfrequencymfradar AT mdburrage comparisonbetweenmesosphericwindmeasurementsmadenearchristchurch44s173eusingthehighresolutiondopplerimagerhrdiandamediumfrequencymfradar |
_version_ |
1725587476804796416 |