Multiple voices: Learners reflect on literature

Background: Much of the research in literacy focuses on what learners fail to do, especially in the early grades, but it is equally important to research successful readers. In particular learners’ experiences with literature contribute to our understanding of the possibilities literary texts offer....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jessamy Kromhout, Eileen Scheckle
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2021-08-01
Series:Reading & Writing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://rw.org.za/index.php/rw/article/view/304
id doaj-96ca5ebca5f142cf8d376db5701674b7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-96ca5ebca5f142cf8d376db5701674b72021-09-03T09:13:31ZengAOSISReading & Writing2079-82452308-14222021-08-01121e1e810.4102/rw.v12i1.304136Multiple voices: Learners reflect on literatureJessamy Kromhout0Eileen Scheckle1Collegiate Girls’ High School, Port ElizabethFaculty of Education, Nelson Mandela University, Port ElizabethBackground: Much of the research in literacy focuses on what learners fail to do, especially in the early grades, but it is equally important to research successful readers. In particular learners’ experiences with literature contribute to our understanding of the possibilities literary texts offer. This article focused on learners’ responses to Advanced Programme (AP) English, which was an optional subject offered at an ex-Model C school, to understand how the learners had taken up these literary texts. Objectives: This study explored how matric learners spoke about the literature they had studied, in their AP English, in an informal group meeting. Methods: A qualitative case study was used to explore learners’ responses to literature. A final focus group meeting at the end of their matric year provides the data for this article. The transcriptions were coded using repeated patterns for themes to explore the stances taken in relation to the literature whether efferent or aesthetic. Results: The data showed how learners had incorporated fragments from the literature into their own utterances so that their language use echoed the literature. In addition to an efferent exam focus, the literature and AP English practices were used in both Art and Home Language English examinations. Conclusions: Learners need opportunities to talk about the multiple voices of literature in their lives. This kind of talk offers a different perspective on how literature can enrich, disrupt and extend learners’ thinking about literature and themselves. This research offers a counterpoint to examination results and contributes to building a nation of readers.https://rw.org.za/index.php/rw/article/view/304advanced programme englishliteraturebakhtindialogueefferent and aesthetic responsesthe waste landmultiple voices
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jessamy Kromhout
Eileen Scheckle
spellingShingle Jessamy Kromhout
Eileen Scheckle
Multiple voices: Learners reflect on literature
Reading & Writing
advanced programme english
literature
bakhtin
dialogue
efferent and aesthetic responses
the waste land
multiple voices
author_facet Jessamy Kromhout
Eileen Scheckle
author_sort Jessamy Kromhout
title Multiple voices: Learners reflect on literature
title_short Multiple voices: Learners reflect on literature
title_full Multiple voices: Learners reflect on literature
title_fullStr Multiple voices: Learners reflect on literature
title_full_unstemmed Multiple voices: Learners reflect on literature
title_sort multiple voices: learners reflect on literature
publisher AOSIS
series Reading & Writing
issn 2079-8245
2308-1422
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Background: Much of the research in literacy focuses on what learners fail to do, especially in the early grades, but it is equally important to research successful readers. In particular learners’ experiences with literature contribute to our understanding of the possibilities literary texts offer. This article focused on learners’ responses to Advanced Programme (AP) English, which was an optional subject offered at an ex-Model C school, to understand how the learners had taken up these literary texts. Objectives: This study explored how matric learners spoke about the literature they had studied, in their AP English, in an informal group meeting. Methods: A qualitative case study was used to explore learners’ responses to literature. A final focus group meeting at the end of their matric year provides the data for this article. The transcriptions were coded using repeated patterns for themes to explore the stances taken in relation to the literature whether efferent or aesthetic. Results: The data showed how learners had incorporated fragments from the literature into their own utterances so that their language use echoed the literature. In addition to an efferent exam focus, the literature and AP English practices were used in both Art and Home Language English examinations. Conclusions: Learners need opportunities to talk about the multiple voices of literature in their lives. This kind of talk offers a different perspective on how literature can enrich, disrupt and extend learners’ thinking about literature and themselves. This research offers a counterpoint to examination results and contributes to building a nation of readers.
topic advanced programme english
literature
bakhtin
dialogue
efferent and aesthetic responses
the waste land
multiple voices
url https://rw.org.za/index.php/rw/article/view/304
work_keys_str_mv AT jessamykromhout multiplevoiceslearnersreflectonliterature
AT eileenscheckle multiplevoiceslearnersreflectonliterature
_version_ 1717817609161801728