Recapturing the status of indigenous knowledge and its relation to Western science

Western science has become epistemically and politically correct over the last two or three centuries (in the West, and then elsewhere). Its practical correctness has been underpinned by claims about utility, about technological and other goodies derived from science – a sort of internal cargo cult,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Arie Rip
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of the Western Cape 2019-06-01
Series:Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning
Online Access:http://cristal.ac.za/index.php/cristal/article/view/200
id doaj-96c93611b76c44bd8b282fc387be1916
record_format Article
spelling doaj-96c93611b76c44bd8b282fc387be19162020-11-25T02:52:25ZengUniversity of the Western CapeCritical Studies in Teaching and Learning2310-71032019-06-01718610710.14426/cristal.v7i1.200200Recapturing the status of indigenous knowledge and its relation to Western scienceArie Rip0University of TwenteWestern science has become epistemically and politically correct over the last two or three centuries (in the West, and then elsewhere). Its practical correctness has been underpinned by claims about utility, about technological and other goodies derived from science – a sort of internal cargo cult, but one which is coming under pressure in the risk society. Indigenous knowledge is becoming practically correct (as an as yet insufficiently tapped resource for development) and politically correct (cf. reconciliation). Is it now also epistemically correct? For that matter, how ‘correct’ is Western science here? I will use sociology of knowledge insights to address these questions, after outlining the structure of debate and practice on indigenous knowledge.http://cristal.ac.za/index.php/cristal/article/view/200
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Arie Rip
spellingShingle Arie Rip
Recapturing the status of indigenous knowledge and its relation to Western science
Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning
author_facet Arie Rip
author_sort Arie Rip
title Recapturing the status of indigenous knowledge and its relation to Western science
title_short Recapturing the status of indigenous knowledge and its relation to Western science
title_full Recapturing the status of indigenous knowledge and its relation to Western science
title_fullStr Recapturing the status of indigenous knowledge and its relation to Western science
title_full_unstemmed Recapturing the status of indigenous knowledge and its relation to Western science
title_sort recapturing the status of indigenous knowledge and its relation to western science
publisher University of the Western Cape
series Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning
issn 2310-7103
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Western science has become epistemically and politically correct over the last two or three centuries (in the West, and then elsewhere). Its practical correctness has been underpinned by claims about utility, about technological and other goodies derived from science – a sort of internal cargo cult, but one which is coming under pressure in the risk society. Indigenous knowledge is becoming practically correct (as an as yet insufficiently tapped resource for development) and politically correct (cf. reconciliation). Is it now also epistemically correct? For that matter, how ‘correct’ is Western science here? I will use sociology of knowledge insights to address these questions, after outlining the structure of debate and practice on indigenous knowledge.
url http://cristal.ac.za/index.php/cristal/article/view/200
work_keys_str_mv AT arierip recapturingthestatusofindigenousknowledgeanditsrelationtowesternscience
_version_ 1724730280872247296