Recapturing the status of indigenous knowledge and its relation to Western science
Western science has become epistemically and politically correct over the last two or three centuries (in the West, and then elsewhere). Its practical correctness has been underpinned by claims about utility, about technological and other goodies derived from science – a sort of internal cargo cult,...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of the Western Cape
2019-06-01
|
Series: | Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning |
Online Access: | http://cristal.ac.za/index.php/cristal/article/view/200 |
id |
doaj-96c93611b76c44bd8b282fc387be1916 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-96c93611b76c44bd8b282fc387be19162020-11-25T02:52:25ZengUniversity of the Western CapeCritical Studies in Teaching and Learning2310-71032019-06-01718610710.14426/cristal.v7i1.200200Recapturing the status of indigenous knowledge and its relation to Western scienceArie Rip0University of TwenteWestern science has become epistemically and politically correct over the last two or three centuries (in the West, and then elsewhere). Its practical correctness has been underpinned by claims about utility, about technological and other goodies derived from science – a sort of internal cargo cult, but one which is coming under pressure in the risk society. Indigenous knowledge is becoming practically correct (as an as yet insufficiently tapped resource for development) and politically correct (cf. reconciliation). Is it now also epistemically correct? For that matter, how ‘correct’ is Western science here? I will use sociology of knowledge insights to address these questions, after outlining the structure of debate and practice on indigenous knowledge.http://cristal.ac.za/index.php/cristal/article/view/200 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Arie Rip |
spellingShingle |
Arie Rip Recapturing the status of indigenous knowledge and its relation to Western science Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning |
author_facet |
Arie Rip |
author_sort |
Arie Rip |
title |
Recapturing the status of indigenous knowledge and its relation to Western science |
title_short |
Recapturing the status of indigenous knowledge and its relation to Western science |
title_full |
Recapturing the status of indigenous knowledge and its relation to Western science |
title_fullStr |
Recapturing the status of indigenous knowledge and its relation to Western science |
title_full_unstemmed |
Recapturing the status of indigenous knowledge and its relation to Western science |
title_sort |
recapturing the status of indigenous knowledge and its relation to western science |
publisher |
University of the Western Cape |
series |
Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning |
issn |
2310-7103 |
publishDate |
2019-06-01 |
description |
Western science has become epistemically and politically correct over the last two or three centuries (in the West, and then elsewhere). Its practical correctness has been underpinned by claims about utility, about technological and other goodies derived from science – a sort of internal cargo cult, but one which is coming under pressure in the risk society. Indigenous knowledge is becoming practically correct (as an as yet insufficiently tapped resource for development) and politically correct (cf. reconciliation). Is it now also epistemically correct? For that matter, how ‘correct’ is Western science here? I will use sociology of knowledge insights to address these questions, after outlining the structure of debate and practice on indigenous knowledge. |
url |
http://cristal.ac.za/index.php/cristal/article/view/200 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT arierip recapturingthestatusofindigenousknowledgeanditsrelationtowesternscience |
_version_ |
1724730280872247296 |