Advanced Statistical Analysis of 3D Kinect Data: A Comparison of the Classification Methods

• Main Authors: Lenka Červená, Pavel Kříž, Jan Kohout, Martin Vejvar, Ludmila Verešpejová, Karel Štícha, Jan Crha, Kateřina Trnková, Martin Chovanec, Jan Mareš
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI AG 2021-05-01
• Series: Applied Sciences
• Subjects: rehabilitation; House–Brackmann scale; functional data analysis; ordinal classification; Kinect evaluation
• Online Access: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/10/4572

This paper focuses on the statistical analysis of mimetic muscle rehabilitation after head and neck surgery causing facial paresis in patients after head and neck surgery. Our work deals with an evaluation problem of mimetic muscle rehabilitation that is observed by a Kinect stereo-vision camera. After a specific brain surgery, patients are often affected by face palsy, and rehabilitation to renew mimetic muscle innervation takes several months. It is important to be able to observe the rehabilitation process in an objective way. The most commonly used House–Brackmann (HB) scale is based on the clinician’s subjective opinion. This paper compares different methods of supervised learning classification that should be independent of the clinician’s opinion. We compare a parametric model (based on logistic regression), non-parametric model (based on random forests), and neural networks. The classification problem that we have studied combines a limited dataset (it contains only 122 measurements of 93 patients) of complex observations (each measurement consists of a collection of time curves) with an ordinal response variable. To balance the frequencies of the considered classes in our data set, we reclassified the samples from HB4 to HB3 and HB5 to HB6—it means that only four HB grades are used for classification algorithm. The parametric statistical model was found to be the most suitable thanks to its stability, tractability, and reasonable performance in terms of both accuracy and precision.