Statistical analysis of survival models using feature quantification on prostate cancer histopathological images

Background: Grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma is based on the Gleason scoring system and the more recently established prognostic grade groups. Typically, prostate cancer grading is performed by pathologists based on the morphology of the tumor on hematoxylin and eosin (H and E) slides. In this st...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jian Ren, Eric A Singer, Evita Sadimin, David J Foran, Xin Qi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2019-01-01
Series:Journal of Pathology Informatics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jpathinformatics.org/article.asp?issn=2153-3539;year=2019;volume=10;issue=1;spage=30;epage=30;aulast=Ren
id doaj-96be7a3821a54d7dbfbca2c957024217
record_format Article
spelling doaj-96be7a3821a54d7dbfbca2c9570242172020-11-25T02:47:40ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pathology Informatics2153-35392153-35392019-01-01101303010.4103/jpi.jpi_85_18Statistical analysis of survival models using feature quantification on prostate cancer histopathological imagesJian RenEric A SingerEvita SadiminDavid J ForanXin QiBackground: Grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma is based on the Gleason scoring system and the more recently established prognostic grade groups. Typically, prostate cancer grading is performed by pathologists based on the morphology of the tumor on hematoxylin and eosin (H and E) slides. In this study, we investigated the histopathological image features with various survival models and attempted to study their correlations. Methods: Three texture methods (speeded-up robust features, histogram of oriented gradient, and local binary pattern) and two convolutional neural network (CNN)-based methods were applied to quantify histopathological image features. Five survival models were assessed on those image features in the context with other prostate clinical prognostic factors, including primary and secondary Gleason patterns, prostate-specific antigen levels, age, and clinical tumor stages. Results: Based on statistical comparisons among different image features with survival models, image features from CNN-based method with a recurrent neural network called CNN-long-short-term memory provided the highest hazard ratio of prostate cancer recurrence under Cox regression with an elastic net penalty. Conclusions: This approach outperformed the other image quantification methods listed above. Using this approach, patient outcomes were highly correlated with the histopathological image features of the tissue samples. In future studies, we plan to investigate the potential use of this approach for predicting recurrence in a wider range of cancer types.http://www.jpathinformatics.org/article.asp?issn=2153-3539;year=2019;volume=10;issue=1;spage=30;epage=30;aulast=Renhistopathological imageimage featuresneural networksprostate cancersurvival models
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jian Ren
Eric A Singer
Evita Sadimin
David J Foran
Xin Qi
spellingShingle Jian Ren
Eric A Singer
Evita Sadimin
David J Foran
Xin Qi
Statistical analysis of survival models using feature quantification on prostate cancer histopathological images
Journal of Pathology Informatics
histopathological image
image features
neural networks
prostate cancer
survival models
author_facet Jian Ren
Eric A Singer
Evita Sadimin
David J Foran
Xin Qi
author_sort Jian Ren
title Statistical analysis of survival models using feature quantification on prostate cancer histopathological images
title_short Statistical analysis of survival models using feature quantification on prostate cancer histopathological images
title_full Statistical analysis of survival models using feature quantification on prostate cancer histopathological images
title_fullStr Statistical analysis of survival models using feature quantification on prostate cancer histopathological images
title_full_unstemmed Statistical analysis of survival models using feature quantification on prostate cancer histopathological images
title_sort statistical analysis of survival models using feature quantification on prostate cancer histopathological images
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Pathology Informatics
issn 2153-3539
2153-3539
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Background: Grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma is based on the Gleason scoring system and the more recently established prognostic grade groups. Typically, prostate cancer grading is performed by pathologists based on the morphology of the tumor on hematoxylin and eosin (H and E) slides. In this study, we investigated the histopathological image features with various survival models and attempted to study their correlations. Methods: Three texture methods (speeded-up robust features, histogram of oriented gradient, and local binary pattern) and two convolutional neural network (CNN)-based methods were applied to quantify histopathological image features. Five survival models were assessed on those image features in the context with other prostate clinical prognostic factors, including primary and secondary Gleason patterns, prostate-specific antigen levels, age, and clinical tumor stages. Results: Based on statistical comparisons among different image features with survival models, image features from CNN-based method with a recurrent neural network called CNN-long-short-term memory provided the highest hazard ratio of prostate cancer recurrence under Cox regression with an elastic net penalty. Conclusions: This approach outperformed the other image quantification methods listed above. Using this approach, patient outcomes were highly correlated with the histopathological image features of the tissue samples. In future studies, we plan to investigate the potential use of this approach for predicting recurrence in a wider range of cancer types.
topic histopathological image
image features
neural networks
prostate cancer
survival models
url http://www.jpathinformatics.org/article.asp?issn=2153-3539;year=2019;volume=10;issue=1;spage=30;epage=30;aulast=Ren
work_keys_str_mv AT jianren statisticalanalysisofsurvivalmodelsusingfeaturequantificationonprostatecancerhistopathologicalimages
AT ericasinger statisticalanalysisofsurvivalmodelsusingfeaturequantificationonprostatecancerhistopathologicalimages
AT evitasadimin statisticalanalysisofsurvivalmodelsusingfeaturequantificationonprostatecancerhistopathologicalimages
AT davidjforan statisticalanalysisofsurvivalmodelsusingfeaturequantificationonprostatecancerhistopathologicalimages
AT xinqi statisticalanalysisofsurvivalmodelsusingfeaturequantificationonprostatecancerhistopathologicalimages
_version_ 1724752134340083712