Statistical analysis of survival models using feature quantification on prostate cancer histopathological images
Background: Grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma is based on the Gleason scoring system and the more recently established prognostic grade groups. Typically, prostate cancer grading is performed by pathologists based on the morphology of the tumor on hematoxylin and eosin (H and E) slides. In this st...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Pathology Informatics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.jpathinformatics.org/article.asp?issn=2153-3539;year=2019;volume=10;issue=1;spage=30;epage=30;aulast=Ren |
id |
doaj-96be7a3821a54d7dbfbca2c957024217 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-96be7a3821a54d7dbfbca2c9570242172020-11-25T02:47:40ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pathology Informatics2153-35392153-35392019-01-01101303010.4103/jpi.jpi_85_18Statistical analysis of survival models using feature quantification on prostate cancer histopathological imagesJian RenEric A SingerEvita SadiminDavid J ForanXin QiBackground: Grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma is based on the Gleason scoring system and the more recently established prognostic grade groups. Typically, prostate cancer grading is performed by pathologists based on the morphology of the tumor on hematoxylin and eosin (H and E) slides. In this study, we investigated the histopathological image features with various survival models and attempted to study their correlations. Methods: Three texture methods (speeded-up robust features, histogram of oriented gradient, and local binary pattern) and two convolutional neural network (CNN)-based methods were applied to quantify histopathological image features. Five survival models were assessed on those image features in the context with other prostate clinical prognostic factors, including primary and secondary Gleason patterns, prostate-specific antigen levels, age, and clinical tumor stages. Results: Based on statistical comparisons among different image features with survival models, image features from CNN-based method with a recurrent neural network called CNN-long-short-term memory provided the highest hazard ratio of prostate cancer recurrence under Cox regression with an elastic net penalty. Conclusions: This approach outperformed the other image quantification methods listed above. Using this approach, patient outcomes were highly correlated with the histopathological image features of the tissue samples. In future studies, we plan to investigate the potential use of this approach for predicting recurrence in a wider range of cancer types.http://www.jpathinformatics.org/article.asp?issn=2153-3539;year=2019;volume=10;issue=1;spage=30;epage=30;aulast=Renhistopathological imageimage featuresneural networksprostate cancersurvival models |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jian Ren Eric A Singer Evita Sadimin David J Foran Xin Qi |
spellingShingle |
Jian Ren Eric A Singer Evita Sadimin David J Foran Xin Qi Statistical analysis of survival models using feature quantification on prostate cancer histopathological images Journal of Pathology Informatics histopathological image image features neural networks prostate cancer survival models |
author_facet |
Jian Ren Eric A Singer Evita Sadimin David J Foran Xin Qi |
author_sort |
Jian Ren |
title |
Statistical analysis of survival models using feature quantification on prostate cancer histopathological images |
title_short |
Statistical analysis of survival models using feature quantification on prostate cancer histopathological images |
title_full |
Statistical analysis of survival models using feature quantification on prostate cancer histopathological images |
title_fullStr |
Statistical analysis of survival models using feature quantification on prostate cancer histopathological images |
title_full_unstemmed |
Statistical analysis of survival models using feature quantification on prostate cancer histopathological images |
title_sort |
statistical analysis of survival models using feature quantification on prostate cancer histopathological images |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
series |
Journal of Pathology Informatics |
issn |
2153-3539 2153-3539 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
Background: Grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma is based on the Gleason scoring system and the more recently established prognostic grade groups. Typically, prostate cancer grading is performed by pathologists based on the morphology of the tumor on hematoxylin and eosin (H and E) slides. In this study, we investigated the histopathological image features with various survival models and attempted to study their correlations. Methods: Three texture methods (speeded-up robust features, histogram of oriented gradient, and local binary pattern) and two convolutional neural network (CNN)-based methods were applied to quantify histopathological image features. Five survival models were assessed on those image features in the context with other prostate clinical prognostic factors, including primary and secondary Gleason patterns, prostate-specific antigen levels, age, and clinical tumor stages. Results: Based on statistical comparisons among different image features with survival models, image features from CNN-based method with a recurrent neural network called CNN-long-short-term memory provided the highest hazard ratio of prostate cancer recurrence under Cox regression with an elastic net penalty. Conclusions: This approach outperformed the other image quantification methods listed above. Using this approach, patient outcomes were highly correlated with the histopathological image features of the tissue samples. In future studies, we plan to investigate the potential use of this approach for predicting recurrence in a wider range of cancer types. |
topic |
histopathological image image features neural networks prostate cancer survival models |
url |
http://www.jpathinformatics.org/article.asp?issn=2153-3539;year=2019;volume=10;issue=1;spage=30;epage=30;aulast=Ren |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jianren statisticalanalysisofsurvivalmodelsusingfeaturequantificationonprostatecancerhistopathologicalimages AT ericasinger statisticalanalysisofsurvivalmodelsusingfeaturequantificationonprostatecancerhistopathologicalimages AT evitasadimin statisticalanalysisofsurvivalmodelsusingfeaturequantificationonprostatecancerhistopathologicalimages AT davidjforan statisticalanalysisofsurvivalmodelsusingfeaturequantificationonprostatecancerhistopathologicalimages AT xinqi statisticalanalysisofsurvivalmodelsusingfeaturequantificationonprostatecancerhistopathologicalimages |
_version_ |
1724752134340083712 |