Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
Systematic reviews should build on a protocol that describes the rationale, hypothesis, and planned methods of the review; few reviews report whether a protocol exists. Detailed, well-described protocols can facilitate the understanding and appraisal of the review methods, as well as the detection o...
Main Authors: | Mireia Estarli, Eliud Salvador Aguilar Barrera, Rodrigo Martínez-Rodríguez, Eduard Baladia, Samuel Duran Agüero, Saby Camacho, Kristian Buhring, Aitor Herrero-López, Diana Maria Gil-González |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Academia Española de Nutrición y Dietética
2016-02-01
|
Series: | Revista Española de Nutrición Humana y Dietética |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://renhyd.org/index.php/renhyd/article/view/223 |
Similar Items
-
Hacia la investigación basada en la evidencia
by: María Elena Marqués, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01) -
Conflictos de interés en nutrición humana y dietética
by: Eduard Baladia, et al.
Published: (2016-06-01) -
Systematic reviews are the heart of evidence-based dietetics practice and evidence-based research
by: Eduard Baladia, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01) -
Formulación de Políticas Nutricionales informadas por la Evidencia
by: Eduard Baladia, et al.
Published: (2015-07-01) -
La declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para reportar revisiones sistemáticas
by: Agustin Ciapponi
Published: (2021-08-01)