Divergent thinking techniques discrepancy and functional creativity: Comparative study of structural and procedural techniques in architectural design
Architectural design ‘process’ is a creative process, since “to design” means “to create”. In this respect, it is significant to highlight the role of divergent thinking in creativity. Divergent thinking tackles problems from multiple perspectives and often discovers and develops original solutions....
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2018-12-01
|
Series: | Ain Shams Engineering Journal |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090447916301447 |
id |
doaj-96b58e7ce09445f489a4cf46c899c6a7 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-96b58e7ce09445f489a4cf46c899c6a72021-06-02T05:19:59ZengElsevierAin Shams Engineering Journal2090-44792018-12-019414651479Divergent thinking techniques discrepancy and functional creativity: Comparative study of structural and procedural techniques in architectural designDoaa K. Hassan0Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University, 1 El-Sarayat St. Abdo Basha Square, Abbassia, Cairo 11517, EgyptArchitectural design ‘process’ is a creative process, since “to design” means “to create”. In this respect, it is significant to highlight the role of divergent thinking in creativity. Divergent thinking tackles problems from multiple perspectives and often discovers and develops original solutions. Thus, this research aimed at investigating the difference between two divergent thinking techniques as representatives of two different approaches, the ‘structural’ and the ‘procedural’. The study methodology depended on a comparative study in terms of an educational experiment to examine the discrepancy between Lotus Blossom (structural) and Provocation (procedural). Design project as a data gathering tool was required to inspect ‘product’ functional creativity and a qualitative questionnaire was conducted in order to evaluate the interface mechanism of each technique. The study ended up with specific findings that showed the pros and cons of each technique, based on ‘descriptive statistics’. Keywords: Creative design process, Divergent thinking techniques, Lotus blossom, Provocationhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090447916301447 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Doaa K. Hassan |
spellingShingle |
Doaa K. Hassan Divergent thinking techniques discrepancy and functional creativity: Comparative study of structural and procedural techniques in architectural design Ain Shams Engineering Journal |
author_facet |
Doaa K. Hassan |
author_sort |
Doaa K. Hassan |
title |
Divergent thinking techniques discrepancy and functional creativity: Comparative study of structural and procedural techniques in architectural design |
title_short |
Divergent thinking techniques discrepancy and functional creativity: Comparative study of structural and procedural techniques in architectural design |
title_full |
Divergent thinking techniques discrepancy and functional creativity: Comparative study of structural and procedural techniques in architectural design |
title_fullStr |
Divergent thinking techniques discrepancy and functional creativity: Comparative study of structural and procedural techniques in architectural design |
title_full_unstemmed |
Divergent thinking techniques discrepancy and functional creativity: Comparative study of structural and procedural techniques in architectural design |
title_sort |
divergent thinking techniques discrepancy and functional creativity: comparative study of structural and procedural techniques in architectural design |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Ain Shams Engineering Journal |
issn |
2090-4479 |
publishDate |
2018-12-01 |
description |
Architectural design ‘process’ is a creative process, since “to design” means “to create”. In this respect, it is significant to highlight the role of divergent thinking in creativity. Divergent thinking tackles problems from multiple perspectives and often discovers and develops original solutions. Thus, this research aimed at investigating the difference between two divergent thinking techniques as representatives of two different approaches, the ‘structural’ and the ‘procedural’. The study methodology depended on a comparative study in terms of an educational experiment to examine the discrepancy between Lotus Blossom (structural) and Provocation (procedural). Design project as a data gathering tool was required to inspect ‘product’ functional creativity and a qualitative questionnaire was conducted in order to evaluate the interface mechanism of each technique. The study ended up with specific findings that showed the pros and cons of each technique, based on ‘descriptive statistics’. Keywords: Creative design process, Divergent thinking techniques, Lotus blossom, Provocation |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090447916301447 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT doaakhassan divergentthinkingtechniquesdiscrepancyandfunctionalcreativitycomparativestudyofstructuralandproceduraltechniquesinarchitecturaldesign |
_version_ |
1721408191361712128 |