POLITIK SIKLUS ANGGARAN LOKAL (STUDI APBD KOTA SURAKARTA MENJELANG PILKADA 2010)

Incumbent always has a strategic position in general election. Many literatures discuss how incumbents take advantage of his position by holding on his budgeting power to create personal popularityr. In political economic literature this phenomena is called politics budget cycle. This research trys...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: PRIYATNO HARSASTO
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Master of Political Science Program, Department of Politics and Governance, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Diponegoro University, 2015-02-01
Series:Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik
Online Access:https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/politika/article/view/8219
id doaj-96b34c97e2094b42a6f82e6ead5da306
record_format Article
spelling doaj-96b34c97e2094b42a6f82e6ead5da3062020-11-24T23:56:30ZengMaster of Political Science Program, Department of Politics and Governance, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Diponegoro University,Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik2086-73442502-776X2015-02-0151768710.14710/politika.5.1.2014.76-877056POLITIK SIKLUS ANGGARAN LOKAL (STUDI APBD KOTA SURAKARTA MENJELANG PILKADA 2010)PRIYATNO HARSASTO0Ilmu Pemerintahan, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas DiponegoroIncumbent always has a strategic position in general election. Many literatures discuss how incumbents take advantage of his position by holding on his budgeting power to create personal popularityr. In political economic literature this phenomena is called politics budget cycle. This research trys to uncover the practice of this kind of politics in Surakarta: wheater the incumbent used his budgeting power to win the local election or not?In doing so, this research used descriptive analisys which took advantage of documents as well as indepth interview. The main finding of this research is we cannot find any evidence of the use of politics budget cycle in Surakarta.Two sensitive sectors, namely social sectors did not increase dramatically before the election. When probing into some important sections of the budget, it is found that alocation for education and health services increase dramatically. However, those two sections are parts of basic services so that we cannot conclude that it has something to do with incumbent’s political ambition to retain his power. When we look into education and health programs, we found that those programs have already served the need of the people long before the election. In conclusion, there are not any clue that incumbent take advantage of his budgetary power to win his position as mayor of Surakarta.https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/politika/article/view/8219
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author PRIYATNO HARSASTO
spellingShingle PRIYATNO HARSASTO
POLITIK SIKLUS ANGGARAN LOKAL (STUDI APBD KOTA SURAKARTA MENJELANG PILKADA 2010)
Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik
author_facet PRIYATNO HARSASTO
author_sort PRIYATNO HARSASTO
title POLITIK SIKLUS ANGGARAN LOKAL (STUDI APBD KOTA SURAKARTA MENJELANG PILKADA 2010)
title_short POLITIK SIKLUS ANGGARAN LOKAL (STUDI APBD KOTA SURAKARTA MENJELANG PILKADA 2010)
title_full POLITIK SIKLUS ANGGARAN LOKAL (STUDI APBD KOTA SURAKARTA MENJELANG PILKADA 2010)
title_fullStr POLITIK SIKLUS ANGGARAN LOKAL (STUDI APBD KOTA SURAKARTA MENJELANG PILKADA 2010)
title_full_unstemmed POLITIK SIKLUS ANGGARAN LOKAL (STUDI APBD KOTA SURAKARTA MENJELANG PILKADA 2010)
title_sort politik siklus anggaran lokal (studi apbd kota surakarta menjelang pilkada 2010)
publisher Master of Political Science Program, Department of Politics and Governance, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Diponegoro University,
series Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik
issn 2086-7344
2502-776X
publishDate 2015-02-01
description Incumbent always has a strategic position in general election. Many literatures discuss how incumbents take advantage of his position by holding on his budgeting power to create personal popularityr. In political economic literature this phenomena is called politics budget cycle. This research trys to uncover the practice of this kind of politics in Surakarta: wheater the incumbent used his budgeting power to win the local election or not?In doing so, this research used descriptive analisys which took advantage of documents as well as indepth interview. The main finding of this research is we cannot find any evidence of the use of politics budget cycle in Surakarta.Two sensitive sectors, namely social sectors did not increase dramatically before the election. When probing into some important sections of the budget, it is found that alocation for education and health services increase dramatically. However, those two sections are parts of basic services so that we cannot conclude that it has something to do with incumbent’s political ambition to retain his power. When we look into education and health programs, we found that those programs have already served the need of the people long before the election. In conclusion, there are not any clue that incumbent take advantage of his budgetary power to win his position as mayor of Surakarta.
url https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/politika/article/view/8219
work_keys_str_mv AT priyatnoharsasto politiksiklusanggaranlokalstudiapbdkotasurakartamenjelangpilkada2010
_version_ 1725458245751930880