Simon`s Puzzle: Heuristics in the Process of Making Political Choices
In this article we analyse one of the most fascinating paradoxes of mass politics. Based on the data from the studies of neurobiologists, neurologists, social psychology, cognitive and evolution studies we answer the question specified in literature as the Simon’s puzzle: How is it possible that cit...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Croatian Interdisciplinary Society
2014-07-01
|
Series: | Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://indecs.eu/2014/indecs2014-pp210-224.pdf |
id |
doaj-96af761b67b34d159a1f7bb3e7191ae9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-96af761b67b34d159a1f7bb3e7191ae92020-11-24T23:44:26ZengCroatian Interdisciplinary SocietyInterdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems1334-46841334-46762014-07-0112321022410.7906/indecs.12.3.2Simon`s Puzzle: Heuristics in the Process of Making Political ChoicesMateusz Wajzer0Tymoteusz Staniucha1University of Silesia – Department of Social SciencesUniversity of Silesia – Department of Social SciencesIn this article we analyse one of the most fascinating paradoxes of mass politics. Based on the data from the studies of neurobiologists, neurologists, social psychology, cognitive and evolution studies we answer the question specified in literature as the Simon’s puzzle: How is it possible that citizens have their opinions about politics, if they know so little about it? We began our analysis from the criticism of the economic rationality approach. To do this, we referred to the Allais paradox, cognitive dissonance theory, Ellsberg paradox, the concept of bounded rationality, conjunction fallacy and prospect theory. Next, we described the evolutionary processes shaping the minds of Homo sapiens and characterised cognitive mechanisms, thanks to which people can make political choices, especially in view of the shortage of time and information. The following heuristics are referred to herein: affect, recognition, judgment and imitation.http://indecs.eu/2014/indecs2014-pp210-224.pdfSimon`s puzzleheuristicspolitical choicevoting behavioursomatic marker hypothesis |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mateusz Wajzer Tymoteusz Staniucha |
spellingShingle |
Mateusz Wajzer Tymoteusz Staniucha Simon`s Puzzle: Heuristics in the Process of Making Political Choices Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems Simon`s puzzle heuristics political choice voting behaviour somatic marker hypothesis |
author_facet |
Mateusz Wajzer Tymoteusz Staniucha |
author_sort |
Mateusz Wajzer |
title |
Simon`s Puzzle: Heuristics in the Process of Making Political Choices |
title_short |
Simon`s Puzzle: Heuristics in the Process of Making Political Choices |
title_full |
Simon`s Puzzle: Heuristics in the Process of Making Political Choices |
title_fullStr |
Simon`s Puzzle: Heuristics in the Process of Making Political Choices |
title_full_unstemmed |
Simon`s Puzzle: Heuristics in the Process of Making Political Choices |
title_sort |
simon`s puzzle: heuristics in the process of making political choices |
publisher |
Croatian Interdisciplinary Society |
series |
Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems |
issn |
1334-4684 1334-4676 |
publishDate |
2014-07-01 |
description |
In this article we analyse one of the most fascinating paradoxes of mass politics. Based on the data from the studies of neurobiologists, neurologists, social psychology, cognitive and evolution studies we answer the question specified in literature as the Simon’s puzzle: How is it possible that citizens have their opinions about politics, if they know so little about it? We began our analysis from the criticism of the economic rationality approach. To do this, we referred to the Allais paradox, cognitive dissonance theory, Ellsberg paradox, the concept of bounded rationality, conjunction fallacy and prospect theory. Next, we described the evolutionary processes shaping the minds of Homo sapiens and characterised cognitive mechanisms, thanks to which people can make political choices, especially in view of the shortage of time and information. The following heuristics are referred to herein: affect, recognition, judgment and imitation. |
topic |
Simon`s puzzle heuristics political choice voting behaviour somatic marker hypothesis |
url |
http://indecs.eu/2014/indecs2014-pp210-224.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mateuszwajzer simonspuzzleheuristicsintheprocessofmakingpoliticalchoices AT tymoteuszstaniucha simonspuzzleheuristicsintheprocessofmakingpoliticalchoices |
_version_ |
1725498473954934784 |