Simon`s Puzzle: Heuristics in the Process of Making Political Choices

In this article we analyse one of the most fascinating paradoxes of mass politics. Based on the data from the studies of neurobiologists, neurologists, social psychology, cognitive and evolution studies we answer the question specified in literature as the Simon’s puzzle: How is it possible that cit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mateusz Wajzer, Tymoteusz Staniucha
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Croatian Interdisciplinary Society 2014-07-01
Series:Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:http://indecs.eu/2014/indecs2014-pp210-224.pdf
id doaj-96af761b67b34d159a1f7bb3e7191ae9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-96af761b67b34d159a1f7bb3e7191ae92020-11-24T23:44:26ZengCroatian Interdisciplinary SocietyInterdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems1334-46841334-46762014-07-0112321022410.7906/indecs.12.3.2Simon`s Puzzle: Heuristics in the Process of Making Political ChoicesMateusz Wajzer0Tymoteusz Staniucha1University of Silesia – Department of Social SciencesUniversity of Silesia – Department of Social SciencesIn this article we analyse one of the most fascinating paradoxes of mass politics. Based on the data from the studies of neurobiologists, neurologists, social psychology, cognitive and evolution studies we answer the question specified in literature as the Simon’s puzzle: How is it possible that citizens have their opinions about politics, if they know so little about it? We began our analysis from the criticism of the economic rationality approach. To do this, we referred to the Allais paradox, cognitive dissonance theory, Ellsberg paradox, the concept of bounded rationality, conjunction fallacy and prospect theory. Next, we described the evolutionary processes shaping the minds of Homo sapiens and characterised cognitive mechanisms, thanks to which people can make political choices, especially in view of the shortage of time and information. The following heuristics are referred to herein: affect, recognition, judgment and imitation.http://indecs.eu/2014/indecs2014-pp210-224.pdfSimon`s puzzleheuristicspolitical choicevoting behavioursomatic marker hypothesis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mateusz Wajzer
Tymoteusz Staniucha
spellingShingle Mateusz Wajzer
Tymoteusz Staniucha
Simon`s Puzzle: Heuristics in the Process of Making Political Choices
Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems
Simon`s puzzle
heuristics
political choice
voting behaviour
somatic marker hypothesis
author_facet Mateusz Wajzer
Tymoteusz Staniucha
author_sort Mateusz Wajzer
title Simon`s Puzzle: Heuristics in the Process of Making Political Choices
title_short Simon`s Puzzle: Heuristics in the Process of Making Political Choices
title_full Simon`s Puzzle: Heuristics in the Process of Making Political Choices
title_fullStr Simon`s Puzzle: Heuristics in the Process of Making Political Choices
title_full_unstemmed Simon`s Puzzle: Heuristics in the Process of Making Political Choices
title_sort simon`s puzzle: heuristics in the process of making political choices
publisher Croatian Interdisciplinary Society
series Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems
issn 1334-4684
1334-4676
publishDate 2014-07-01
description In this article we analyse one of the most fascinating paradoxes of mass politics. Based on the data from the studies of neurobiologists, neurologists, social psychology, cognitive and evolution studies we answer the question specified in literature as the Simon’s puzzle: How is it possible that citizens have their opinions about politics, if they know so little about it? We began our analysis from the criticism of the economic rationality approach. To do this, we referred to the Allais paradox, cognitive dissonance theory, Ellsberg paradox, the concept of bounded rationality, conjunction fallacy and prospect theory. Next, we described the evolutionary processes shaping the minds of Homo sapiens and characterised cognitive mechanisms, thanks to which people can make political choices, especially in view of the shortage of time and information. The following heuristics are referred to herein: affect, recognition, judgment and imitation.
topic Simon`s puzzle
heuristics
political choice
voting behaviour
somatic marker hypothesis
url http://indecs.eu/2014/indecs2014-pp210-224.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mateuszwajzer simonspuzzleheuristicsintheprocessofmakingpoliticalchoices
AT tymoteuszstaniucha simonspuzzleheuristicsintheprocessofmakingpoliticalchoices
_version_ 1725498473954934784