Measuring troublesomeness of chronic pain by location

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Current measures of pain assess the relative contribution of pain in different body regions to the overall impact of pain. We developed a series of questions to measure the relative 'troublesomeness' of pain in different bo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Breen Alan, Foster Nadine, Pincus Tamar, Carnes Dawn, Parsons Suzanne, Vogel Steven, Underwood Martin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2006-04-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/7/34
id doaj-96ace5d7ca274f1aa56c1706977f22f9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-96ace5d7ca274f1aa56c1706977f22f92020-11-25T00:01:46ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742006-04-01713410.1186/1471-2474-7-34Measuring troublesomeness of chronic pain by locationBreen AlanFoster NadinePincus TamarCarnes DawnParsons SuzanneVogel StevenUnderwood Martin<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Current measures of pain assess the relative contribution of pain in different body regions to the overall impact of pain. We developed a series of questions to measure the relative 'troublesomeness' of pain in different body regions (the "troublesomeness grid"). The study aimed to determine whether the "troublesomeness grid" is an appropriate measure to assess the severity of pain in different body regions, allowing the comparative severity of pain in different body regions to be assessed.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We used data from a pilot for a population survey of pain (N = 205) and from the population survey itself (N = 2504) to assess the 'troublesomeness grid's performance. Specifically, its face and content validity using overall and item non-completion rates; its criterion related validity by exploring the relationship between troublesomeness and standard measures of pain, disability, distress and health utility for the five body regions most commonly affected by chronic pain; and its reliability and reproducibility in a test/re-test study.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The troublesomeness grid appeared to have good face validity as it had good completion rates. It also appeared to have good content validity as the percentage agreement between the grid and the pain manikin was high (over 90%). In terms of criterion related validity, troublesomeness was most strongly correlated with pain intensity and health related quality of life, but less with disability and distress. The test-retest reliability was between 80% and 90% for the majority of body regions examined.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The troublesomeness grid is well completed and appears to be an appropriate tool to assess the comparative severity of pain in different body regions.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/7/34
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Breen Alan
Foster Nadine
Pincus Tamar
Carnes Dawn
Parsons Suzanne
Vogel Steven
Underwood Martin
spellingShingle Breen Alan
Foster Nadine
Pincus Tamar
Carnes Dawn
Parsons Suzanne
Vogel Steven
Underwood Martin
Measuring troublesomeness of chronic pain by location
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
author_facet Breen Alan
Foster Nadine
Pincus Tamar
Carnes Dawn
Parsons Suzanne
Vogel Steven
Underwood Martin
author_sort Breen Alan
title Measuring troublesomeness of chronic pain by location
title_short Measuring troublesomeness of chronic pain by location
title_full Measuring troublesomeness of chronic pain by location
title_fullStr Measuring troublesomeness of chronic pain by location
title_full_unstemmed Measuring troublesomeness of chronic pain by location
title_sort measuring troublesomeness of chronic pain by location
publisher BMC
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
issn 1471-2474
publishDate 2006-04-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Current measures of pain assess the relative contribution of pain in different body regions to the overall impact of pain. We developed a series of questions to measure the relative 'troublesomeness' of pain in different body regions (the "troublesomeness grid"). The study aimed to determine whether the "troublesomeness grid" is an appropriate measure to assess the severity of pain in different body regions, allowing the comparative severity of pain in different body regions to be assessed.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We used data from a pilot for a population survey of pain (N = 205) and from the population survey itself (N = 2504) to assess the 'troublesomeness grid's performance. Specifically, its face and content validity using overall and item non-completion rates; its criterion related validity by exploring the relationship between troublesomeness and standard measures of pain, disability, distress and health utility for the five body regions most commonly affected by chronic pain; and its reliability and reproducibility in a test/re-test study.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The troublesomeness grid appeared to have good face validity as it had good completion rates. It also appeared to have good content validity as the percentage agreement between the grid and the pain manikin was high (over 90%). In terms of criterion related validity, troublesomeness was most strongly correlated with pain intensity and health related quality of life, but less with disability and distress. The test-retest reliability was between 80% and 90% for the majority of body regions examined.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The troublesomeness grid is well completed and appears to be an appropriate tool to assess the comparative severity of pain in different body regions.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/7/34
work_keys_str_mv AT breenalan measuringtroublesomenessofchronicpainbylocation
AT fosternadine measuringtroublesomenessofchronicpainbylocation
AT pincustamar measuringtroublesomenessofchronicpainbylocation
AT carnesdawn measuringtroublesomenessofchronicpainbylocation
AT parsonssuzanne measuringtroublesomenessofchronicpainbylocation
AT vogelsteven measuringtroublesomenessofchronicpainbylocation
AT underwoodmartin measuringtroublesomenessofchronicpainbylocation
_version_ 1725440451557720064