In-Office Tympanostomy Tube Placement Using Iontophoresis and Automated Tube Delivery Systems

Objectives (1) To evaluate safety, tolerability, and technical success of lidocaine iontophoresis and a tympanostomy tube placement system for adults in an office setting and (2) to meet regulatory evidence requirements for new drugs and devices. Study Design Prospective, multicenter, single arm. Se...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David M. Yen MD, Michael T. Murray MD, Robert Puchalski MD, Andrew R. Gould MD, John Ansley MD, Randall A. Ow MD, Jonathan R. Moss MD, Laura J. England PhD, Charles A. Syms MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-02-01
Series:OTO Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2473974X20903125
id doaj-96a08b6510224189a10a32c15b10d6ba
record_format Article
spelling doaj-96a08b6510224189a10a32c15b10d6ba2020-11-25T03:38:39ZengSAGE PublishingOTO Open2473-974X2020-02-01410.1177/2473974X20903125In-Office Tympanostomy Tube Placement Using Iontophoresis and Automated Tube Delivery SystemsDavid M. Yen MD0Michael T. Murray MD1Robert Puchalski MD2Andrew R. Gould MD3John Ansley MD4Randall A. Ow MD5Jonathan R. Moss MD6Laura J. England PhD7Charles A. Syms MD8Specialty Physician Associates, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, USACamino Ear, Nose & Throat Clinic, San Jose, California, USASouth Carolina ENT Allergy & Sleep Medicine, Columbia, South Carolina, USAAdvanced ENT & Allergy, Louisville, Kentucky, USACarolina Ear Nose & Throat Clinic, Orangeburg, South Carolina, USASacramento Ear, Nose and Throat, Roseville, California, USACharlotte Eye Ear Nose & Throat Associates, Matthews, North Carolina, USATusker Medical, Menlo Park, California, USAEar Medical Group, San Antonio, Texas, USAObjectives (1) To evaluate safety, tolerability, and technical success of lidocaine iontophoresis and a tympanostomy tube placement system for adults in an office setting and (2) to meet regulatory evidence requirements for new drugs and devices. Study Design Prospective, multicenter, single arm. Setting Patients were recruited in 8 community-based practices in the United States between June and September 2017. Subjects and Methods This study evaluated tympanic membrane anesthesia and tube placement in 30 adults. Anesthesia was achieved via iontophoresis of a lidocaine/epinephrine solution. Tube placement was conducted using an integrated myringotomy and tube delivery system. Tolerability of tube placement was measured using a patient-reported visual analog scale from 0 mm ( no pain ) to 100 mm ( worst possible pain ). Mean pain score was compared to a performance goal of 45 mm, where statistical superiority represents mild pain or less. Technical success and safety through 3 weeks postprocedure were evaluated. Results Twenty-nine (29/30, 96.7%) patients had tube(s) successfully placed in all indicated ears. One patient demonstrated inadequate tympanic membrane anesthesia, and no tube placement was attempted. The mean (SD) pain score of 9.4 (15.7) mm was statistically superior to the performance goal. There were no serious adverse events. Seven nonserious events were related to device, procedure, or drug: inadequate anesthesia (1), vertigo (1), and dizziness (1) at the time of procedure and ear discomfort (1), tube occlusion (2), and medial tube migration (1) postprocedure. Conclusion Lidocaine iontophoresis provides acceptable tympanic membrane anesthesia for safe, tolerable, and successful in-office tube placement using an integrated myringotomy and tube delivery system.https://doi.org/10.1177/2473974X20903125
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author David M. Yen MD
Michael T. Murray MD
Robert Puchalski MD
Andrew R. Gould MD
John Ansley MD
Randall A. Ow MD
Jonathan R. Moss MD
Laura J. England PhD
Charles A. Syms MD
spellingShingle David M. Yen MD
Michael T. Murray MD
Robert Puchalski MD
Andrew R. Gould MD
John Ansley MD
Randall A. Ow MD
Jonathan R. Moss MD
Laura J. England PhD
Charles A. Syms MD
In-Office Tympanostomy Tube Placement Using Iontophoresis and Automated Tube Delivery Systems
OTO Open
author_facet David M. Yen MD
Michael T. Murray MD
Robert Puchalski MD
Andrew R. Gould MD
John Ansley MD
Randall A. Ow MD
Jonathan R. Moss MD
Laura J. England PhD
Charles A. Syms MD
author_sort David M. Yen MD
title In-Office Tympanostomy Tube Placement Using Iontophoresis and Automated Tube Delivery Systems
title_short In-Office Tympanostomy Tube Placement Using Iontophoresis and Automated Tube Delivery Systems
title_full In-Office Tympanostomy Tube Placement Using Iontophoresis and Automated Tube Delivery Systems
title_fullStr In-Office Tympanostomy Tube Placement Using Iontophoresis and Automated Tube Delivery Systems
title_full_unstemmed In-Office Tympanostomy Tube Placement Using Iontophoresis and Automated Tube Delivery Systems
title_sort in-office tympanostomy tube placement using iontophoresis and automated tube delivery systems
publisher SAGE Publishing
series OTO Open
issn 2473-974X
publishDate 2020-02-01
description Objectives (1) To evaluate safety, tolerability, and technical success of lidocaine iontophoresis and a tympanostomy tube placement system for adults in an office setting and (2) to meet regulatory evidence requirements for new drugs and devices. Study Design Prospective, multicenter, single arm. Setting Patients were recruited in 8 community-based practices in the United States between June and September 2017. Subjects and Methods This study evaluated tympanic membrane anesthesia and tube placement in 30 adults. Anesthesia was achieved via iontophoresis of a lidocaine/epinephrine solution. Tube placement was conducted using an integrated myringotomy and tube delivery system. Tolerability of tube placement was measured using a patient-reported visual analog scale from 0 mm ( no pain ) to 100 mm ( worst possible pain ). Mean pain score was compared to a performance goal of 45 mm, where statistical superiority represents mild pain or less. Technical success and safety through 3 weeks postprocedure were evaluated. Results Twenty-nine (29/30, 96.7%) patients had tube(s) successfully placed in all indicated ears. One patient demonstrated inadequate tympanic membrane anesthesia, and no tube placement was attempted. The mean (SD) pain score of 9.4 (15.7) mm was statistically superior to the performance goal. There were no serious adverse events. Seven nonserious events were related to device, procedure, or drug: inadequate anesthesia (1), vertigo (1), and dizziness (1) at the time of procedure and ear discomfort (1), tube occlusion (2), and medial tube migration (1) postprocedure. Conclusion Lidocaine iontophoresis provides acceptable tympanic membrane anesthesia for safe, tolerable, and successful in-office tube placement using an integrated myringotomy and tube delivery system.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2473974X20903125
work_keys_str_mv AT davidmyenmd inofficetympanostomytubeplacementusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedeliverysystems
AT michaeltmurraymd inofficetympanostomytubeplacementusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedeliverysystems
AT robertpuchalskimd inofficetympanostomytubeplacementusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedeliverysystems
AT andrewrgouldmd inofficetympanostomytubeplacementusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedeliverysystems
AT johnansleymd inofficetympanostomytubeplacementusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedeliverysystems
AT randallaowmd inofficetympanostomytubeplacementusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedeliverysystems
AT jonathanrmossmd inofficetympanostomytubeplacementusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedeliverysystems
AT laurajenglandphd inofficetympanostomytubeplacementusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedeliverysystems
AT charlesasymsmd inofficetympanostomytubeplacementusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedeliverysystems
_version_ 1724541284974067712