Fractal Eaarth: Visualizing the Global Environment in the Anthropocene

This essay offers a postcolonial critique of recent environmentalist literature and exhibitions that frame the Anthropocene using the NASA Apollo mission’s Earthrise (1968) and Blue Marble (1972) photographs from space. Building on the work of Dennis Cosgrove and Donna Haraway, as well as historical...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lekan, Thomas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Duke University Press 2014-11-01
Series:Environmental Humanities
Online Access:http://environmentalhumanities.org/arch/vol5/5.10.pdf
id doaj-96736d987d7d4d3eafb048e2cefe648e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-96736d987d7d4d3eafb048e2cefe648e2020-11-25T00:59:51ZengDuke University PressEnvironmental Humanities2201-19192201-19192014-11-015171202Fractal Eaarth: Visualizing the Global Environment in the AnthropoceneLekan, ThomasThis essay offers a postcolonial critique of recent environmentalist literature and exhibitions that frame the Anthropocene using the NASA Apollo mission’s Earthrise (1968) and Blue Marble (1972) photographs from space. Building on the work of Dennis Cosgrove and Donna Haraway, as well as historical evidence from the U.N. Environmental Summit in Stockholm in 1972, the essay explores how the attempt to depict Anthropos as a unitary geophysical agent resurrects the appeal to the Whole Earth environmentalism of the 1970s without attending to the U.S. imperialist and racist connotations of the disembodied “god trick” found in these extraterrestrial photographs. As evidenced already in the 1950s at the landmark Man and Nature conference at Princeton and in the wildlife documentaries of Bernhard and Michael Grzimek, moreover, the first decades of the Great Acceleration witnessed the growing use of aerial images to chart the “disappearance of the outside” and to advocate for wilderness areas in the Global South as a “cultural heritage of mankind.” The confluence of geophysical tipping points, universalist history, and political struggle over decolonization resulted in eco-images that subsumed all parts of the globe—most especially Africa—into a doomsday narrative of human profligacy that lost sight of a kaleidoscopic patchwork of cultural landscapes. Fractal topographies, by contrast, serve as more effective indices of the recursive layering found in digital representations such as Google Earth and help us to stretch our historical imagination and cultural criticism into scale-dependent and multi-agentic realms that lie beyond the Apollonian visions of the late Holocene.http://environmentalhumanities.org/arch/vol5/5.10.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lekan, Thomas
spellingShingle Lekan, Thomas
Fractal Eaarth: Visualizing the Global Environment in the Anthropocene
Environmental Humanities
author_facet Lekan, Thomas
author_sort Lekan, Thomas
title Fractal Eaarth: Visualizing the Global Environment in the Anthropocene
title_short Fractal Eaarth: Visualizing the Global Environment in the Anthropocene
title_full Fractal Eaarth: Visualizing the Global Environment in the Anthropocene
title_fullStr Fractal Eaarth: Visualizing the Global Environment in the Anthropocene
title_full_unstemmed Fractal Eaarth: Visualizing the Global Environment in the Anthropocene
title_sort fractal eaarth: visualizing the global environment in the anthropocene
publisher Duke University Press
series Environmental Humanities
issn 2201-1919
2201-1919
publishDate 2014-11-01
description This essay offers a postcolonial critique of recent environmentalist literature and exhibitions that frame the Anthropocene using the NASA Apollo mission’s Earthrise (1968) and Blue Marble (1972) photographs from space. Building on the work of Dennis Cosgrove and Donna Haraway, as well as historical evidence from the U.N. Environmental Summit in Stockholm in 1972, the essay explores how the attempt to depict Anthropos as a unitary geophysical agent resurrects the appeal to the Whole Earth environmentalism of the 1970s without attending to the U.S. imperialist and racist connotations of the disembodied “god trick” found in these extraterrestrial photographs. As evidenced already in the 1950s at the landmark Man and Nature conference at Princeton and in the wildlife documentaries of Bernhard and Michael Grzimek, moreover, the first decades of the Great Acceleration witnessed the growing use of aerial images to chart the “disappearance of the outside” and to advocate for wilderness areas in the Global South as a “cultural heritage of mankind.” The confluence of geophysical tipping points, universalist history, and political struggle over decolonization resulted in eco-images that subsumed all parts of the globe—most especially Africa—into a doomsday narrative of human profligacy that lost sight of a kaleidoscopic patchwork of cultural landscapes. Fractal topographies, by contrast, serve as more effective indices of the recursive layering found in digital representations such as Google Earth and help us to stretch our historical imagination and cultural criticism into scale-dependent and multi-agentic realms that lie beyond the Apollonian visions of the late Holocene.
url http://environmentalhumanities.org/arch/vol5/5.10.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT lekanthomas fractaleaarthvisualizingtheglobalenvironmentintheanthropocene
_version_ 1725215675069235200