Co-Precipitation, Strength and Electrical Resistivity of Cu–26 wt % Ag–0.1 wt % Fe Alloy
Both a Cu–26 wt % Ag (Fe-free) alloy and Cu–26 wt % Ag–0.1 wt % Fe (Fe-doping) alloy were subjected to different heat treatments. We studied the precipitation kinetics of Ag and Cu, microstructure evolution, magnetization, hardness, strength, and electrical resistivity of the two alloys. Fe addition...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2017-12-01
|
Series: | Materials |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/10/12/1383 |
id |
doaj-96729488c5a44323bedb9f22dbcfdd78 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-96729488c5a44323bedb9f22dbcfdd782020-11-24T21:24:57ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442017-12-011012138310.3390/ma10121383ma10121383Co-Precipitation, Strength and Electrical Resistivity of Cu–26 wt % Ag–0.1 wt % Fe AlloyRui Li0Engang Wang1Xiaowei Zuo2Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Processing of Materials (Ministry of Education), Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, ChinaKey Laboratory of Electromagnetic Processing of Materials (Ministry of Education), Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, ChinaKey Laboratory of Electromagnetic Processing of Materials (Ministry of Education), Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, ChinaBoth a Cu–26 wt % Ag (Fe-free) alloy and Cu–26 wt % Ag–0.1 wt % Fe (Fe-doping) alloy were subjected to different heat treatments. We studied the precipitation kinetics of Ag and Cu, microstructure evolution, magnetization, hardness, strength, and electrical resistivity of the two alloys. Fe addition was incapable of changing the precipitation kinetics of Ag and Cu; however, it decreased the size and spacing of rod-shaped Ag precipitates within a Cu matrix, because Fe might affect the elastic strain field and diffusion field, suppressing the nucleation of Ag precipitates. Magnetization curves showed that γ-Fe precipitates were precipitated out of the Cu matrix, along with Ag precipitates in Fe-doping alloy after heat treatments. The yield strength of the Fe-doping alloy was higher than that of the Fe-free alloy, and the maximum increment was about 41.3%. The electrical conductivity in the aged Fe-doping alloy was up to about 67% IACS (International Annealed Copper Standard). Hardness, strength, and electrical resistivity were intensively discussed, based on the microstructural characterization and solute contributions of both alloys. Our results demonstrated that an increasing fraction of nanoscale γ-Fe precipitates and decreasing spacing between Ag precipitates resulted in the increasing strength of the Fe-doping alloy.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/10/12/1383Cu–Ag alloyFe additionco-precipitationprecipitation kineticshardnesselectrical resistivity |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Rui Li Engang Wang Xiaowei Zuo |
spellingShingle |
Rui Li Engang Wang Xiaowei Zuo Co-Precipitation, Strength and Electrical Resistivity of Cu–26 wt % Ag–0.1 wt % Fe Alloy Materials Cu–Ag alloy Fe addition co-precipitation precipitation kinetics hardness electrical resistivity |
author_facet |
Rui Li Engang Wang Xiaowei Zuo |
author_sort |
Rui Li |
title |
Co-Precipitation, Strength and Electrical Resistivity of Cu–26 wt % Ag–0.1 wt % Fe Alloy |
title_short |
Co-Precipitation, Strength and Electrical Resistivity of Cu–26 wt % Ag–0.1 wt % Fe Alloy |
title_full |
Co-Precipitation, Strength and Electrical Resistivity of Cu–26 wt % Ag–0.1 wt % Fe Alloy |
title_fullStr |
Co-Precipitation, Strength and Electrical Resistivity of Cu–26 wt % Ag–0.1 wt % Fe Alloy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Co-Precipitation, Strength and Electrical Resistivity of Cu–26 wt % Ag–0.1 wt % Fe Alloy |
title_sort |
co-precipitation, strength and electrical resistivity of cu–26 wt % ag–0.1 wt % fe alloy |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Materials |
issn |
1996-1944 |
publishDate |
2017-12-01 |
description |
Both a Cu–26 wt % Ag (Fe-free) alloy and Cu–26 wt % Ag–0.1 wt % Fe (Fe-doping) alloy were subjected to different heat treatments. We studied the precipitation kinetics of Ag and Cu, microstructure evolution, magnetization, hardness, strength, and electrical resistivity of the two alloys. Fe addition was incapable of changing the precipitation kinetics of Ag and Cu; however, it decreased the size and spacing of rod-shaped Ag precipitates within a Cu matrix, because Fe might affect the elastic strain field and diffusion field, suppressing the nucleation of Ag precipitates. Magnetization curves showed that γ-Fe precipitates were precipitated out of the Cu matrix, along with Ag precipitates in Fe-doping alloy after heat treatments. The yield strength of the Fe-doping alloy was higher than that of the Fe-free alloy, and the maximum increment was about 41.3%. The electrical conductivity in the aged Fe-doping alloy was up to about 67% IACS (International Annealed Copper Standard). Hardness, strength, and electrical resistivity were intensively discussed, based on the microstructural characterization and solute contributions of both alloys. Our results demonstrated that an increasing fraction of nanoscale γ-Fe precipitates and decreasing spacing between Ag precipitates resulted in the increasing strength of the Fe-doping alloy. |
topic |
Cu–Ag alloy Fe addition co-precipitation precipitation kinetics hardness electrical resistivity |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/10/12/1383 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ruili coprecipitationstrengthandelectricalresistivityofcu26wtag01wtfealloy AT engangwang coprecipitationstrengthandelectricalresistivityofcu26wtag01wtfealloy AT xiaoweizuo coprecipitationstrengthandelectricalresistivityofcu26wtag01wtfealloy |
_version_ |
1725985917476274176 |