Co-Precipitation, Strength and Electrical Resistivity of Cu–26 wt % Ag–0.1 wt % Fe Alloy

Both a Cu–26 wt % Ag (Fe-free) alloy and Cu–26 wt % Ag–0.1 wt % Fe (Fe-doping) alloy were subjected to different heat treatments. We studied the precipitation kinetics of Ag and Cu, microstructure evolution, magnetization, hardness, strength, and electrical resistivity of the two alloys. Fe addition...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rui Li, Engang Wang, Xiaowei Zuo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-12-01
Series:Materials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/10/12/1383
id doaj-96729488c5a44323bedb9f22dbcfdd78
record_format Article
spelling doaj-96729488c5a44323bedb9f22dbcfdd782020-11-24T21:24:57ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442017-12-011012138310.3390/ma10121383ma10121383Co-Precipitation, Strength and Electrical Resistivity of Cu–26 wt % Ag–0.1 wt % Fe AlloyRui Li0Engang Wang1Xiaowei Zuo2Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Processing of Materials (Ministry of Education), Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, ChinaKey Laboratory of Electromagnetic Processing of Materials (Ministry of Education), Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, ChinaKey Laboratory of Electromagnetic Processing of Materials (Ministry of Education), Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, ChinaBoth a Cu–26 wt % Ag (Fe-free) alloy and Cu–26 wt % Ag–0.1 wt % Fe (Fe-doping) alloy were subjected to different heat treatments. We studied the precipitation kinetics of Ag and Cu, microstructure evolution, magnetization, hardness, strength, and electrical resistivity of the two alloys. Fe addition was incapable of changing the precipitation kinetics of Ag and Cu; however, it decreased the size and spacing of rod-shaped Ag precipitates within a Cu matrix, because Fe might affect the elastic strain field and diffusion field, suppressing the nucleation of Ag precipitates. Magnetization curves showed that γ-Fe precipitates were precipitated out of the Cu matrix, along with Ag precipitates in Fe-doping alloy after heat treatments. The yield strength of the Fe-doping alloy was higher than that of the Fe-free alloy, and the maximum increment was about 41.3%. The electrical conductivity in the aged Fe-doping alloy was up to about 67% IACS (International Annealed Copper Standard). Hardness, strength, and electrical resistivity were intensively discussed, based on the microstructural characterization and solute contributions of both alloys. Our results demonstrated that an increasing fraction of nanoscale γ-Fe precipitates and decreasing spacing between Ag precipitates resulted in the increasing strength of the Fe-doping alloy.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/10/12/1383Cu–Ag alloyFe additionco-precipitationprecipitation kineticshardnesselectrical resistivity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rui Li
Engang Wang
Xiaowei Zuo
spellingShingle Rui Li
Engang Wang
Xiaowei Zuo
Co-Precipitation, Strength and Electrical Resistivity of Cu–26 wt % Ag–0.1 wt % Fe Alloy
Materials
Cu–Ag alloy
Fe addition
co-precipitation
precipitation kinetics
hardness
electrical resistivity
author_facet Rui Li
Engang Wang
Xiaowei Zuo
author_sort Rui Li
title Co-Precipitation, Strength and Electrical Resistivity of Cu–26 wt % Ag–0.1 wt % Fe Alloy
title_short Co-Precipitation, Strength and Electrical Resistivity of Cu–26 wt % Ag–0.1 wt % Fe Alloy
title_full Co-Precipitation, Strength and Electrical Resistivity of Cu–26 wt % Ag–0.1 wt % Fe Alloy
title_fullStr Co-Precipitation, Strength and Electrical Resistivity of Cu–26 wt % Ag–0.1 wt % Fe Alloy
title_full_unstemmed Co-Precipitation, Strength and Electrical Resistivity of Cu–26 wt % Ag–0.1 wt % Fe Alloy
title_sort co-precipitation, strength and electrical resistivity of cu–26 wt % ag–0.1 wt % fe alloy
publisher MDPI AG
series Materials
issn 1996-1944
publishDate 2017-12-01
description Both a Cu–26 wt % Ag (Fe-free) alloy and Cu–26 wt % Ag–0.1 wt % Fe (Fe-doping) alloy were subjected to different heat treatments. We studied the precipitation kinetics of Ag and Cu, microstructure evolution, magnetization, hardness, strength, and electrical resistivity of the two alloys. Fe addition was incapable of changing the precipitation kinetics of Ag and Cu; however, it decreased the size and spacing of rod-shaped Ag precipitates within a Cu matrix, because Fe might affect the elastic strain field and diffusion field, suppressing the nucleation of Ag precipitates. Magnetization curves showed that γ-Fe precipitates were precipitated out of the Cu matrix, along with Ag precipitates in Fe-doping alloy after heat treatments. The yield strength of the Fe-doping alloy was higher than that of the Fe-free alloy, and the maximum increment was about 41.3%. The electrical conductivity in the aged Fe-doping alloy was up to about 67% IACS (International Annealed Copper Standard). Hardness, strength, and electrical resistivity were intensively discussed, based on the microstructural characterization and solute contributions of both alloys. Our results demonstrated that an increasing fraction of nanoscale γ-Fe precipitates and decreasing spacing between Ag precipitates resulted in the increasing strength of the Fe-doping alloy.
topic Cu–Ag alloy
Fe addition
co-precipitation
precipitation kinetics
hardness
electrical resistivity
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/10/12/1383
work_keys_str_mv AT ruili coprecipitationstrengthandelectricalresistivityofcu26wtag01wtfealloy
AT engangwang coprecipitationstrengthandelectricalresistivityofcu26wtag01wtfealloy
AT xiaoweizuo coprecipitationstrengthandelectricalresistivityofcu26wtag01wtfealloy
_version_ 1725985917476274176