Understanding and Acceptance of Smart City Policies: Practitioners’ Perspectives on the Malaysian Smart City Framework

Whilst a plethora of research exists on the smart cities and project performance evaluations, only few studies have focused on the smart city policy evaluation from the perspective of its acceptance by practitioners. This paper aims to generate insights by evaluating the smart city policy through a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seng Boon Lim, Jalaluddin Abdul Malek, Md Farabi Yussoff Md Yussoff, Tan Yigitcanlar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-08-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9559
id doaj-966b3861d2a642a6bd9b02c0df563777
record_format Article
spelling doaj-966b3861d2a642a6bd9b02c0df5637772021-09-09T13:57:28ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502021-08-01139559955910.3390/su13179559Understanding and Acceptance of Smart City Policies: Practitioners’ Perspectives on the Malaysian Smart City FrameworkSeng Boon Lim0Jalaluddin Abdul Malek1Md Farabi Yussoff Md Yussoff2Tan Yigitcanlar3Center for Research in Development, Social and Environment (SEEDS), Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, MalaysiaCenter for Research in Development, Social and Environment (SEEDS), Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, MalaysiaFederal Government Administrative Centre, Federal Department of Town and Country Planning, Ministry of Housing and Local Government, Putrajaya 62675, MalaysiaSchool of Architecture and Built Environment, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, AustraliaWhilst a plethora of research exists on the smart cities and project performance evaluations, only few studies have focused on the smart city policy evaluation from the perspective of its acceptance by practitioners. This paper aims to generate insights by evaluating the smart city policy through a developing country case study—i.e., Malaysia. This study employed a questionnaire survey method for data collection and analyzed the data by using Fuzzy Delphi analysis. A group of 40 practitioners was gathered in a focus group discussion through purposive sampling. The main objectives of this survey were to identify the understanding and acceptance levels of the seven smart city domains and respective strategies that are outlined in the Malaysian Smart City Framework. The results disclosed that the practitioners possessed divergent levels of understanding and acceptance in terms of smart city domains. The study participant practitioners accepted all understanding and acceptance objectives of smart economy, living, people, and governance domains (expert agreement 75–92% and threshold <i>d</i> value 0.123–0.188), but rejected all objectives for both smart environment and digital infrastructure domains (expert agreement 55–74% and threshold <i>d</i> value 0.150–0.212). Along with this, acceptance of smart mobility was also rejected (expert agreement 56% and threshold <i>d</i> value 0.245). The findings reveal that considering all opinions expressing dissensus is essential when building more inclusive smart city strategies. This study contributes to the smart city discourse as being one of the first in capturing professional practitioners’ understanding and acceptance on a national level smart city policy by applying the Delphi method in the smart city context. Most importantly, the study informs urban policymakers on how to capture the voices and perspectives of the general public on national and local smart city strategy and initiatives.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9559EuropeFuzzy Delphi methodHong KongIndiaMalaysiasmart cities
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Seng Boon Lim
Jalaluddin Abdul Malek
Md Farabi Yussoff Md Yussoff
Tan Yigitcanlar
spellingShingle Seng Boon Lim
Jalaluddin Abdul Malek
Md Farabi Yussoff Md Yussoff
Tan Yigitcanlar
Understanding and Acceptance of Smart City Policies: Practitioners’ Perspectives on the Malaysian Smart City Framework
Sustainability
Europe
Fuzzy Delphi method
Hong Kong
India
Malaysia
smart cities
author_facet Seng Boon Lim
Jalaluddin Abdul Malek
Md Farabi Yussoff Md Yussoff
Tan Yigitcanlar
author_sort Seng Boon Lim
title Understanding and Acceptance of Smart City Policies: Practitioners’ Perspectives on the Malaysian Smart City Framework
title_short Understanding and Acceptance of Smart City Policies: Practitioners’ Perspectives on the Malaysian Smart City Framework
title_full Understanding and Acceptance of Smart City Policies: Practitioners’ Perspectives on the Malaysian Smart City Framework
title_fullStr Understanding and Acceptance of Smart City Policies: Practitioners’ Perspectives on the Malaysian Smart City Framework
title_full_unstemmed Understanding and Acceptance of Smart City Policies: Practitioners’ Perspectives on the Malaysian Smart City Framework
title_sort understanding and acceptance of smart city policies: practitioners’ perspectives on the malaysian smart city framework
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Whilst a plethora of research exists on the smart cities and project performance evaluations, only few studies have focused on the smart city policy evaluation from the perspective of its acceptance by practitioners. This paper aims to generate insights by evaluating the smart city policy through a developing country case study—i.e., Malaysia. This study employed a questionnaire survey method for data collection and analyzed the data by using Fuzzy Delphi analysis. A group of 40 practitioners was gathered in a focus group discussion through purposive sampling. The main objectives of this survey were to identify the understanding and acceptance levels of the seven smart city domains and respective strategies that are outlined in the Malaysian Smart City Framework. The results disclosed that the practitioners possessed divergent levels of understanding and acceptance in terms of smart city domains. The study participant practitioners accepted all understanding and acceptance objectives of smart economy, living, people, and governance domains (expert agreement 75–92% and threshold <i>d</i> value 0.123–0.188), but rejected all objectives for both smart environment and digital infrastructure domains (expert agreement 55–74% and threshold <i>d</i> value 0.150–0.212). Along with this, acceptance of smart mobility was also rejected (expert agreement 56% and threshold <i>d</i> value 0.245). The findings reveal that considering all opinions expressing dissensus is essential when building more inclusive smart city strategies. This study contributes to the smart city discourse as being one of the first in capturing professional practitioners’ understanding and acceptance on a national level smart city policy by applying the Delphi method in the smart city context. Most importantly, the study informs urban policymakers on how to capture the voices and perspectives of the general public on national and local smart city strategy and initiatives.
topic Europe
Fuzzy Delphi method
Hong Kong
India
Malaysia
smart cities
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9559
work_keys_str_mv AT sengboonlim understandingandacceptanceofsmartcitypoliciespractitionersperspectivesonthemalaysiansmartcityframework
AT jalaluddinabdulmalek understandingandacceptanceofsmartcitypoliciespractitionersperspectivesonthemalaysiansmartcityframework
AT mdfarabiyussoffmdyussoff understandingandacceptanceofsmartcitypoliciespractitionersperspectivesonthemalaysiansmartcityframework
AT tanyigitcanlar understandingandacceptanceofsmartcitypoliciespractitionersperspectivesonthemalaysiansmartcityframework
_version_ 1717759316084129792