Comparative study comparing endoscopic thyroidectomy using the axillary approach and open thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Endoscopic thyroidectomy has been applied prudently to malignant thyroid tumors. The purpose of our study was to compare the surgical outcomes of endoscopic thyroidectomy (ET) and conventional open thyroidectomy (COT) for micropapill...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lee Hayemin, Lee Jina, Sung Ki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-12-01
Series:World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.wjso.com/content/10/1/269
id doaj-9664f5b5330d4f9abf88c14910f94329
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9664f5b5330d4f9abf88c14910f943292020-11-24T21:45:56ZengBMCWorld Journal of Surgical Oncology1477-78192012-12-0110126910.1186/1477-7819-10-269Comparative study comparing endoscopic thyroidectomy using the axillary approach and open thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid microcarcinomaLee HayeminLee JinaSung Ki<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Endoscopic thyroidectomy has been applied prudently to malignant thyroid tumors. The purpose of our study was to compare the surgical outcomes of endoscopic thyroidectomy (ET) and conventional open thyroidectomy (COT) for micropapillary thyroid carcinoma.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>From October 2002 to December 2008, 78 patients underwent unilateral lobectomy and isthmectomy with central lymph node dissection for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Of these, 37 patients underwent ET and 41patients COT. Surgical outcomes, including operation time, number of retrieved lymph nodes, postoperative complication rate and patients’ satisfaction with the cosmetic results, were analyzed.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The mean age of the patients was 42.3 ± 7.6 years in the ET group and 49.0 ± 10.8 years in the OT group (<it>P</it> = 0.003). The operation time was shorter in the COT group (112.3 ± 14min) than in the ET group (138.4 ± 36.9 min, <it>P</it>< 0.01). However, there were no significant differences in tumor size (0.5 ± 0.231vs. 0.41 ± 0.264cm, <it>P</it> = 0.116), number of retrieved lymph nodes (3.63 ± 2.1vs. 3.82 ± 3.28, <it>P</it> = 0.78) or postoperative hospital stay (3.35 ± 0.94vs. 3.17 ± 1.16 days, <it>P</it> = 0.457). Patients in the ET group experienced more pain than those in the COT group at 1 and 7 days after the operation as evaluated by a visual analog scale (<it>P</it> = 0.037, 0.026). Cosmetically, patients in the ET group were very satisfied with the operative procedure according to the questionnaire we used (1.43 ± 0.55vs. 3.21 ± 0.72, <it>P</it>< 0.001). The mean follow-up period was 54.3 months in the ET group and 47.4 months in the COT group, and each group exhibited one case of tumor recurrence detected at the other thyroid lobe within 2 years.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Large series of prospective studies and long-term follow-up are needed, but the results of ET using the axillary approach for micropapillary thyroid carcinoma were not inferiortothose using COT, and it might be a safe and feasible procedure with good cosmetic results.</p> http://www.wjso.com/content/10/1/269Endoscopic thyroidectomyConventional open thyroidectomyMicropapillary thyroid carcinoma
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lee Hayemin
Lee Jina
Sung Ki
spellingShingle Lee Hayemin
Lee Jina
Sung Ki
Comparative study comparing endoscopic thyroidectomy using the axillary approach and open thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Endoscopic thyroidectomy
Conventional open thyroidectomy
Micropapillary thyroid carcinoma
author_facet Lee Hayemin
Lee Jina
Sung Ki
author_sort Lee Hayemin
title Comparative study comparing endoscopic thyroidectomy using the axillary approach and open thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma
title_short Comparative study comparing endoscopic thyroidectomy using the axillary approach and open thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma
title_full Comparative study comparing endoscopic thyroidectomy using the axillary approach and open thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma
title_fullStr Comparative study comparing endoscopic thyroidectomy using the axillary approach and open thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study comparing endoscopic thyroidectomy using the axillary approach and open thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma
title_sort comparative study comparing endoscopic thyroidectomy using the axillary approach and open thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma
publisher BMC
series World Journal of Surgical Oncology
issn 1477-7819
publishDate 2012-12-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Endoscopic thyroidectomy has been applied prudently to malignant thyroid tumors. The purpose of our study was to compare the surgical outcomes of endoscopic thyroidectomy (ET) and conventional open thyroidectomy (COT) for micropapillary thyroid carcinoma.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>From October 2002 to December 2008, 78 patients underwent unilateral lobectomy and isthmectomy with central lymph node dissection for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Of these, 37 patients underwent ET and 41patients COT. Surgical outcomes, including operation time, number of retrieved lymph nodes, postoperative complication rate and patients’ satisfaction with the cosmetic results, were analyzed.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The mean age of the patients was 42.3 ± 7.6 years in the ET group and 49.0 ± 10.8 years in the OT group (<it>P</it> = 0.003). The operation time was shorter in the COT group (112.3 ± 14min) than in the ET group (138.4 ± 36.9 min, <it>P</it>< 0.01). However, there were no significant differences in tumor size (0.5 ± 0.231vs. 0.41 ± 0.264cm, <it>P</it> = 0.116), number of retrieved lymph nodes (3.63 ± 2.1vs. 3.82 ± 3.28, <it>P</it> = 0.78) or postoperative hospital stay (3.35 ± 0.94vs. 3.17 ± 1.16 days, <it>P</it> = 0.457). Patients in the ET group experienced more pain than those in the COT group at 1 and 7 days after the operation as evaluated by a visual analog scale (<it>P</it> = 0.037, 0.026). Cosmetically, patients in the ET group were very satisfied with the operative procedure according to the questionnaire we used (1.43 ± 0.55vs. 3.21 ± 0.72, <it>P</it>< 0.001). The mean follow-up period was 54.3 months in the ET group and 47.4 months in the COT group, and each group exhibited one case of tumor recurrence detected at the other thyroid lobe within 2 years.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Large series of prospective studies and long-term follow-up are needed, but the results of ET using the axillary approach for micropapillary thyroid carcinoma were not inferiortothose using COT, and it might be a safe and feasible procedure with good cosmetic results.</p>
topic Endoscopic thyroidectomy
Conventional open thyroidectomy
Micropapillary thyroid carcinoma
url http://www.wjso.com/content/10/1/269
work_keys_str_mv AT leehayemin comparativestudycomparingendoscopicthyroidectomyusingtheaxillaryapproachandopenthyroidectomyforpapillarythyroidmicrocarcinoma
AT leejina comparativestudycomparingendoscopicthyroidectomyusingtheaxillaryapproachandopenthyroidectomyforpapillarythyroidmicrocarcinoma
AT sungki comparativestudycomparingendoscopicthyroidectomyusingtheaxillaryapproachandopenthyroidectomyforpapillarythyroidmicrocarcinoma
_version_ 1725903192352358400