Male vs Female in the mirror of Russian Dual Christian Naming (16th–17th Centuries)

The paper deals with the special features of Russian dual Christian naming—that is, the practice of giving a lay person an additional Christian name, other than his/her baptismal name. In the Middle Ages in Russia, a man could not under any circumstances get a female anthroponym as a second Christia...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anna F. Litvina, Fjodor B. Uspenskij
Format: Article
Language:Bulgarian
Published: Moscow State University of Education 2019-08-01
Series:Slovene
Subjects:
Online Access:http://slovene.ru/ojs/index.php/slovene/article/view/444
id doaj-965d2fccf64c4b72b8f22cc46fd37deb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-965d2fccf64c4b72b8f22cc46fd37deb2020-12-20T17:59:05ZbulMoscow State University of EducationSlovene2304-07852305-67542019-08-0181133161247Male vs Female in the mirror of Russian Dual Christian Naming (16th–17th Centuries)Anna F. Litvina0Fjodor B. Uspenskij1Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», Москва, 105066, Старая Басманная ул., 21/4Институт славяноведения РАН, Москва, 119991, Ленинский проспект., 32АThe paper deals with the special features of Russian dual Christian naming—that is, the practice of giving a lay person an additional Christian name, other than his/her baptismal name. In the Middle Ages in Russia, a man could not under any circumstances get a female anthroponym as a second Christian name, and a woman, respectively, could not get a male anthroponym. In particular, no variations with respect to the calendar tradition, which transform male names into female names and vice versa, were allowed. This markedly contraposes the choice of the second Christian name for a lay woman to the choice of the monastic name for a nun. The work examines a number of incidents that would seem to violate this rigor of the gender distribution of anthroponyms, and discusses a number of related problems associated with the multiplicity of personal names in pre-Petrine Rus’.   DOI: 10.31168/2305-6754.2019.8.1.5http://slovene.ru/ojs/index.php/slovene/article/view/444историческая ономастикасредневековая русьмногоименностьмесяцесловная традицияимянаречение в допетровской русикульт святыхсветская христианская двуименностьличные небесные покровители
collection DOAJ
language Bulgarian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anna F. Litvina
Fjodor B. Uspenskij
spellingShingle Anna F. Litvina
Fjodor B. Uspenskij
Male vs Female in the mirror of Russian Dual Christian Naming (16th–17th Centuries)
Slovene
историческая ономастика
средневековая русь
многоименность
месяцесловная традиция
имянаречение в допетровской руси
культ святых
светская христианская двуименность
личные небесные покровители
author_facet Anna F. Litvina
Fjodor B. Uspenskij
author_sort Anna F. Litvina
title Male vs Female in the mirror of Russian Dual Christian Naming (16th–17th Centuries)
title_short Male vs Female in the mirror of Russian Dual Christian Naming (16th–17th Centuries)
title_full Male vs Female in the mirror of Russian Dual Christian Naming (16th–17th Centuries)
title_fullStr Male vs Female in the mirror of Russian Dual Christian Naming (16th–17th Centuries)
title_full_unstemmed Male vs Female in the mirror of Russian Dual Christian Naming (16th–17th Centuries)
title_sort male vs female in the mirror of russian dual christian naming (16th–17th centuries)
publisher Moscow State University of Education
series Slovene
issn 2304-0785
2305-6754
publishDate 2019-08-01
description The paper deals with the special features of Russian dual Christian naming—that is, the practice of giving a lay person an additional Christian name, other than his/her baptismal name. In the Middle Ages in Russia, a man could not under any circumstances get a female anthroponym as a second Christian name, and a woman, respectively, could not get a male anthroponym. In particular, no variations with respect to the calendar tradition, which transform male names into female names and vice versa, were allowed. This markedly contraposes the choice of the second Christian name for a lay woman to the choice of the monastic name for a nun. The work examines a number of incidents that would seem to violate this rigor of the gender distribution of anthroponyms, and discusses a number of related problems associated with the multiplicity of personal names in pre-Petrine Rus’.   DOI: 10.31168/2305-6754.2019.8.1.5
topic историческая ономастика
средневековая русь
многоименность
месяцесловная традиция
имянаречение в допетровской руси
культ святых
светская христианская двуименность
личные небесные покровители
url http://slovene.ru/ojs/index.php/slovene/article/view/444
work_keys_str_mv AT annaflitvina malevsfemaleinthemirrorofrussiandualchristiannaming16th17thcenturies
AT fjodorbuspenskij malevsfemaleinthemirrorofrussiandualchristiannaming16th17thcenturies
_version_ 1724376182970908672