Male vs Female in the mirror of Russian Dual Christian Naming (16th–17th Centuries)
The paper deals with the special features of Russian dual Christian naming—that is, the practice of giving a lay person an additional Christian name, other than his/her baptismal name. In the Middle Ages in Russia, a man could not under any circumstances get a female anthroponym as a second Christia...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Bulgarian |
Published: |
Moscow State University of Education
2019-08-01
|
Series: | Slovene |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://slovene.ru/ojs/index.php/slovene/article/view/444 |
id |
doaj-965d2fccf64c4b72b8f22cc46fd37deb |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-965d2fccf64c4b72b8f22cc46fd37deb2020-12-20T17:59:05ZbulMoscow State University of EducationSlovene2304-07852305-67542019-08-0181133161247Male vs Female in the mirror of Russian Dual Christian Naming (16th–17th Centuries)Anna F. Litvina0Fjodor B. Uspenskij1Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», Москва, 105066, Старая Басманная ул., 21/4Институт славяноведения РАН, Москва, 119991, Ленинский проспект., 32АThe paper deals with the special features of Russian dual Christian naming—that is, the practice of giving a lay person an additional Christian name, other than his/her baptismal name. In the Middle Ages in Russia, a man could not under any circumstances get a female anthroponym as a second Christian name, and a woman, respectively, could not get a male anthroponym. In particular, no variations with respect to the calendar tradition, which transform male names into female names and vice versa, were allowed. This markedly contraposes the choice of the second Christian name for a lay woman to the choice of the monastic name for a nun. The work examines a number of incidents that would seem to violate this rigor of the gender distribution of anthroponyms, and discusses a number of related problems associated with the multiplicity of personal names in pre-Petrine Rus’. DOI: 10.31168/2305-6754.2019.8.1.5http://slovene.ru/ojs/index.php/slovene/article/view/444историческая ономастикасредневековая русьмногоименностьмесяцесловная традицияимянаречение в допетровской русикульт святыхсветская христианская двуименностьличные небесные покровители |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Bulgarian |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Anna F. Litvina Fjodor B. Uspenskij |
spellingShingle |
Anna F. Litvina Fjodor B. Uspenskij Male vs Female in the mirror of Russian Dual Christian Naming (16th–17th Centuries) Slovene историческая ономастика средневековая русь многоименность месяцесловная традиция имянаречение в допетровской руси культ святых светская христианская двуименность личные небесные покровители |
author_facet |
Anna F. Litvina Fjodor B. Uspenskij |
author_sort |
Anna F. Litvina |
title |
Male vs Female in the mirror of Russian Dual Christian Naming (16th–17th Centuries) |
title_short |
Male vs Female in the mirror of Russian Dual Christian Naming (16th–17th Centuries) |
title_full |
Male vs Female in the mirror of Russian Dual Christian Naming (16th–17th Centuries) |
title_fullStr |
Male vs Female in the mirror of Russian Dual Christian Naming (16th–17th Centuries) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Male vs Female in the mirror of Russian Dual Christian Naming (16th–17th Centuries) |
title_sort |
male vs female in the mirror of russian dual christian naming (16th–17th centuries) |
publisher |
Moscow State University of Education |
series |
Slovene |
issn |
2304-0785 2305-6754 |
publishDate |
2019-08-01 |
description |
The paper deals with the special features of Russian dual Christian naming—that is, the practice of giving a lay person an additional Christian name, other than his/her baptismal name. In the Middle Ages in Russia, a man could not under any circumstances get a female anthroponym as a second Christian name, and a woman, respectively, could not get a male anthroponym. In particular, no variations with respect to the calendar tradition, which transform male names into female names and vice versa, were allowed. This markedly contraposes the choice of the second Christian name for a lay woman to the choice of the monastic name for a nun. The work examines a number of incidents that would seem to violate this rigor of the gender distribution of anthroponyms, and discusses a number of related problems associated with the multiplicity of personal names in pre-Petrine Rus’.
DOI: 10.31168/2305-6754.2019.8.1.5 |
topic |
историческая ономастика средневековая русь многоименность месяцесловная традиция имянаречение в допетровской руси культ святых светская христианская двуименность личные небесные покровители |
url |
http://slovene.ru/ojs/index.php/slovene/article/view/444 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT annaflitvina malevsfemaleinthemirrorofrussiandualchristiannaming16th17thcenturies AT fjodorbuspenskij malevsfemaleinthemirrorofrussiandualchristiannaming16th17thcenturies |
_version_ |
1724376182970908672 |