Characteristics of scholars who review for predatory and legitimate journals: linkage study of Cabells Scholarly Analytics and Publons data
Objectives To describe and compare the characteristics of scholars who reviewed for predatory or legitimate journals in terms of their sociodemographic characteristics and reviewing and publishing behaviour.Design Linkage of random samples of predatory journals and legitimate journals of the Cabells...
Main Authors: | Matthias Egger, Anna Severin, Michaela Strinzel, Marc Domingo, Tiago Barros |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021-07-01
|
Series: | BMJ Open |
Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/7/e050270.full |
Similar Items
Similar Items
-
Cabells Scholarly Analytics
by: Lilian Hoffecker
Published: (2018-04-01) -
Cabell's Blacklist: A New Way to Tackle Predatory Journals
by: Soumitra Das, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01) -
Predatory Journals: A Threat to Scholarly Publishing
by: Jiban Shrestha, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01) -
“Predatory Journals” or “Predatory Scholars?” The Essential Role of the Peer Review Process
by: Francesco Chirico
Published: (2017-07-01) -
Predatory journals exploit structural weaknesses in scholarly publishing
by: Beall Jeffrey
Published: (2018-01-01)