Comparison of commercial ELISA assays for quantification of corticosterone in serum

Abstract Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits are widely used to quantify corticosterone levels for the assessment of stress in laboratory animals. The aim of this experiment was simply to evaluate if four different and widely used commercial ELISA assays would yield the same or similar va...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anne Marie Kinn Rød, Nina Harkestad, Finn Konow Jellestad, Robert Murison
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2017-07-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06006-4
id doaj-9658a880a9c34180bc49a93d6476ea0d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9658a880a9c34180bc49a93d6476ea0d2020-12-08T01:42:16ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222017-07-01711510.1038/s41598-017-06006-4Comparison of commercial ELISA assays for quantification of corticosterone in serumAnne Marie Kinn Rød0Nina Harkestad1Finn Konow Jellestad2Robert Murison3Department of Biological and Medical Psychology, University of BergenDepartment of Biological and Medical Psychology, University of BergenDepartment of Biological and Medical Psychology, University of BergenDepartment of Biological and Medical Psychology, University of BergenAbstract Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits are widely used to quantify corticosterone levels for the assessment of stress in laboratory animals. The aim of this experiment was simply to evaluate if four different and widely used commercial ELISA assays would yield the same or similar values of corticosterone in serum samples taken from laboratory rats after the mild stress of being held for sampling blood from the saphenous vein. Trunk blood was sampled from 32 male Wistar rats 30 minutes after this mild stress exposure and analysed with each of four commercial ELISA kits. Both the Arbor Assays and the DRG-4164 kits were significantly higher than the DRG-5186 and the Enzo kits. There were no significant differences between the DRG-5186 and Enzo kits. Overall the correlations between kits were high. In conclusion, the commercial ELISA kits tested in the present experiment yielded different values of total corticosterone in the same serum samples. The precision in determining true values of the corticosterone level is low for these commercial ELISA kits, although they may be used to determine relative differences within studies.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06006-4
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anne Marie Kinn Rød
Nina Harkestad
Finn Konow Jellestad
Robert Murison
spellingShingle Anne Marie Kinn Rød
Nina Harkestad
Finn Konow Jellestad
Robert Murison
Comparison of commercial ELISA assays for quantification of corticosterone in serum
Scientific Reports
author_facet Anne Marie Kinn Rød
Nina Harkestad
Finn Konow Jellestad
Robert Murison
author_sort Anne Marie Kinn Rød
title Comparison of commercial ELISA assays for quantification of corticosterone in serum
title_short Comparison of commercial ELISA assays for quantification of corticosterone in serum
title_full Comparison of commercial ELISA assays for quantification of corticosterone in serum
title_fullStr Comparison of commercial ELISA assays for quantification of corticosterone in serum
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of commercial ELISA assays for quantification of corticosterone in serum
title_sort comparison of commercial elisa assays for quantification of corticosterone in serum
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2017-07-01
description Abstract Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits are widely used to quantify corticosterone levels for the assessment of stress in laboratory animals. The aim of this experiment was simply to evaluate if four different and widely used commercial ELISA assays would yield the same or similar values of corticosterone in serum samples taken from laboratory rats after the mild stress of being held for sampling blood from the saphenous vein. Trunk blood was sampled from 32 male Wistar rats 30 minutes after this mild stress exposure and analysed with each of four commercial ELISA kits. Both the Arbor Assays and the DRG-4164 kits were significantly higher than the DRG-5186 and the Enzo kits. There were no significant differences between the DRG-5186 and Enzo kits. Overall the correlations between kits were high. In conclusion, the commercial ELISA kits tested in the present experiment yielded different values of total corticosterone in the same serum samples. The precision in determining true values of the corticosterone level is low for these commercial ELISA kits, although they may be used to determine relative differences within studies.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06006-4
work_keys_str_mv AT annemariekinnrød comparisonofcommercialelisaassaysforquantificationofcorticosteroneinserum
AT ninaharkestad comparisonofcommercialelisaassaysforquantificationofcorticosteroneinserum
AT finnkonowjellestad comparisonofcommercialelisaassaysforquantificationofcorticosteroneinserum
AT robertmurison comparisonofcommercialelisaassaysforquantificationofcorticosteroneinserum
_version_ 1724394569634676736