Defining “Social Sustainability”: Towards a Sustainable Solution to the Conceptual Confusion

The interest in "social sustainability" has recently increased in the field of urban development. We want societies, cities, and neighborhoods to be economically and environmentally sustainable, but we also want urban areas that are safe, diverse, walkable, and relaxing, just to mention a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karl de Fine Licht, Anna Folland
Format: Article
Language:Danish
Published: Norwegian University of Science and Technology Library 2019-11-01
Series:Etikk i Praksis: Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics
Online Access:https://www.ntnu.no/ojs/index.php/etikk_i_praksis/article/view/2913
id doaj-964ffee94fb74f36aa3cdb7dc6524933
record_format Article
spelling doaj-964ffee94fb74f36aa3cdb7dc65249332020-11-25T00:43:24ZdanNorwegian University of Science and Technology LibraryEtikk i Praksis: Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics1890-39911890-40092019-11-0113210.5324/eip.v13i2.2913Defining “Social Sustainability”: Towards a Sustainable Solution to the Conceptual ConfusionKarl de Fine Licht0Anna Folland1SP Sveriges Tekniska ForskningsinstitutSP Technical Research Institute of SwedenUppsala University The interest in "social sustainability" has recently increased in the field of urban development. We want societies, cities, and neighborhoods to be economically and environmentally sustainable, but we also want urban areas that are safe, diverse, walkable, and relaxing, just to mention a few examples. Strikingly, however, there is no consensus regarding what definition of "social sustainability" should be employed. Additionally, some people are skeptical about the prospect of finding a useful definition at all and claim it is impossible to satisfactorily define the concept for various reasons, such as its complexity. A potential first step towards navigating this conceptual maze is to provide desiderata for a definition of social sustainability. We defend a list of nine desiderata and thereby create a theoretical framework for analyzing and constructing a definition of "social sustainability". We also examine the skeptical arguments and find that it is premature to conclude that the goal of finding a useful definition is hopeless. With the criteria in place, the future debate can proceed by assessing definitions of "social sustainability" in a more structured and transparent manner. This activity is of upmost importance if we want to create just cities. Keywords: Social Sustainability, Definition, Purposes and Aims, Conditions of Adequacy https://www.ntnu.no/ojs/index.php/etikk_i_praksis/article/view/2913
collection DOAJ
language Danish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Karl de Fine Licht
Anna Folland
spellingShingle Karl de Fine Licht
Anna Folland
Defining “Social Sustainability”: Towards a Sustainable Solution to the Conceptual Confusion
Etikk i Praksis: Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics
author_facet Karl de Fine Licht
Anna Folland
author_sort Karl de Fine Licht
title Defining “Social Sustainability”: Towards a Sustainable Solution to the Conceptual Confusion
title_short Defining “Social Sustainability”: Towards a Sustainable Solution to the Conceptual Confusion
title_full Defining “Social Sustainability”: Towards a Sustainable Solution to the Conceptual Confusion
title_fullStr Defining “Social Sustainability”: Towards a Sustainable Solution to the Conceptual Confusion
title_full_unstemmed Defining “Social Sustainability”: Towards a Sustainable Solution to the Conceptual Confusion
title_sort defining “social sustainability”: towards a sustainable solution to the conceptual confusion
publisher Norwegian University of Science and Technology Library
series Etikk i Praksis: Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics
issn 1890-3991
1890-4009
publishDate 2019-11-01
description The interest in "social sustainability" has recently increased in the field of urban development. We want societies, cities, and neighborhoods to be economically and environmentally sustainable, but we also want urban areas that are safe, diverse, walkable, and relaxing, just to mention a few examples. Strikingly, however, there is no consensus regarding what definition of "social sustainability" should be employed. Additionally, some people are skeptical about the prospect of finding a useful definition at all and claim it is impossible to satisfactorily define the concept for various reasons, such as its complexity. A potential first step towards navigating this conceptual maze is to provide desiderata for a definition of social sustainability. We defend a list of nine desiderata and thereby create a theoretical framework for analyzing and constructing a definition of "social sustainability". We also examine the skeptical arguments and find that it is premature to conclude that the goal of finding a useful definition is hopeless. With the criteria in place, the future debate can proceed by assessing definitions of "social sustainability" in a more structured and transparent manner. This activity is of upmost importance if we want to create just cities. Keywords: Social Sustainability, Definition, Purposes and Aims, Conditions of Adequacy
url https://www.ntnu.no/ojs/index.php/etikk_i_praksis/article/view/2913
work_keys_str_mv AT karldefinelicht definingsocialsustainabilitytowardsasustainablesolutiontotheconceptualconfusion
AT annafolland definingsocialsustainabilitytowardsasustainablesolutiontotheconceptualconfusion
_version_ 1725278498921119744