Subsystem complexity and holography

Abstract As a probe of circuit complexity in holographic field theories, we study sub-system analogues based on the entanglement wedge of the bulk quantities appearing in the “complexity = volume” and “complexity = action” conjectures. We calculate these quantities for one exterior region of an eter...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cesar A. Agón, Matthew Headrick, Brian Swingle
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2019-02-01
Series:Journal of High Energy Physics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/JHEP02(2019)145
id doaj-964e83eea7f64c08b6e3aa5f3d9d32fb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-964e83eea7f64c08b6e3aa5f3d9d32fb2020-11-25T02:52:04ZengSpringerOpenJournal of High Energy Physics1029-84792019-02-012019215510.1007/JHEP02(2019)145Subsystem complexity and holographyCesar A. Agón0Matthew Headrick1Brian Swingle2C.N. Yang Institute for Theoretical Physics, State University of New YorkMartin Fisher School of Physics, Brandeis UniversityCondensed Matter Theory Center, Maryland Center for Fundamental Physics, Joint Center for Quantum Information and Computer Science, and Department of Physics, University of MarylandAbstract As a probe of circuit complexity in holographic field theories, we study sub-system analogues based on the entanglement wedge of the bulk quantities appearing in the “complexity = volume” and “complexity = action” conjectures. We calculate these quantities for one exterior region of an eternal static neutral or charged black hole in general dimensions, dual to a thermal state on one boundary with or without chemical potential respectively, as well as for a shock wave geometry. We then define several analogues of circuit complexity for mixed states, and use tensor networks to gain intuition about them. In the action approach, we find two possible cases depending on an ambiguity in the definition of the action associated with a counterterm. In one case, there is a promising qualitative match between the holographic action and what we call the purification complexity, the minimum number of gates required to prepare an arbitrary purification of the given mixed state. In the other case, the match is to what we call the basis complexity, the minimum number of gates required to prepare the given mixed state starting from a minimal complexity state with the same eigenvalue spectrum. One way to fix this ambiguity is to choose an action definition such that UV divergent part is positive, in which case the best match to the action result is the basis complexity. In contrast, the holographic volume does not appear to match any of our definitions of mixed-state complexity.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/JHEP02(2019)145AdS-CFT CorrespondenceBlack Holes
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cesar A. Agón
Matthew Headrick
Brian Swingle
spellingShingle Cesar A. Agón
Matthew Headrick
Brian Swingle
Subsystem complexity and holography
Journal of High Energy Physics
AdS-CFT Correspondence
Black Holes
author_facet Cesar A. Agón
Matthew Headrick
Brian Swingle
author_sort Cesar A. Agón
title Subsystem complexity and holography
title_short Subsystem complexity and holography
title_full Subsystem complexity and holography
title_fullStr Subsystem complexity and holography
title_full_unstemmed Subsystem complexity and holography
title_sort subsystem complexity and holography
publisher SpringerOpen
series Journal of High Energy Physics
issn 1029-8479
publishDate 2019-02-01
description Abstract As a probe of circuit complexity in holographic field theories, we study sub-system analogues based on the entanglement wedge of the bulk quantities appearing in the “complexity = volume” and “complexity = action” conjectures. We calculate these quantities for one exterior region of an eternal static neutral or charged black hole in general dimensions, dual to a thermal state on one boundary with or without chemical potential respectively, as well as for a shock wave geometry. We then define several analogues of circuit complexity for mixed states, and use tensor networks to gain intuition about them. In the action approach, we find two possible cases depending on an ambiguity in the definition of the action associated with a counterterm. In one case, there is a promising qualitative match between the holographic action and what we call the purification complexity, the minimum number of gates required to prepare an arbitrary purification of the given mixed state. In the other case, the match is to what we call the basis complexity, the minimum number of gates required to prepare the given mixed state starting from a minimal complexity state with the same eigenvalue spectrum. One way to fix this ambiguity is to choose an action definition such that UV divergent part is positive, in which case the best match to the action result is the basis complexity. In contrast, the holographic volume does not appear to match any of our definitions of mixed-state complexity.
topic AdS-CFT Correspondence
Black Holes
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/JHEP02(2019)145
work_keys_str_mv AT cesaraagon subsystemcomplexityandholography
AT matthewheadrick subsystemcomplexityandholography
AT brianswingle subsystemcomplexityandholography
_version_ 1724731589100830720