Mating system drives negative associations between morphological features in <it>Schistosomatidae</it>

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Sexual morphological features are known to be associated with the mating systems of several animal groups. However, it has been suggested that morphological features other than sexual characteristics could also be constrained by the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Beltran Sophie, Desdevises Yves, Portela Julien, Boissier Jérôme
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-08-01
Series:BMC Evolutionary Biology
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/10/245
id doaj-9640d697dd1c4b1f852a5f19d56f63ee
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9640d697dd1c4b1f852a5f19d56f63ee2021-09-02T16:23:01ZengBMCBMC Evolutionary Biology1471-21482010-08-0110124510.1186/1471-2148-10-245Mating system drives negative associations between morphological features in <it>Schistosomatidae</it>Beltran SophieDesdevises YvesPortela JulienBoissier Jérôme<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Sexual morphological features are known to be associated with the mating systems of several animal groups. However, it has been suggested that morphological features other than sexual characteristics could also be constrained by the mating system as a consequence of negative associations. <it>Schistosomatidae </it>are parasitic organisms that vary in mating system and can thus be used to explore links between the mating system and negative associations with morphological features.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>A comparative analysis of <it>Schistosomatidae </it>morphological features revealed an association between the mating system (monogamous <it>versus </it>polygynandrous) and morphological characteristics of reproduction, nutrition, and locomotion.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The mating system drives negative associations between somatic and sexual morphological features. In monogamous species, males display a lower investment in sexual tissues and a higher commitment of resources to tissues involved in female transport, protection, and feeding assistance. In contrast, males of polygynandrous species invest to a greater extent in sexual tissues at the cost of reduced commitment to female care.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/10/245
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Beltran Sophie
Desdevises Yves
Portela Julien
Boissier Jérôme
spellingShingle Beltran Sophie
Desdevises Yves
Portela Julien
Boissier Jérôme
Mating system drives negative associations between morphological features in <it>Schistosomatidae</it>
BMC Evolutionary Biology
author_facet Beltran Sophie
Desdevises Yves
Portela Julien
Boissier Jérôme
author_sort Beltran Sophie
title Mating system drives negative associations between morphological features in <it>Schistosomatidae</it>
title_short Mating system drives negative associations between morphological features in <it>Schistosomatidae</it>
title_full Mating system drives negative associations between morphological features in <it>Schistosomatidae</it>
title_fullStr Mating system drives negative associations between morphological features in <it>Schistosomatidae</it>
title_full_unstemmed Mating system drives negative associations between morphological features in <it>Schistosomatidae</it>
title_sort mating system drives negative associations between morphological features in <it>schistosomatidae</it>
publisher BMC
series BMC Evolutionary Biology
issn 1471-2148
publishDate 2010-08-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Sexual morphological features are known to be associated with the mating systems of several animal groups. However, it has been suggested that morphological features other than sexual characteristics could also be constrained by the mating system as a consequence of negative associations. <it>Schistosomatidae </it>are parasitic organisms that vary in mating system and can thus be used to explore links between the mating system and negative associations with morphological features.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>A comparative analysis of <it>Schistosomatidae </it>morphological features revealed an association between the mating system (monogamous <it>versus </it>polygynandrous) and morphological characteristics of reproduction, nutrition, and locomotion.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The mating system drives negative associations between somatic and sexual morphological features. In monogamous species, males display a lower investment in sexual tissues and a higher commitment of resources to tissues involved in female transport, protection, and feeding assistance. In contrast, males of polygynandrous species invest to a greater extent in sexual tissues at the cost of reduced commitment to female care.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/10/245
work_keys_str_mv AT beltransophie matingsystemdrivesnegativeassociationsbetweenmorphologicalfeaturesinitschistosomatidaeit
AT desdevisesyves matingsystemdrivesnegativeassociationsbetweenmorphologicalfeaturesinitschistosomatidaeit
AT portelajulien matingsystemdrivesnegativeassociationsbetweenmorphologicalfeaturesinitschistosomatidaeit
AT boissierjerome matingsystemdrivesnegativeassociationsbetweenmorphologicalfeaturesinitschistosomatidaeit
_version_ 1721172891724152832