Territorial Conflicts, Agency and the Strategic Appropriation of Interventions in Kenya’s Southern Drylands
A number of scholars have noted that interventions, such as development programmes and climate change adaptation projects, that simplify complex social realities and thus lose sight of the relational dynamics beyond the target or beneficiary group, risk contributing to conflict. This article examine...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2018-11-01
|
Series: | Sustainability |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/4156 |
id |
doaj-962dbe585bf84a0c90179f24d4d5d8c9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-962dbe585bf84a0c90179f24d4d5d8c92020-11-25T01:32:41ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502018-11-011011415610.3390/su10114156su10114156Territorial Conflicts, Agency and the Strategic Appropriation of Interventions in Kenya’s Southern DrylandsAngela Kronenburg García0Earth and Life Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, BelgiumA number of scholars have noted that interventions, such as development programmes and climate change adaptation projects, that simplify complex social realities and thus lose sight of the relational dynamics beyond the target or beneficiary group, risk contributing to conflict. This article examines how a series of interventions in a particular dryland area in southern Kenya became embroiled in a long-running territorial conflict between the Loita Maasai (the beneficiary community) and their neighbours, the non-beneficiary Purko Maasai. Based on ethnographic research and by taking a historical perspective, it shows how Loita Maasai leaders systematically appropriated these outside interventions, used and reworked them with the strategic aim of stopping land loss to ongoing Purko encroachment. The analysis reveals two ways in which Loita leaders realized this: (a) by using interventions to stake out spatial claims to land; and (b) by capitalizing on the tendency of interventions to simplify local contexts. This article contributes to the debate on the linkages between intervention and conflict by highlighting the agency of intervention beneficiaries and showing that, through their actions, interventions may unwittingly reproduce and even aggravate existing conflicts.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/4156territorial conflictinterventionsagencydrylandsLoita MaasaiKenyanatural resource conflict |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Angela Kronenburg García |
spellingShingle |
Angela Kronenburg García Territorial Conflicts, Agency and the Strategic Appropriation of Interventions in Kenya’s Southern Drylands Sustainability territorial conflict interventions agency drylands Loita Maasai Kenya natural resource conflict |
author_facet |
Angela Kronenburg García |
author_sort |
Angela Kronenburg García |
title |
Territorial Conflicts, Agency and the Strategic Appropriation of Interventions in Kenya’s Southern Drylands |
title_short |
Territorial Conflicts, Agency and the Strategic Appropriation of Interventions in Kenya’s Southern Drylands |
title_full |
Territorial Conflicts, Agency and the Strategic Appropriation of Interventions in Kenya’s Southern Drylands |
title_fullStr |
Territorial Conflicts, Agency and the Strategic Appropriation of Interventions in Kenya’s Southern Drylands |
title_full_unstemmed |
Territorial Conflicts, Agency and the Strategic Appropriation of Interventions in Kenya’s Southern Drylands |
title_sort |
territorial conflicts, agency and the strategic appropriation of interventions in kenya’s southern drylands |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sustainability |
issn |
2071-1050 |
publishDate |
2018-11-01 |
description |
A number of scholars have noted that interventions, such as development programmes and climate change adaptation projects, that simplify complex social realities and thus lose sight of the relational dynamics beyond the target or beneficiary group, risk contributing to conflict. This article examines how a series of interventions in a particular dryland area in southern Kenya became embroiled in a long-running territorial conflict between the Loita Maasai (the beneficiary community) and their neighbours, the non-beneficiary Purko Maasai. Based on ethnographic research and by taking a historical perspective, it shows how Loita Maasai leaders systematically appropriated these outside interventions, used and reworked them with the strategic aim of stopping land loss to ongoing Purko encroachment. The analysis reveals two ways in which Loita leaders realized this: (a) by using interventions to stake out spatial claims to land; and (b) by capitalizing on the tendency of interventions to simplify local contexts. This article contributes to the debate on the linkages between intervention and conflict by highlighting the agency of intervention beneficiaries and showing that, through their actions, interventions may unwittingly reproduce and even aggravate existing conflicts. |
topic |
territorial conflict interventions agency drylands Loita Maasai Kenya natural resource conflict |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/4156 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT angelakronenburggarcia territorialconflictsagencyandthestrategicappropriationofinterventionsinkenyassoutherndrylands |
_version_ |
1725080463497756672 |