Territorial Conflicts, Agency and the Strategic Appropriation of Interventions in Kenya’s Southern Drylands

A number of scholars have noted that interventions, such as development programmes and climate change adaptation projects, that simplify complex social realities and thus lose sight of the relational dynamics beyond the target or beneficiary group, risk contributing to conflict. This article examine...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Angela Kronenburg García
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-11-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/4156
id doaj-962dbe585bf84a0c90179f24d4d5d8c9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-962dbe585bf84a0c90179f24d4d5d8c92020-11-25T01:32:41ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502018-11-011011415610.3390/su10114156su10114156Territorial Conflicts, Agency and the Strategic Appropriation of Interventions in Kenya’s Southern DrylandsAngela Kronenburg García0Earth and Life Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, BelgiumA number of scholars have noted that interventions, such as development programmes and climate change adaptation projects, that simplify complex social realities and thus lose sight of the relational dynamics beyond the target or beneficiary group, risk contributing to conflict. This article examines how a series of interventions in a particular dryland area in southern Kenya became embroiled in a long-running territorial conflict between the Loita Maasai (the beneficiary community) and their neighbours, the non-beneficiary Purko Maasai. Based on ethnographic research and by taking a historical perspective, it shows how Loita Maasai leaders systematically appropriated these outside interventions, used and reworked them with the strategic aim of stopping land loss to ongoing Purko encroachment. The analysis reveals two ways in which Loita leaders realized this: (a) by using interventions to stake out spatial claims to land; and (b) by capitalizing on the tendency of interventions to simplify local contexts. This article contributes to the debate on the linkages between intervention and conflict by highlighting the agency of intervention beneficiaries and showing that, through their actions, interventions may unwittingly reproduce and even aggravate existing conflicts.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/4156territorial conflictinterventionsagencydrylandsLoita MaasaiKenyanatural resource conflict
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Angela Kronenburg García
spellingShingle Angela Kronenburg García
Territorial Conflicts, Agency and the Strategic Appropriation of Interventions in Kenya’s Southern Drylands
Sustainability
territorial conflict
interventions
agency
drylands
Loita Maasai
Kenya
natural resource conflict
author_facet Angela Kronenburg García
author_sort Angela Kronenburg García
title Territorial Conflicts, Agency and the Strategic Appropriation of Interventions in Kenya’s Southern Drylands
title_short Territorial Conflicts, Agency and the Strategic Appropriation of Interventions in Kenya’s Southern Drylands
title_full Territorial Conflicts, Agency and the Strategic Appropriation of Interventions in Kenya’s Southern Drylands
title_fullStr Territorial Conflicts, Agency and the Strategic Appropriation of Interventions in Kenya’s Southern Drylands
title_full_unstemmed Territorial Conflicts, Agency and the Strategic Appropriation of Interventions in Kenya’s Southern Drylands
title_sort territorial conflicts, agency and the strategic appropriation of interventions in kenya’s southern drylands
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2018-11-01
description A number of scholars have noted that interventions, such as development programmes and climate change adaptation projects, that simplify complex social realities and thus lose sight of the relational dynamics beyond the target or beneficiary group, risk contributing to conflict. This article examines how a series of interventions in a particular dryland area in southern Kenya became embroiled in a long-running territorial conflict between the Loita Maasai (the beneficiary community) and their neighbours, the non-beneficiary Purko Maasai. Based on ethnographic research and by taking a historical perspective, it shows how Loita Maasai leaders systematically appropriated these outside interventions, used and reworked them with the strategic aim of stopping land loss to ongoing Purko encroachment. The analysis reveals two ways in which Loita leaders realized this: (a) by using interventions to stake out spatial claims to land; and (b) by capitalizing on the tendency of interventions to simplify local contexts. This article contributes to the debate on the linkages between intervention and conflict by highlighting the agency of intervention beneficiaries and showing that, through their actions, interventions may unwittingly reproduce and even aggravate existing conflicts.
topic territorial conflict
interventions
agency
drylands
Loita Maasai
Kenya
natural resource conflict
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/4156
work_keys_str_mv AT angelakronenburggarcia territorialconflictsagencyandthestrategicappropriationofinterventionsinkenyassoutherndrylands
_version_ 1725080463497756672