Relational Communication Spaces: Infrastructures and Discursive Practices

Digital communication technologies, social web platforms, and mobile communication have fundamentally altered the way we communicate publicly. They have also changed our perception of space, thus making a re-calibration of a spatial perspective on public communication necessary. We argue that such a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexa Keinert, Volkan Sayman, Daniel Maier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2021-07-01
Series:Media and Communication
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3988
id doaj-96261b3e930e4f64884b65c24367ec53
record_format Article
spelling doaj-96261b3e930e4f64884b65c24367ec532021-07-23T10:23:06ZengCogitatioMedia and Communication2183-24392021-07-0193869610.17645/mac.v9i3.39882050Relational Communication Spaces: Infrastructures and Discursive PracticesAlexa Keinert0Volkan Sayman1Daniel Maier2Department of Political and Social Sciences, Freie Universität Berlin, GermanyInstitute of Sociology, Technical University of Berlin, GermanyGerman Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, GermanyDigital communication technologies, social web platforms, and mobile communication have fundamentally altered the way we communicate publicly. They have also changed our perception of space, thus making a re-calibration of a spatial perspective on public communication necessary. We argue that such a new perspective must consider the relational logic of public communication, which stands in stark contrast to the plain territorial notion of space common in communication research. Conceptualising the spatiality of public communication, we draw on Löw’s (2016) sociology of space. Her relational concept of space encourages us to pay more attention to (a) the infrastructural basis of communication, (b) the operations of synthesising the relational communication space through discursive practices, and (c) power relations that determine the accessibility of public communication. Thus, focusing on infrastructures and discursive practices means highlighting crucial socio-material preconditions of public communication and considering the effects of the power relations which are inherent in their spatialisation upon the inclusivity of public communication. This new approach serves a dual purpose: Firstly, it works as an analytical perspective to systematically account for the spatiality of public communication. Secondly, the differentiation between infrastructural spaces and spaces of discursive practices adds explanatory value to the perspective of relational communication spaces.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3988discursive practicesinclusioninfrastructuresmethodological nationalismnetworkspublic communicationsociology of spaceterritory
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alexa Keinert
Volkan Sayman
Daniel Maier
spellingShingle Alexa Keinert
Volkan Sayman
Daniel Maier
Relational Communication Spaces: Infrastructures and Discursive Practices
Media and Communication
discursive practices
inclusion
infrastructures
methodological nationalism
networks
public communication
sociology of space
territory
author_facet Alexa Keinert
Volkan Sayman
Daniel Maier
author_sort Alexa Keinert
title Relational Communication Spaces: Infrastructures and Discursive Practices
title_short Relational Communication Spaces: Infrastructures and Discursive Practices
title_full Relational Communication Spaces: Infrastructures and Discursive Practices
title_fullStr Relational Communication Spaces: Infrastructures and Discursive Practices
title_full_unstemmed Relational Communication Spaces: Infrastructures and Discursive Practices
title_sort relational communication spaces: infrastructures and discursive practices
publisher Cogitatio
series Media and Communication
issn 2183-2439
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Digital communication technologies, social web platforms, and mobile communication have fundamentally altered the way we communicate publicly. They have also changed our perception of space, thus making a re-calibration of a spatial perspective on public communication necessary. We argue that such a new perspective must consider the relational logic of public communication, which stands in stark contrast to the plain territorial notion of space common in communication research. Conceptualising the spatiality of public communication, we draw on Löw’s (2016) sociology of space. Her relational concept of space encourages us to pay more attention to (a) the infrastructural basis of communication, (b) the operations of synthesising the relational communication space through discursive practices, and (c) power relations that determine the accessibility of public communication. Thus, focusing on infrastructures and discursive practices means highlighting crucial socio-material preconditions of public communication and considering the effects of the power relations which are inherent in their spatialisation upon the inclusivity of public communication. This new approach serves a dual purpose: Firstly, it works as an analytical perspective to systematically account for the spatiality of public communication. Secondly, the differentiation between infrastructural spaces and spaces of discursive practices adds explanatory value to the perspective of relational communication spaces.
topic discursive practices
inclusion
infrastructures
methodological nationalism
networks
public communication
sociology of space
territory
url https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3988
work_keys_str_mv AT alexakeinert relationalcommunicationspacesinfrastructuresanddiscursivepractices
AT volkansayman relationalcommunicationspacesinfrastructuresanddiscursivepractices
AT danielmaier relationalcommunicationspacesinfrastructuresanddiscursivepractices
_version_ 1721290283516166144