A 2MW direct drive wind turbine; vector control and direct torque control techniques comparison

This paper presents a comparative study on the most popular control strategies used to control high power, Direct Drive Wind Turbines. The studied wind turbine is equipped with a supervision scheme in order to fulfil Grid connection requirements (GCR). For the generator-side converter, performances...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mehdi Allagui, Othman B.k. Hasnaoui, Jamel Belhadj
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Cape Town 2017-06-01
Series:Journal of Energy in Southern Africa
Online Access:https://journals.assaf.org.za/jesa/article/view/2679
id doaj-9616baf5186a4ade9445085e109d6b7a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9616baf5186a4ade9445085e109d6b7a2020-11-24T22:20:06ZengUniversity of Cape TownJournal of Energy in Southern Africa1021-447X2413-30512017-06-0125211712610.17159/2413-3051/2014/v25i2a26792679A 2MW direct drive wind turbine; vector control and direct torque control techniques comparisonMehdi Allagui0Othman B.k. HasnaouiJamel BelhadjUniversity of Cape TownThis paper presents a comparative study on the most popular control strategies used to control high power, Direct Drive Wind Turbines. The studied wind turbine is equipped with a supervision scheme in order to fulfil Grid connection requirements (GCR). For the generator-side converter, performances of the Field Oriented Control (FOC) and Direct Torque Control (DTC) are compared. Concerning the grid-side converter, Voltage Oriented Control (VOC) and Direct Power Control (DPC) are examined. The comparison is based on various criteria mainly, steady-state and transient performances. In addition, performances are evaluated in terms of low voltage ride through capabilities (LVRT), power limitation and reactive power control. It has been shown that best power quality features are given by vector control techniques. On the other hand, direct control offers the better dynamic response and power cross-coupling is substantially lower. Furthermore, during fault, the wind turbine does not trip for both techniques. However, vector control is better since it gives low power oscillationshttps://journals.assaf.org.za/jesa/article/view/2679
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mehdi Allagui
Othman B.k. Hasnaoui
Jamel Belhadj
spellingShingle Mehdi Allagui
Othman B.k. Hasnaoui
Jamel Belhadj
A 2MW direct drive wind turbine; vector control and direct torque control techniques comparison
Journal of Energy in Southern Africa
author_facet Mehdi Allagui
Othman B.k. Hasnaoui
Jamel Belhadj
author_sort Mehdi Allagui
title A 2MW direct drive wind turbine; vector control and direct torque control techniques comparison
title_short A 2MW direct drive wind turbine; vector control and direct torque control techniques comparison
title_full A 2MW direct drive wind turbine; vector control and direct torque control techniques comparison
title_fullStr A 2MW direct drive wind turbine; vector control and direct torque control techniques comparison
title_full_unstemmed A 2MW direct drive wind turbine; vector control and direct torque control techniques comparison
title_sort 2mw direct drive wind turbine; vector control and direct torque control techniques comparison
publisher University of Cape Town
series Journal of Energy in Southern Africa
issn 1021-447X
2413-3051
publishDate 2017-06-01
description This paper presents a comparative study on the most popular control strategies used to control high power, Direct Drive Wind Turbines. The studied wind turbine is equipped with a supervision scheme in order to fulfil Grid connection requirements (GCR). For the generator-side converter, performances of the Field Oriented Control (FOC) and Direct Torque Control (DTC) are compared. Concerning the grid-side converter, Voltage Oriented Control (VOC) and Direct Power Control (DPC) are examined. The comparison is based on various criteria mainly, steady-state and transient performances. In addition, performances are evaluated in terms of low voltage ride through capabilities (LVRT), power limitation and reactive power control. It has been shown that best power quality features are given by vector control techniques. On the other hand, direct control offers the better dynamic response and power cross-coupling is substantially lower. Furthermore, during fault, the wind turbine does not trip for both techniques. However, vector control is better since it gives low power oscillations
url https://journals.assaf.org.za/jesa/article/view/2679
work_keys_str_mv AT mehdiallagui a2mwdirectdrivewindturbinevectorcontrolanddirecttorquecontroltechniquescomparison
AT othmanbkhasnaoui a2mwdirectdrivewindturbinevectorcontrolanddirecttorquecontroltechniquescomparison
AT jamelbelhadj a2mwdirectdrivewindturbinevectorcontrolanddirecttorquecontroltechniquescomparison
AT mehdiallagui 2mwdirectdrivewindturbinevectorcontrolanddirecttorquecontroltechniquescomparison
AT othmanbkhasnaoui 2mwdirectdrivewindturbinevectorcontrolanddirecttorquecontroltechniquescomparison
AT jamelbelhadj 2mwdirectdrivewindturbinevectorcontrolanddirecttorquecontroltechniquescomparison
_version_ 1725776924908716032