A 2MW direct drive wind turbine; vector control and direct torque control techniques comparison
This paper presents a comparative study on the most popular control strategies used to control high power, Direct Drive Wind Turbines. The studied wind turbine is equipped with a supervision scheme in order to fulfil Grid connection requirements (GCR). For the generator-side converter, performances...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Cape Town
2017-06-01
|
Series: | Journal of Energy in Southern Africa |
Online Access: | https://journals.assaf.org.za/jesa/article/view/2679 |
id |
doaj-9616baf5186a4ade9445085e109d6b7a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9616baf5186a4ade9445085e109d6b7a2020-11-24T22:20:06ZengUniversity of Cape TownJournal of Energy in Southern Africa1021-447X2413-30512017-06-0125211712610.17159/2413-3051/2014/v25i2a26792679A 2MW direct drive wind turbine; vector control and direct torque control techniques comparisonMehdi Allagui0Othman B.k. HasnaouiJamel BelhadjUniversity of Cape TownThis paper presents a comparative study on the most popular control strategies used to control high power, Direct Drive Wind Turbines. The studied wind turbine is equipped with a supervision scheme in order to fulfil Grid connection requirements (GCR). For the generator-side converter, performances of the Field Oriented Control (FOC) and Direct Torque Control (DTC) are compared. Concerning the grid-side converter, Voltage Oriented Control (VOC) and Direct Power Control (DPC) are examined. The comparison is based on various criteria mainly, steady-state and transient performances. In addition, performances are evaluated in terms of low voltage ride through capabilities (LVRT), power limitation and reactive power control. It has been shown that best power quality features are given by vector control techniques. On the other hand, direct control offers the better dynamic response and power cross-coupling is substantially lower. Furthermore, during fault, the wind turbine does not trip for both techniques. However, vector control is better since it gives low power oscillationshttps://journals.assaf.org.za/jesa/article/view/2679 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mehdi Allagui Othman B.k. Hasnaoui Jamel Belhadj |
spellingShingle |
Mehdi Allagui Othman B.k. Hasnaoui Jamel Belhadj A 2MW direct drive wind turbine; vector control and direct torque control techniques comparison Journal of Energy in Southern Africa |
author_facet |
Mehdi Allagui Othman B.k. Hasnaoui Jamel Belhadj |
author_sort |
Mehdi Allagui |
title |
A 2MW direct drive wind turbine; vector control and direct torque control techniques comparison |
title_short |
A 2MW direct drive wind turbine; vector control and direct torque control techniques comparison |
title_full |
A 2MW direct drive wind turbine; vector control and direct torque control techniques comparison |
title_fullStr |
A 2MW direct drive wind turbine; vector control and direct torque control techniques comparison |
title_full_unstemmed |
A 2MW direct drive wind turbine; vector control and direct torque control techniques comparison |
title_sort |
2mw direct drive wind turbine; vector control and direct torque control techniques comparison |
publisher |
University of Cape Town |
series |
Journal of Energy in Southern Africa |
issn |
1021-447X 2413-3051 |
publishDate |
2017-06-01 |
description |
This paper presents a comparative study on the most popular control strategies used to control high power, Direct Drive Wind Turbines. The studied wind turbine is equipped with a supervision scheme in order to fulfil Grid connection requirements (GCR). For the generator-side converter, performances of the Field Oriented Control (FOC) and Direct Torque Control (DTC) are compared. Concerning the grid-side converter, Voltage Oriented Control (VOC) and Direct Power Control (DPC) are examined. The comparison is based on various criteria mainly, steady-state and transient performances. In addition, performances are evaluated in terms of low voltage ride through capabilities (LVRT), power limitation and reactive power control. It has been shown that best power quality features are given by vector control techniques. On the other hand, direct control offers the better dynamic response and power cross-coupling is substantially lower. Furthermore, during fault, the wind turbine does not trip for both techniques. However, vector control is better since it gives low power oscillations |
url |
https://journals.assaf.org.za/jesa/article/view/2679 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mehdiallagui a2mwdirectdrivewindturbinevectorcontrolanddirecttorquecontroltechniquescomparison AT othmanbkhasnaoui a2mwdirectdrivewindturbinevectorcontrolanddirecttorquecontroltechniquescomparison AT jamelbelhadj a2mwdirectdrivewindturbinevectorcontrolanddirecttorquecontroltechniquescomparison AT mehdiallagui 2mwdirectdrivewindturbinevectorcontrolanddirecttorquecontroltechniquescomparison AT othmanbkhasnaoui 2mwdirectdrivewindturbinevectorcontrolanddirecttorquecontroltechniquescomparison AT jamelbelhadj 2mwdirectdrivewindturbinevectorcontrolanddirecttorquecontroltechniquescomparison |
_version_ |
1725776924908716032 |