Perioperative cardiovascular evaluation: heads or tails?

When dealing with surgical patients, a perioperative evaluation is essential to anticipate complications and institute measures to reduce the risks. Several algorithms and exams have been used to identify postoperative cardiovascular events, which account for more than 50% of perioperative mortality...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gabriel A.L. Carmo, Daniela Calderaro, Pai C. Yu, Danielle M. Gualandro, André C. Marques, Cristina S. Bittar, Adriana F. Pastana, Bruno Caramelli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associação Médica Brasileira 2012-08-01
Series:Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302012000400025
id doaj-96083d78f78c4333956bb09c0397dd2e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-96083d78f78c4333956bb09c0397dd2e2020-11-25T00:20:38ZengAssociação Médica BrasileiraRevista da Associação Médica Brasileira0104-42301806-92822012-08-0158450551210.1590/S0104-42302012000400025Perioperative cardiovascular evaluation: heads or tails?Gabriel A.L. CarmoDaniela CalderaroPai C. YuDanielle M. GualandroAndré C. MarquesCristina S. BittarAdriana F. PastanaBruno CaramelliWhen dealing with surgical patients, a perioperative evaluation is essential to anticipate complications and institute measures to reduce the risks. Several algorithms and exams have been used to identify postoperative cardiovascular events, which account for more than 50% of perioperative mortality. However, they are far from ideal. Some of these algorithms and exams were proposed before important advances in cardiology, at a time when pharmacological risk reduction strategies for surgical patients were not available. New biomarkers and exams, such as C-reactive protein, brain natriuretic peptide, and multislice computed tomography have been used in cardiology and have provided important prognostic information. The ankle-brachial index is another significant marker of atherosclerosis. However, specific information regarding the perioperative context of all these methods is still needed. The objective of this article is to evaluate cardiovascular risk prediction models after noncardiac surgery.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302012000400025Perioperative caregeneral surgerybrain natriuretic peptidegeneral anesthesiacardiovascular riskankle-brachial index
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gabriel A.L. Carmo
Daniela Calderaro
Pai C. Yu
Danielle M. Gualandro
André C. Marques
Cristina S. Bittar
Adriana F. Pastana
Bruno Caramelli
spellingShingle Gabriel A.L. Carmo
Daniela Calderaro
Pai C. Yu
Danielle M. Gualandro
André C. Marques
Cristina S. Bittar
Adriana F. Pastana
Bruno Caramelli
Perioperative cardiovascular evaluation: heads or tails?
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
Perioperative care
general surgery
brain natriuretic peptide
general anesthesia
cardiovascular risk
ankle-brachial index
author_facet Gabriel A.L. Carmo
Daniela Calderaro
Pai C. Yu
Danielle M. Gualandro
André C. Marques
Cristina S. Bittar
Adriana F. Pastana
Bruno Caramelli
author_sort Gabriel A.L. Carmo
title Perioperative cardiovascular evaluation: heads or tails?
title_short Perioperative cardiovascular evaluation: heads or tails?
title_full Perioperative cardiovascular evaluation: heads or tails?
title_fullStr Perioperative cardiovascular evaluation: heads or tails?
title_full_unstemmed Perioperative cardiovascular evaluation: heads or tails?
title_sort perioperative cardiovascular evaluation: heads or tails?
publisher Associação Médica Brasileira
series Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
issn 0104-4230
1806-9282
publishDate 2012-08-01
description When dealing with surgical patients, a perioperative evaluation is essential to anticipate complications and institute measures to reduce the risks. Several algorithms and exams have been used to identify postoperative cardiovascular events, which account for more than 50% of perioperative mortality. However, they are far from ideal. Some of these algorithms and exams were proposed before important advances in cardiology, at a time when pharmacological risk reduction strategies for surgical patients were not available. New biomarkers and exams, such as C-reactive protein, brain natriuretic peptide, and multislice computed tomography have been used in cardiology and have provided important prognostic information. The ankle-brachial index is another significant marker of atherosclerosis. However, specific information regarding the perioperative context of all these methods is still needed. The objective of this article is to evaluate cardiovascular risk prediction models after noncardiac surgery.
topic Perioperative care
general surgery
brain natriuretic peptide
general anesthesia
cardiovascular risk
ankle-brachial index
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302012000400025
work_keys_str_mv AT gabrielalcarmo perioperativecardiovascularevaluationheadsortails
AT danielacalderaro perioperativecardiovascularevaluationheadsortails
AT paicyu perioperativecardiovascularevaluationheadsortails
AT daniellemgualandro perioperativecardiovascularevaluationheadsortails
AT andrecmarques perioperativecardiovascularevaluationheadsortails
AT cristinasbittar perioperativecardiovascularevaluationheadsortails
AT adrianafpastana perioperativecardiovascularevaluationheadsortails
AT brunocaramelli perioperativecardiovascularevaluationheadsortails
_version_ 1725366049166065664