Perioperative cardiovascular evaluation: heads or tails?
When dealing with surgical patients, a perioperative evaluation is essential to anticipate complications and institute measures to reduce the risks. Several algorithms and exams have been used to identify postoperative cardiovascular events, which account for more than 50% of perioperative mortality...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Associação Médica Brasileira
2012-08-01
|
Series: | Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302012000400025 |
id |
doaj-96083d78f78c4333956bb09c0397dd2e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-96083d78f78c4333956bb09c0397dd2e2020-11-25T00:20:38ZengAssociação Médica BrasileiraRevista da Associação Médica Brasileira0104-42301806-92822012-08-0158450551210.1590/S0104-42302012000400025Perioperative cardiovascular evaluation: heads or tails?Gabriel A.L. CarmoDaniela CalderaroPai C. YuDanielle M. GualandroAndré C. MarquesCristina S. BittarAdriana F. PastanaBruno CaramelliWhen dealing with surgical patients, a perioperative evaluation is essential to anticipate complications and institute measures to reduce the risks. Several algorithms and exams have been used to identify postoperative cardiovascular events, which account for more than 50% of perioperative mortality. However, they are far from ideal. Some of these algorithms and exams were proposed before important advances in cardiology, at a time when pharmacological risk reduction strategies for surgical patients were not available. New biomarkers and exams, such as C-reactive protein, brain natriuretic peptide, and multislice computed tomography have been used in cardiology and have provided important prognostic information. The ankle-brachial index is another significant marker of atherosclerosis. However, specific information regarding the perioperative context of all these methods is still needed. The objective of this article is to evaluate cardiovascular risk prediction models after noncardiac surgery.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302012000400025Perioperative caregeneral surgerybrain natriuretic peptidegeneral anesthesiacardiovascular riskankle-brachial index |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Gabriel A.L. Carmo Daniela Calderaro Pai C. Yu Danielle M. Gualandro André C. Marques Cristina S. Bittar Adriana F. Pastana Bruno Caramelli |
spellingShingle |
Gabriel A.L. Carmo Daniela Calderaro Pai C. Yu Danielle M. Gualandro André C. Marques Cristina S. Bittar Adriana F. Pastana Bruno Caramelli Perioperative cardiovascular evaluation: heads or tails? Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira Perioperative care general surgery brain natriuretic peptide general anesthesia cardiovascular risk ankle-brachial index |
author_facet |
Gabriel A.L. Carmo Daniela Calderaro Pai C. Yu Danielle M. Gualandro André C. Marques Cristina S. Bittar Adriana F. Pastana Bruno Caramelli |
author_sort |
Gabriel A.L. Carmo |
title |
Perioperative cardiovascular evaluation: heads or tails? |
title_short |
Perioperative cardiovascular evaluation: heads or tails? |
title_full |
Perioperative cardiovascular evaluation: heads or tails? |
title_fullStr |
Perioperative cardiovascular evaluation: heads or tails? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Perioperative cardiovascular evaluation: heads or tails? |
title_sort |
perioperative cardiovascular evaluation: heads or tails? |
publisher |
Associação Médica Brasileira |
series |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira |
issn |
0104-4230 1806-9282 |
publishDate |
2012-08-01 |
description |
When dealing with surgical patients, a perioperative evaluation is essential to anticipate complications and institute measures to reduce the risks. Several algorithms and exams have been used to identify postoperative cardiovascular events, which account for more than 50% of perioperative mortality. However, they are far from ideal. Some of these algorithms and exams were proposed before important advances in cardiology, at a time when pharmacological risk reduction strategies for surgical patients were not available. New biomarkers and exams, such as C-reactive protein, brain natriuretic peptide, and multislice computed tomography have been used in cardiology and have provided important prognostic information. The ankle-brachial index is another significant marker of atherosclerosis. However, specific information regarding the perioperative context of all these methods is still needed. The objective of this article is to evaluate cardiovascular risk prediction models after noncardiac surgery. |
topic |
Perioperative care general surgery brain natriuretic peptide general anesthesia cardiovascular risk ankle-brachial index |
url |
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302012000400025 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gabrielalcarmo perioperativecardiovascularevaluationheadsortails AT danielacalderaro perioperativecardiovascularevaluationheadsortails AT paicyu perioperativecardiovascularevaluationheadsortails AT daniellemgualandro perioperativecardiovascularevaluationheadsortails AT andrecmarques perioperativecardiovascularevaluationheadsortails AT cristinasbittar perioperativecardiovascularevaluationheadsortails AT adrianafpastana perioperativecardiovascularevaluationheadsortails AT brunocaramelli perioperativecardiovascularevaluationheadsortails |
_version_ |
1725366049166065664 |