Incorporating management history into forest growth modelling

Mechanistic modelling is an important tool for understanding the impacts of climate change and pollutants on forest growth. One of the common practical limitations of these models is a lack of specific information regarding management activities such as thinning or harvesting, which can have a very...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eastaugh CS, Hasenauer H
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Italian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology (SISEF) 2011-11-01
Series:iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://iforest.sisef.org/contents/?id=ifor0597-004
id doaj-960402b7110643c4be0b4813907f562a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-960402b7110643c4be0b4813907f562a2020-11-24T21:42:58ZengItalian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology (SISEF)iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry1971-74581971-74582011-11-014121221710.3832/ifor0597-004597Incorporating management history into forest growth modellingEastaugh CS0Hasenauer H1Institute of Silviculture, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna (Austria).Institute of Silviculture, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna (Austria).Mechanistic modelling is an important tool for understanding the impacts of climate change and pollutants on forest growth. One of the common practical limitations of these models is a lack of specific information regarding management activities such as thinning or harvesting, which can have a very strong influence on the accuracy of results. The use of inventory data for model parameterization and calibration is also problematic, as inventories are designed to have large volumes of data amalgamated to give accurate mean results across large areas. The precision of single point estimates is often quite low.This study uses BIOME-BGC to model forest growth on 1133 sites of the Austrian National Forest Inventory, and develops a method to estimate timber removal patterns prior to the commencement of record keeping on the sites. Recognizing the poor precision of individual point estimates in the data, we do not seek to precisely calibrate the model to the data on each point. Rather, we assume that the point-wise inventory estimates will be normally distributed around the true values. We then model each site assuming no management interventions, and compare this with inventory results. Plotting the “error” between model results and NFI data shows a strong right-skew, reflecting the modelled lack of timber removals. A Box-Cox transformation of the error plot, centred on zero, would represent an unbiased model estimate of the data, thus we can determine the historic timber removals as the difference between the original error curve and its Box-Cox transformation. Calibrating the model with this information allow us to represent forest volume with greater accuracy than would otherwise be possible.https://iforest.sisef.org/contents/?id=ifor0597-004BIOME-BGCInventoryUncertaintyThinningModel initialisation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eastaugh CS
Hasenauer H
spellingShingle Eastaugh CS
Hasenauer H
Incorporating management history into forest growth modelling
iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry
BIOME-BGC
Inventory
Uncertainty
Thinning
Model initialisation
author_facet Eastaugh CS
Hasenauer H
author_sort Eastaugh CS
title Incorporating management history into forest growth modelling
title_short Incorporating management history into forest growth modelling
title_full Incorporating management history into forest growth modelling
title_fullStr Incorporating management history into forest growth modelling
title_full_unstemmed Incorporating management history into forest growth modelling
title_sort incorporating management history into forest growth modelling
publisher Italian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology (SISEF)
series iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry
issn 1971-7458
1971-7458
publishDate 2011-11-01
description Mechanistic modelling is an important tool for understanding the impacts of climate change and pollutants on forest growth. One of the common practical limitations of these models is a lack of specific information regarding management activities such as thinning or harvesting, which can have a very strong influence on the accuracy of results. The use of inventory data for model parameterization and calibration is also problematic, as inventories are designed to have large volumes of data amalgamated to give accurate mean results across large areas. The precision of single point estimates is often quite low.This study uses BIOME-BGC to model forest growth on 1133 sites of the Austrian National Forest Inventory, and develops a method to estimate timber removal patterns prior to the commencement of record keeping on the sites. Recognizing the poor precision of individual point estimates in the data, we do not seek to precisely calibrate the model to the data on each point. Rather, we assume that the point-wise inventory estimates will be normally distributed around the true values. We then model each site assuming no management interventions, and compare this with inventory results. Plotting the “error” between model results and NFI data shows a strong right-skew, reflecting the modelled lack of timber removals. A Box-Cox transformation of the error plot, centred on zero, would represent an unbiased model estimate of the data, thus we can determine the historic timber removals as the difference between the original error curve and its Box-Cox transformation. Calibrating the model with this information allow us to represent forest volume with greater accuracy than would otherwise be possible.
topic BIOME-BGC
Inventory
Uncertainty
Thinning
Model initialisation
url https://iforest.sisef.org/contents/?id=ifor0597-004
work_keys_str_mv AT eastaughcs incorporatingmanagementhistoryintoforestgrowthmodelling
AT hasenauerh incorporatingmanagementhistoryintoforestgrowthmodelling
_version_ 1725916094051385344